Aztec.
$401k !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What job pays that much money!
I think i'm in the wrong job.
Congrats!
Mark (who is extremely jealous)
i just got offered my dream job!
i made it through two successful interviews and today they called me and said i got the job!
i'll make about $10,000 a year more than i am now!
Aztec.
$401k !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What job pays that much money!
I think i'm in the wrong job.
Congrats!
Mark (who is extremely jealous)
now, the war is over, the weapons were not used and of course have not been found.. how threatening could they be if they did not even use them when being invaded by a massive force (of the countries they hate)?!
perhaps, as many suspect, they didn't use them because they didn't have them?.
now we're being told that we'll have to be patient and give them time to find them.
Again,
They have changed the evidence needed from actual weapons to evidence of 'programs'.
But, I still think that if they feel the only way out of the mess they have gotten themselves in is to un-cover actual weapons, then they will, by any means.
How large a cache of weapons will be needed to provide this much needed proof? Not much. Maybe a few rockets of VX gas would be enough, or maybe a couple of barrels of any banned chemical. It doesn't matter about the size of the haul, as long as some are found, and I really think they will find some soon. And yes I do think they are capable of planting it....they've shown a total disregard for the rules so far, what makes you think that they wouldn't?
now, the war is over, the weapons were not used and of course have not been found.. how threatening could they be if they did not even use them when being invaded by a massive force (of the countries they hate)?!
perhaps, as many suspect, they didn't use them because they didn't have them?.
now we're being told that we'll have to be patient and give them time to find them.
Dubla.
Just let me clarify a few points:
The evidence of WMD 'programs' could probably be found in every country of the world...that is not what we were told Saddam had. We were told he had the actual Weapons themselves.
Changing the language at this stage to say evidence of 'programs' is dis-honest at best. Rumsfeld has claimed that there was NO new evidence of WMD in Iraq before the war, just the perspective changed through the 'prism' of what happened on sept 11th...again totally changing what they said before the war, that there was a clear and present danger to the security of the US and Britain.
We were also told by Tony Blair in the commons that Saddam could launch an attack in just 45 minutes. That was a total and blatant LIE.
http://www.enigmas.org/aef/lib/archeo/askulls.shtml
Figure C2
now i know where i was going wrong with my exams!
3,000 indian law students .
riot over new ban on cheating.
Now I know where I was going wrong with my exams!
3,000 Indian Law Students
Riot Over New Ban On Cheating By Shaikh Azizur Rahman in Calcutta
7-10-3
|
now, the war is over, the weapons were not used and of course have not been found.. how threatening could they be if they did not even use them when being invaded by a massive force (of the countries they hate)?!
perhaps, as many suspect, they didn't use them because they didn't have them?.
now we're being told that we'll have to be patient and give them time to find them.
Dubla.
I was making to point that the evidence that is needed to 'prove' Blair/Bush right doesn't now have to be drums full of anthrax.
They have changed the wording to say WMD 'programs'. This evidence can now come in the form of computor disks, dossiers and interviews with scientists.
I was very surprised when No WMD were found. Not that I thought that there were any there, but I thought that they would have found them, no matter what.
It is not beyond them to plant evidence, they've done it before and they'll do it again.
Blair is coming under increasing pressure. He is even being shouted at in Parliament by the opposition leader for trying to tar him with the same brush. His face was a picture, totally bewildered that he was being called a lier in front of the whole parliament, and then the whole house cheering....poor Tony.
from another thread:where else does the media so vividly show females as equal .
when i read this, i had to wonder: is there something wrong with doing so?
portraying women as equals?
Women and men are too different to say that they are equal...
Women are much better than men at certain things and visa versa.
If we had specific things to judge it would be easier to say. In most areas of business women are as good as men, except Sales.
Don't know why...just my experience.
for 3 months now i've had a work related project to write and complete, its due in this coming monday, and still i haven't even started it, i just can't seem to get my ass in gear ever with this sort of thing .
occasionaly i've looked over it, thought about what i'm gonna write,.......... then just shoved it to the back of my mind for another week.
all the time i've been getting more stressed as the deadlines been approaching.
I'll answer you...tomorrow
now, the war is over, the weapons were not used and of course have not been found.. how threatening could they be if they did not even use them when being invaded by a massive force (of the countries they hate)?!
perhaps, as many suspect, they didn't use them because they didn't have them?.
now we're being told that we'll have to be patient and give them time to find them.
There is still time to plant evidence.
Blair's spokesman called yesterday for patience to allow the US/British to find evidence of weapons 'programs'. The newscaster gave him a hard time and brought up the point that the word 'programs' wasn't mentioned before the war.
If they're going to use weapons 'programs' as evidence then a few files and plans for WMD will be sufficient for them to say 'There you are...we found evidence of Saddams WMD programs...we were right all along.'
It's all so obvious.
http://www.enigmas.org/aef/lib/archeo/askulls.shtml
Mary.
Yes your right. Childrens heads were bound from birth, usually royal families, to create an elongated head.
But have a look at the pictures above. The eye sockets are very shallow and close together for a human skull.