Captivating Terry, I was right there on the next table watching.
Don't feel bad, they were blasting Catholics.
It's their topic of conversation as they leave, and personal research later.
Posts by Splash
-
85"And what happened next was simply unbelievable!"
by Terry ini always sit in the same spot, just outside starbucks in a vestibule area with a table in the air-conditioned space.
i say "always," but not today.. somebody with two laptops and a table filled with business ledgers was in "my" favorite spot!.
so, i took a tiny wooden table inside the coffee shop on a long padded bench next to 3 other identical tables.. as the clickbait banner ads like to say: "and what happened next was simply unbelievable!".
-
-
-
53
What is their official explanation for not allowing beards?
by keyser soze ini ask because my gf, who knows all about my jw upbringing, convinced me to grow a goatee, just to see how it looks.
we both decided it looked good so i decided to keep it.
i tried to explain to her that as a jw, i wasn't allowed to grow one, but then drew a blank when she asked me why.
-
-
-
53
What is their official explanation for not allowing beards?
by keyser soze ini ask because my gf, who knows all about my jw upbringing, convinced me to grow a goatee, just to see how it looks.
we both decided it looked good so i decided to keep it.
i tried to explain to her that as a jw, i wasn't allowed to grow one, but then drew a blank when she asked me why.
-
-
Splash
A study made great progress.
Over a period of years he came to all the meetings, joined the TMS, wanted to go out on the ministry.Elders took him in the back room and said he had to lose the well groomed and dignified beard.
Study quit associating - never seen again. True story.
To the elders, enforcing an unwritten rule beyond their jurisdiction was more important than saving a soul.
BTW, how many 1,000's of hours does it take to bring in just one convert?
Link +7 / -0 -
53
What is their official explanation for not allowing beards?
by keyser soze ini ask because my gf, who knows all about my jw upbringing, convinced me to grow a goatee, just to see how it looks.
we both decided it looked good so i decided to keep it.
i tried to explain to her that as a jw, i wasn't allowed to grow one, but then drew a blank when she asked me why.
-
-
Splash
In the '70s there was a WT which mentioned beards in the same sentence as hippies.
In the 2010's there was a WT which correlated beards with pirates.
No-one wants to be a hippy pirate, so beards are banned.
Actually there has never been a letter, publication or rule to say you can't have a beard.
The nearest they come to formalising it is if you are a convention speaker then you can't have one.
Read the Theocratic School book and it just talks about being neat and clean.
Every ruling at a congregation level comes from an implied reading of disapproval from the WT's that I mentioned above.Link +5 / -0 -
42
Gross hypocrisy in September 15, 2015 Watchtower
by Island Man inask any jw the question "why do jehovah's witnesses impose their views on others?
we do not impose our views on anyone!".
do you impose your views on others?
-
-
-
77
GEOFFREY JACKSON TO APPEAR BEFORE ROYAL COMMISSION ON FRIDAY 14TH August!!!
by defender of truth inthe royal commissions public hearing into the jehovahs witnesses will recommence in sydney on friday 14 august 2015 at 11:00am.. it is anticipated that the hearing will hear from one witness, mr geoffrey jackson, a member of the governing body of jehovahs witnesses.. .
.
www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/media-centre/media-releases/2015-08/public-hearing-into-the-jehovah%e2%80%99s-witnesses-to-rec.
-
-
-
42
Gross hypocrisy in September 15, 2015 Watchtower
by Island Man inask any jw the question "why do jehovah's witnesses impose their views on others?
we do not impose our views on anyone!".
do you impose your views on others?
-
-
-
32
Branch Manual 2015
by Marvin Shilmer inapparently the backroom arguments have been heard and decided.
the royal commission finally uploaded a redacted version of the 2015 branch manual.
watchtower lawyers were looking to have as much redacted from this manual as possible.
-
-
Splash
P. 138 Submitting Articles [for the wt/Awake]
Do not submit material for publication that might cause difficulty for our brothers locally or elsewhere. Many things can be written that will not hurt our work and may even engender goodwill. The truth should be presented, of course, but in a tactful way.Link +2 / -0 -
32
Branch Manual 2015
by Marvin Shilmer inapparently the backroom arguments have been heard and decided.
the royal commission finally uploaded a redacted version of the 2015 branch manual.
watchtower lawyers were looking to have as much redacted from this manual as possible.
-
-
Splash
There's no doubt that the GB are firmly in charge.
Chapter 1, Page 5.
Point 3. "While the Governing Body delegates certain details or responsibilities to committees made up of its own members, to committees made up of other dedicated servants of God, or to instruments such as corporations and legal agencies, the Governing Body always takes the lead in promoting the smooth functioning of the organisation and the unity of all of Gods people".
Point 4. The Governing Body gives final approval for new publications as well as new audio and video programs.
Point 6. [...] The Governing Body has the prerogative to use its discretion and look into any matters it deems necessary to examine with regard to the Kingdom work.
EDIT to Add : ThomasCovenant spotted the same!!
Link +1 / -0 -
75
If you could ask Geoffrey Jackson one question that he had to answer what would it be?
by jwleaks inwhat question would you ask geoffrey jackson, as a member of the governing body of jehovah's witnesses, to answer?
.
jw leaks.
-
-
Splash
Please explain these two comments from the Guidelines for Branch Office Service Desks
18. Factors to consider: At times, the conduct of an individual may not be classified as child abuse from the perspective of the congregation, but from a legal standpoint he may be viewed as guilty of such.
19. ... if the one who views child pornography does not involve anyone else in his actions, this is not considered to be child abuse from a congregational standpoint.
Link +6 / -0
