SFPW - I will bet you any thing you like that you and I will both die in this system.
konceptual99
JoinedPosts by konceptual99
-
120
In general, the people on this forum have a poor outlook spiritually speaking.
by Stand for Pure Worship inso i waz reading the august 15 wt study article, elisha saw fiery chariots, do you?
and it made me think about this forum.
if you remember, syria was hunting god's prophet, elisha.
-
-
-
6
Best proof to give a JW that humans history is older than 6000 years?
by Mr Fool inlooking for proven evidences.
can it be proven that jerichos walls were built 8000bc?.
.
-
-
konceptual99
You could give them a time machine and go back 10000 years or so and they still would not beleive you.
-
6
Does this mess up the creation timeline?
by Dis-Member inwith man having been on earth only 6000 years and stuff?.
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/oct/15/wiltshire-dig-frogs-legs-eaten-british-before-french.
-
-
konceptual99
That will teach me to read two Guardian articles in one day.
Either way it has to be tripe. Us? Here? Consuming the same delicacies as the cheese eating surrender monkeys?
No chance.
-
6
Does this mess up the creation timeline?
by Dis-Member inwith man having been on earth only 6000 years and stuff?.
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/oct/15/wiltshire-dig-frogs-legs-eaten-british-before-french.
-
-
konceptual99
No. Becuase carbon dating is all bollocks don't you know, what with the pre-flood water canopy keeping all those C14 ratios completely different.
I know 'cos I read it in the WT.
-
6
Does this mess up the creation timeline?
by Dis-Member inwith man having been on earth only 6000 years and stuff?.
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/oct/15/wiltshire-dig-frogs-legs-eaten-british-before-french.
-
-
konceptual99
No. The WTS treats Homo Erectus as an ape and nothing to do with the ancestry of humankind.
[EDIT] - sorry wrong thread!
-
72
New Understanding of this Generation
by pronomono inanother tidbit of information about this generation from the 1/15/2014 study edition under "let your kingdom come - but when?".
they've changed it again.. this generation will not pass away14-16.
what is a third reason for believing that gods kingdom will come soon?.
-
-
konceptual99
@losingit - couldn't agree more. The whole concept is bollocks. All I was trying to point out is that this is not a change to their overlapping generations teaching. What it is is yet another damage limitation exercise because it is clear from day one that they did not want to give this impression but have failed to do so. This is despite several attempts through the publications and DA/CA keynote talks.
My guess is that they have had continual feedback to the branches that the R&F don't understand it and think that it means the big A could still be 100+ years away. This is them trying to put an end to this long term view and ensure everyone brings it back down to it being just a handful of years away max. JWTalk already has speculations on timeframes.
-
72
New Understanding of this Generation
by pronomono inanother tidbit of information about this generation from the 1/15/2014 study edition under "let your kingdom come - but when?".
they've changed it again.. this generation will not pass away14-16.
what is a third reason for believing that gods kingdom will come soon?.
-
-
konceptual99
This is not a new understanding. It is a really mad way of trying to get it over for once and for all that the current generation teaching does not leave the way open for another 100+ years of the last days.
They didn't make it clear when they brought it out first, they tried in a subsequent WT and they have tried numerous times via DA & CA talks.
What they are effectively saying is that all the original generation of 1914 are now dead and that there are those of the annointed whose lives overlapped and there are others who became annointed after the first lot died. These are not part of the overlapping generation.
-
21
Why do you still go to meetings?
by Aroq ini'm asking this because there are a few on this site who do not agree with the wt or gb, but yet still go to meetings.. .
why?.
-
-
konceptual99
Becuase I don't have billy big bollocks that are big enough to cope with the pain, hassle and almighty fallout there would be if I simply stopped, let alone if I actually was completely open about how I don't believe a word of it any more.
I am on a very slow, slow fade. So far so good.
-
43
The governing body are so scared... so very, very scared. (see video)
by apocalypse in.
.
http://e-watchman.com/home/2012/11/11/who-really-is-the-faithful-and-discreet-slave.html.
-
-
konceptual99
We've got orange table tennis bats for an emergency at Haysbridge.
-
42
Head coverings yet again in the latest KM
by life is to short inmy husband just gave me the latest km the novermber 2013 and it yet again has a question box on head coverings.. question box "should a female publisher wear a head covering if she is accompanied by a male pubisher at a doorstep bible study?".
it says "when a female publisher conducts a reagular, scheduled bible study and a male kingdom publisher is present, she should wear a head covering.
(1 cor 11: 3-10) the july 15 2002, issue of the watchtower page 27, explains: "this is a prearranged session of teaching where the one conducting the the study actually presides.
-
-
konceptual99
We love this idea.