@ Splash,
Excellent question! Perhaps there has been a mis-communication? I have been removed from the discussion by Recovery, so I will just watch from the side lines while the APOSTABUDDIES ASSEMBLE!!!!
Also, sorry i wrote " appoint " twice. Seriously, RECOVERY... we were taught that everything within the Congregation takes place under the direction of the Holy Spirit. YOU said that Holy Spirit doesn't prevent people from engaging in gross immorality". That is true, but you skirted the issue. The point is that if a person is a child molester or practicing serious sin in secret, WHY would the Holy Spirit move the Elder body to recommend them for appointment? After all every Elder will tell you that every decision they make has the backing of the Holy Spirit, don't believe me, just ask them. The next step as you know is for the C.O to approve it, then it goes to the Branch and is approved. FINALLY, the Elders meet with the Brother and ask 3 very specific questions which I assume you are ignorant of because they are in the Shepherd the Flock of God book, and you would not show disrespect for the channel of truth by reading a book that you are not qualified to read. Here is one of the questions:
Have you ever been involved at anytime in the past with child sexual molestation? Did God and Christ not know the answer to that question before they sent the Holy Spirit to confirm all those decisions? Surely the C.O, a man even more spiritual than the Elders must have had the Holy Spirit backing HIS decision? Then it slips past the Branch Office??!!!
So the Holy Spirit appointed all the child molester that have been or will soon be involved in legal cases involving the Society, because the Holy Spirit was backing every step of the process. This is totally different than scriptural examples of persons committing sins. Would God have chosen David to be King if David had serious secret sins? Of course not! Even Saul was a spiritual man when chosen, his sin came later. There are no scriptural examples of the Holy Spirit specifically choosing an individual for appointment who was covering over serious sin. A person can be chosen and THEN commit serious sin, but NEVER the other way around. Off topic, yes, but think about it. I mean reason on it. Everyone thinks, but not everyone reasons.