Hahaha, yeah I thought Ray Franz did an excellent job in ISOCF explaining all this. Their presumptuous arrogance is truly amazing. Here is what Franz had to say about it on pages 441-446.
Bending scripture to fit organizational history. The fallacy of provincialism is particularly evident in the organization's depicting itself as the central figure of various bible prophecies. They carefully develop certain features and incidents while ignoring others. Events of a comparatively trivial nature occurring in a certain time period of the past can be magnified to appear as of monumental significance, of world shaking importance. (Revelation and Daniel prophecies)
The application of bible prophecy to events that in many cases are essentially petty truly manifests a vivid imagination, but not discretion of faithful adherence to scripture. It is a clear example of the fallacy of "Provincialism." The later rejections of so many claimed fulfillments of prophecy demonstrates this to be so. In reality, what the WT does is make scriptures conform to certain features of the organization's history, as if that history was dominant and determinative over scripture.
Circular reasoning is also seen in that, in any discussion of qualifying for divine approval and assignment of authority the organization itself chooses the standards and conditions for passing the test, standards and conditions that are all adapted to fit precisely whatever it had been doing at the time that might be considered distinctive. The result of the "test" at the time of Christ's supposed invisible return is thus totally geared in their favor, so that they cannot fail to appear as victors.