Yo
>bloodguilt was upon both Saul and his household suggests that, although Saul probably took the lead in the murderous action, the “sons” of Saul may directly or indirectly have shared in it.
Note the words used above: suggests, probably, may. That is pretty weak. Compare that to the commentary below.
Pasted from
. http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/smcdownlds/2sam.html
For the sin of one man (Saul), God punished everyone with famine. To stop the famine, God required human sacrifices
David delivered two of Saul's sons and five of his grandsons (who were sons of David's ex-wife Michal) to the Gibeonites to be put to death. This was in spite of the promise he had made to Saul not to kill any of his offspring after his death:
1Sam:24:17: And he said to David, Thou art more righteous than I: for thou hast rewarded me good, whereas I have rewarded thee evil.
1Sam:24:20: And now, behold, I know well that thou shalt surely be king, and that the kingdom of Israel shall be established in thine hand.
1Sam:24:21: Swear now therefore unto me by the LORD, that thou wilt not cut off my seed after me, and that thou wilt not destroy my name out of my father's house.
1Sam:24:22: And David sware unto Saul. And Saul went home; but David and his men gat them up unto the hold.
SS