For a bible friendly archeologist like Dr Steve Collins and his team the city is the biblical SODOM. So for many evangelical christians like the Calvary church which is supporting such work the matter is solved. However there are problems.
You can listen to his arguments on Youtube: talk by Dr Collins: "As it was in the Days of Sodom and Gomorrah" or read his book.
In a paper "biblical problems in identifying Tall el Hamman as Sodom" are described in this paper by Mr Simon Turpin.
https://answersresearchjournal.org/identifying-tall-el-hammam-sodom/
So much is to study to the subject if the bible is untentable, Dr Collins is working his life for this.
If you find it further exciting what in Dr Collins eyes this discovery has to do with the Second Coming than such stuff is a must to watch.
In either case for JW there is no difference because the bible is anyway true they will find an argument.. Only in one point they have jumped around in interpretation wether the people of Sodom will be resurrected or not and wether it was back then a eternal judgment or not.
I dont know yet if the archeologists of the Nature article are elated to Dr Collins tesearch team.