I used to be one and when I would approach someone that was an asshole it would only reinforce their "apostasy". However, being nice and classy ruins the presumptions and opens them up to investigation. Stay classy San Diego.
Posts by Emery
-
94Just Because Someone Is A JW "Apologist", It Doesn't Mean WE Have To Be Condescending & Nasty
by minimus ini know certain apologists might rub us the wrong way, but let's not treat them like their pieces of sh*t.. and i know certain posters might rub us the wrong way, but let's not be so quick to beat everybody down that's not of our same reasoning.. just saying..
-
-
-
54
When You Were Sitting During The Meetings What Were You Really Thinkng About?
by minimus ini used to listen to all the stupid comments and wonder if i could sneak out of there and scram!
even after i resigned as an elder, i went for a while and eventually began missing more and more meetings.
but while i was there, i'd listen to comments, chuckle to myself how dumb it all was and then go home with the knowledge that my days were numbered there..
-
-
Emery
On Sunday's I usually check out my Fantasy football stats on my phone every 15 mins (placing phone in lap behind bible). Start budgeting money in my head and then think about things I want/need to buy for the month.
-
529
Analysis of anti-607 BCE Rebuttals
by Ethos ini agreed yesterday to engage in the '607' topic.
i've read numerous threads and am well aware that this topic has been addressed and dissected quite thoroughly.
therefore, if you are uninterested in participating, that's fine.
-
-
Emery
Why can't JW apologist just read the books recommended and prepare a dissertation of it for all the apostates to read? Jeebuz Rice.
-
22
Most Damning Publication Not on CDROM
by turtleturtle inwhat is the most damning publication published by the wt that is not on the cdrom?.
.
-
-
Emery
Millions Now Living Will Never Die
-
42
Do JWs Still Feel The Need To Understand Their Teachings Or Have They Pretty Much Abandoned That Idea?
by minimus ini think most jws do not know how to explain their religious beliefs.
i don't think they could explain their views of 607 b.c.e.
, 1914, any prophetic bible books, the old vs. the new fds understanding, the blood fraction reasoning, etc.. do you think the average witness is able to explain from the bible why they believe things as they do?.
-
-
Emery
@james_woods, sorry let me clarify that, paradise earth for the great crowd, heaven for only the anointed.
-
42
Do JWs Still Feel The Need To Understand Their Teachings Or Have They Pretty Much Abandoned That Idea?
by minimus ini think most jws do not know how to explain their religious beliefs.
i don't think they could explain their views of 607 b.c.e.
, 1914, any prophetic bible books, the old vs. the new fds understanding, the blood fraction reasoning, etc.. do you think the average witness is able to explain from the bible why they believe things as they do?.
-
-
Emery
The only things JWs generally understand is; no war, no trinity, no blood, no heaven, no hell, Jehovah, armageddon, something about Jesus in heaven in 1914, and service.
That's pretty much it.
-
-
-
Emery
Also the Watchtower was publishing a spiritistic book during and after their 1919 appointment, "Angels and Women". Research it and have a great day!
-
73
A letter from a College Dropout
by Ethos indear harvard university,.
i have decided go leave this institution of education.
let me explain why.
-
-
Emery
Ethos, you presented so much fail the last couple of days that I just can't take you serious anymore.
-
37
Transfusion and Eating no difference?
by Marvin Shilmer intransfusion and eating no difference?.
today i added a new article to my blog addressing what watchtower says in public view about transfusion versus eating compared to what it admits in private about transfusion and eating.
its short and sweet, and of course documented.
-
-
Emery
@wha happened, thanks for that info!
-
37
Transfusion and Eating no difference?
by Marvin Shilmer intransfusion and eating no difference?.
today i added a new article to my blog addressing what watchtower says in public view about transfusion versus eating compared to what it admits in private about transfusion and eating.
its short and sweet, and of course documented.
-
-
Emery
Speaking of WT apologists... Greg Stafford was one of the biggest apologist for the WT, then this very subject alone turned him against the Society. His argument against the blood doctrine is one of the best ones i've read. Stafford documents through published medical research that the body does not eat or digest transfused blood but rather the body runs the blood almost indefinitely throughout the body acting as an organ. I would recommend you read some of his stuff Ethos. www.elihubooks.com