gorby went to the kh for family reasons today.. and landed right away middle in a pseudo history watchtower article.
just that aspect of the jw belief he is so sensative about.. so 1918 and 1919 are changed with one mark of a pencil.
the argument of change was in the past the argument of the doctrine.
The past idea about the 1914-1919 events was a reassembled house of cards that supported all following predictions, 1975 and all. but particularly the latest GB = Faithful & Discreet Slave of 1919 cornerstone.
With the 1918 captivity and release from "Babylon tg" removed, that house of doctrinal cards is actually collapsing, and with it the legitimacy of the WT's claims.
Lot's hand is already for softer tissue. , he is already shunning his judged & condemned wife.
gorby went to the kh for family reasons today.. and landed right away middle in a pseudo history watchtower article.
just that aspect of the jw belief he is so sensative about.. so 1918 and 1919 are changed with one mark of a pencil.
the argument of change was in the past the argument of the doctrine.
99 years from now, there will be knee-slapping at the thought that only one overlap would be enough to get the anointed near to the end, which is the doctrine now.
and it is ... why do most at the hall prefer to sit at the back and leave front rows empty?.
That applies only to k/halls, not assemblies, conventions, where the rush to get front seats is one of the proofs that this can not possibly be the true [christian] religion.
At the kh, the perspective, overall vision is bad from the very front rows. you look bad snoozing too.
interesting story i have a friend who is df but his wife still faithfully goes to meetings.
there's a single brother in the cong that is always flirting with his wife.
well at a recent meeting my df friend decided to show up to check this brother out.
Not in every culture are ladies able or primed to give the proverbial kick to the groin to inappropriate advances (to a married woman) for example. Even the inherent friendliness warmth of the orientals can be seen as a mis-cue for love - starved males.
Wt with it's invasive rules, leaves no outlet for the hormones' action, which was good when population size mattered. So:
what should be the overseer's role in this, are the husbands, absent, disfellowshipped, old, --left to their own devices to head off amorous advances, attacks on their families ? overt or subtle?
gorby went to the kh for family reasons today.. and landed right away middle in a pseudo history watchtower article.
just that aspect of the jw belief he is so sensative about.. so 1918 and 1919 are changed with one mark of a pencil.
the argument of change was in the past the argument of the doctrine.
Their whole claim to authority is based on them being the appointed Faithful & Discreet Slave, existing only during the time of the end. They strip away all that really happened and reshape it to bolster that claim.
It is certainly not by the accomplishments of wt that such a claim could be made or maintained.
WT's claim was always to be right, everybody else wrong. Was that not the message in our time? so, they are laying a new, crack - repaired foundation, crack-pot nevertheless.
interesting story i have a friend who is df but his wife still faithfully goes to meetings.
there's a single brother in the cong that is always flirting with his wife.
well at a recent meeting my df friend decided to show up to check this brother out.
In the name of holy association, a sexually frustrated male will try to establish a relationship with isolated sisters. sharing lotion has the connotation of setting up house, sharing the close touch, while the hapless husband is out of bounds.
A married woman might forgive her husband a dalliance (HRC) but not a deep relationship, the kind the amorous "brother" is trying to develop. Men differ.
An interesting ploy of these eager adonises is to to get a place that gives them 2 hrs of unrestricted view of the sister of their choosing, , married or not, prompting the discerning family to make the needed moves during song / prayer.
interesting story i have a friend who is df but his wife still faithfully goes to meetings.
there's a single brother in the cong that is always flirting with his wife.
well at a recent meeting my df friend decided to show up to check this brother out.
just fine. let us assume it was not a disfellowshipped marriage mate, but an unbelieving husband, a non attender. who should look out for the sister then? or should anybody?
interesting story i have a friend who is df but his wife still faithfully goes to meetings.
there's a single brother in the cong that is always flirting with his wife.
well at a recent meeting my df friend decided to show up to check this brother out.
The question remains, -- should the overseers be held responsible for allowing recurring situations like this ?
gorby went to the kh for family reasons today.. and landed right away middle in a pseudo history watchtower article.
just that aspect of the jw belief he is so sensative about.. so 1918 and 1919 are changed with one mark of a pencil.
the argument of change was in the past the argument of the doctrine.
just enough to be noticeable for some of us. Because many JWs are busy trying to keep from falling asleep
Juan, that is why we are so inconvenient, so dangerous to the wt, because we can see every new light is another admission of wt failure.
