Is the unified theory so compelling that it brings about its own existence?” st:
"with the theory, of everything, that would be at the core of all natural laws, would have to come the power, energy the theatre to enact it.
In some form, the energy that was used to make the material universe must have carried instruction how ro shape it with it., or at least the limitation" Waton
The puzzling thing is, there is nothing necessary about the particular laws
which govern our world. It is theoretically possible for there to be other
universes which have different laws to our own. This leads to the theory that there may be some sort of meta laws which eternally produces universes each of which
have their own bylaws. Either that or some sort of selection occurred which
chose the specific laws governing our universe.
What you said reminded me of an article I read by Paul
Davis
'So is that
the end of the story? Can the multiverse provide a complete and closed account
of all physical existence? Not quite. The multiverse comes with a lot of
baggage, such as an overarching space and time to host all those bangs, a
universe-generating mechanism to trigger them, physical fields to populate the
universes with material stuff, and a selection of forces to make things happen.
Cosmologists embrace these features by envisaging sweeping
"meta-laws" that pervade the multiverse and spawn specific bylaws on
a universe-by-universe basis. The meta-laws themselves remain unexplained –
eternal, immutable transcendent entities that just happen to exist and must
simply be accepted as given. In that respect the meta-laws have a similar
status to an unexplained transcendent god.'
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2010/sep/04/stephen-hawking-big-bang-gap