some say we will never get back to pre-pandemic days.
others say we should expect to live with masks and social distancing as the “new normal “.
still others are hopeful that we can live life realizing there might never be an end to covid or cancer or influenza but our lives must continue to go on.
It may be a few more months before all social restrictions are lifted but I cant wait unitl we can go back to eating at restaurants freely, going to stores without wearing a mask and not hearing about this dam virus on the news every night.
Oh yes when the borders reopen and we can travel aboard without restraints, but I doubt that's going to happen until early next year.
he’s really implementing the democrats agenda!
he’s wasting no time !.
That's true to certain extent Min but sometimes politicians try to resole problems on their on accord with a partial influence from their backing financial supporters.
I think the Canadian style of federal government is better that the US for there appears to be more open debate and criticism from various parties toward the polices that the in power government are making.
he’s really implementing the democrats agenda!
he’s wasting no time !.
Picking political sides and then holding up a wall or a theoretical gun in your hand at the ready, only leads to ineffective government where the ending result no one really wins
he’s really implementing the democrats agenda!
he’s wasting no time !.
What I'm saying is that the person at the top level of governments usually with a couple advisers makes or creates the policies.
These created polices dont have to have a D or R stamped on them as in the case of the US.
anyone following the derek chauvin trial?.
if you are actually following it, not just listening to the media, you will likely realize that there is a huge gap between what is going on in court and what is being reported in the media.. if the trial was fair, i think he should be acquitted.
there is plenty of reasonable doubt about the cause of death (his dealer doesn't want to testify because he could be guilty of 3rd degree murder for selling him a fatal amount of fentanyl) and even doubt over whether the officer even had his knee on the guys neck or did anything counter to what they were meant to do as per policy.. but is it fair?
Just a thought ..... does it make rational sense that person would intentionally murder someone when a group of people are all around watching, including other police officers ?
don't know how many of y'all still watch it.. this month's topic is "the king of the north" - cook goes into monotonous detail over the jw interpretation about rome, germany, ussr, russia, etc.. leaving aside for other commentators the emotionally manipulative videos of jws in russian holding cells, the tearjerker interviews, the god-awful stiffness of cook (i suspect he has never genuinely smiled, much less laughed, in his 60+ years), just thought i'd comment on one topic.. the centerpiece of the program is a "morning worship" monologue from splane.
let's again just leave to the side the dude's pomposity, smugness, and inflated sense of his own genius, and think about this part of his monologue.. he was tracing the history of the "king of the north" and talked about how "britain" (not england, not the united kingdom, not great britain, but "britain" - no idea why they have that fixation - anyway...) became the kotn in the 19th century.. paraphrasing his comments: "britain would not have become kotn if france had its way.
france was much wealthier and more powerful, but at the battle of waterloo, britain defeated france.
Talk about craziness at best.
Yup but craziness mixed with fear and ignorance keeps the sustainability of the organization which in reality sustains themselves.
$$$ if you catch my drift
As a result keep on propagating which works, fear and ignorance can go a long way toward controlling people.
he’s really implementing the democrats agenda!
he’s wasting no time !.
I believe politicians should be judged and evaluated by their actions and effective policies and how those established policies work to the betterment of the population that they are designed for.
political party name or identity is really irreverent
Some people attache themselves to parties and fight to protect the representative of that party tooth and nail by presenting misinformation and structured self serving biases, kind like religious devotion and uncompromising loyalty .
I can think of one religious organization where its member are very much like that .
hopefully i’m doing this right and it will display for you.
this is an interview with michael yeadon, former vice president and chief science officer of pfizer.
of course he has been attacked, slandered, shunned, ect, and this will never be allowed on social media, but he has taken the time to appear in an unpaid interview.
So this virus pandemic was planned by Bill Gates and promoted by him to control the world's population.
RM123 backs out the room quietly and doesn't make eye contact.
he’s really implementing the democrats agenda!
he’s wasting no time !.
Yes it has, JWD has gone totally right wing nutsso
he’s really implementing the democrats agenda!
he’s wasting no time !.
Why is it the democrat agenda and not his own ideological strategical policies ?
....and what specifically is the democrat agenda ?
