No-blood policy.
Shunning policy.
Anti higher education stance.
Their "two-witness rule" applied to child abuse.
Not reporting child abuse.
Retraumatising victims of child abuse by subjecting them to interogation by men unqualified and untrained to deal with child abuse, let alone investigate and pass judgement.
Labelling any members who disagree with their teachings and policies as "mentally diseased appstates."
Labelling non-members who disagree with their teachings and policies as "opposers."
Teaching women should be "in subjection" to men.
Oh and they are judgemental, narissistic, close-minded pains in the arse.
What's not to hate?
I can address all of your talking points if you request it, but for the time being I’ll address just one.
“Not reporting child abuse.”
The fixation on Jehovah's Witnesses doesn't make any sense.
There’s no organization blamed for not getting the police involved with adherents that attend activities associated with an organization, unless a crime committed has something to do with the organization itself.
For example, if a crime is committed in a facility owned and operated by a profit or nonprofit organization, administrative officials responsible for maintaining a safe environment in this organization have a civic duty to report the matter to the local authorities.
Outside of this perimeter, reporting “crimes punishable by law” is a responsibility shouldered by each and every individual person.
Administrative officials in the Jehovah’s Witness religion do require that church elders comply with mandatory reporting laws.