Timeline across the tribulation
Hence how the appointment of the FDS over all his belongings is supposed to occur “during the great tribulation“ (= end of the wicked world), all other end-time-events - first the fall of religion babylon, secondly the coming of the lord, thirdly the judgment with the dying of the goats, fourthly at least the appointment of the slave over all belongings and fifthly in final step the armagedon after the rapture of some anointed would all happen also „during the tribulation", sayeth the watchtower 13 7 /15.
This statement tastes like sweet persuasivness, a logical and comprehensible unique schedule. What a sequence of events, also because it is so dramatic. Especially by positioning the coming/return of the Lord and the appointement as actual event into the timeline of "during the tribulation". Is such a schedule verifiable in the bible?
In the biblical order of writing given by the gospelwriter Matthew the appointment is mentioned only in the shape of a general advice not as event in the timeline.
Quite the contrary is the case in the bible account. It positions the coming of the Lord as the final event in the history „immediately after the tribulation". .....after the great tribulation. Already noted? Take your own bible and look up Matthew 24:29-31.
Mt 24,1-2 |
announcement of temple destruction |
Mt 24,3-14 |
beginning of the sorrows |
Mt 24,15-28 |
climax of the distress including v.21 „great tribulation“ |
Mt 24,29-31 |
of
the coming / return of the son of man |
Mt 24,32-42 |
parable of an alert host |
Mt 24,43-44 |
parable of the faithful and evil slave
|
Luke 12:35-48 parable about faithful slave
Luke 21,5-6 |
announcment of temple destruction |
Luke 21,7-19 |
beginning of the sorrows, wars, earthquakes |
Luke 21,20-24 |
judgment about Jerusalem |
Luke 21,25-26 |
signs at sun, moon, sea, earth and heaven |
Luke 21,27-28 |
coming of son of man |
Luke 21,29-36 |
warnings |