Wouldn't it be illegal to buy a knockoff?
These guys are not 'knockoff' guys. It's the real $20k deal.
i just started to watch the february broadcast when i noticed a metallic rattle over the drone of sam's voice.
(does that man speak with a mouth full of chowin' tobacco or is he choking on the rubbish he reads off the autocue?).
yep it's his rolex.
Wouldn't it be illegal to buy a knockoff?
These guys are not 'knockoff' guys. It's the real $20k deal.
(from the source).
2015 january 13, boe.. .. re: technical preparations for the 20l5 visit of headquarters representatives.
.. click the link by the little blue arrow and nothing else.. .. https://www.sendspace.com/file/0g0mr0.
pop quiz on jw (current) teaching.
1. was jesus 2nd coming in 1914?.
2. is jesus 2nd (parousia) presence the same thing as his coming?.
i'm not on facebook, so i can't verify this;.
just heard from a trusted friend that a bethelite who had posted a copy of the happy @ bethel video online, has pleaded with everyone not to copy and repost it - because "their lives at bethel are at stake"!!!.
anyone heard of threats being made at hq?.
Halfway down this thread Dismissing servant posted the comment I think you're looking for.
It's supposedly by bethelite Josh Chang. Like you, I've not seen it on FB.
we are hearing reports of this promotion of the website by the jw and it seems to be a resource for them to dodge questions of their faith, when they don't have or want to give an answer to a question they direct the house holder to the organization/corporation's website to get the answer as if it really existed.there.. i think soon they are going to drop the door to door work all together as completely unprofitable, i mean their donation arrangement is a complete flop and has cost them i'm sure so they are in the process of shipping as many as they can into building up real estate for the corporation, because that is where the money is right now.. the whole jw.org is just a complete failure as a source of good information and only scare away people except the most vulnerable/gullible.. .
.
# 3 newbie post.
first of all, the newbies have set a record here!.
have you ever seen a 4pg post where 21 new members reply!
an incredible lecture that uses statistics to show that the world is much better than many people think.. the challenge of population explosion - has been solved.. the challenge of extreme poverty is within our grasp.. the challenge of climate change - well that's something we need to focus on,,,,,,,,, take an hour watch this, it dispels the doom and gloom preached by many.
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fack2knc08e.
That graphic should also include the phrase "Living standards increasing all over the world."
Edit: I see it mentions "quality of life".
OK, Move along, nothing to see here :-)
an incredible lecture that uses statistics to show that the world is much better than many people think.. the challenge of population explosion - has been solved.. the challenge of extreme poverty is within our grasp.. the challenge of climate change - well that's something we need to focus on,,,,,,,,, take an hour watch this, it dispels the doom and gloom preached by many.
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fack2knc08e.
well i'm sure we can come up with clever comments that make people feel uncomfortable by serving to decompartmentalize things that have been compartmentalized in the thinking of the average jw.
or comments that make the cognitive dissonance stand out plainly, these have to be said in innocent manner and with an apparent obliviousness to the contradiction.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/compartmentalization_%28psychology%29.
One comment was that the Bible in Judges 4:4 calls Deborah a judge and a prophetess, so she held a very important position...
The conductor then explained how Deborah was not actually a judge, and that suited me perfectly.
I wonder if any questioned his reasoning, having just been shown in the Bible that he was twisting things.
Oh well, we'll keep it up and see what happens.
today's wt study (nov 15, 2014 page 4, par 4.. the governing body in jerusalem sent the apostles peter and john to these samaritan converts, and they laid their hands on them, and they began to receive holy spirit.
(acts 8:5, 6, 14-17) .
there are multiple references to acts 15 whereby "the apostles and older men" were the governing body.. i have never noticed this applied to "the apostles" only in acts 8:14 before.. is this another new item to reinforce the concept of the governing body?.
We are taught that there was a 1st century GB, but they, although being anointed miracle workers personally chosen by Jesus, were not the F&DS.
Yes, they may have written most of the NT and were told to 'feed my little sheep', but they were NOT, I tell you, the F&DS who should feed the domestics.
The 8 men in NY alone are entitled to claim that title for themselves.