More info on the Jesus Fraud.
| |||||||||||||||
" who controls the past, controls the future.
who controls the present, controls the past.".
george orwell, 1984.
More info on the Jesus Fraud.
| |||||||||||||||
since we haven't found wmd in iraq yet, a lot of the anti-war/anti-bush crowd is claiming that the bush administration lied about iraq's weapons of mass destruction.
the story being floated now is that saddam had no wmd (or almost none) and that the bush administration didn't tell the truth about the wmd threat.
well, if they're going to claim that the bush administration lied, then there sure are a lot of other people, including quite a few prominent democrats, who have told the same lies since the inspectors pulled out of iraq in 1998. here are just a few examples of what i'm talking about... .
Very good point, Rem
.
turn msnbc on now, if you can or go to their site.. skally
Do you mean Jesus Bush?
i think most people are unfamiliar with why certain people behave the way they do.
most people lable those who are quite different as the rest as nutty, strange, plain nuts.
(i'm guilty as the rest)
Sounds like me!
Just call me King Mark
since we haven't found wmd in iraq yet, a lot of the anti-war/anti-bush crowd is claiming that the bush administration lied about iraq's weapons of mass destruction.
the story being floated now is that saddam had no wmd (or almost none) and that the bush administration didn't tell the truth about the wmd threat.
well, if they're going to claim that the bush administration lied, then there sure are a lot of other people, including quite a few prominent democrats, who have told the same lies since the inspectors pulled out of iraq in 1998. here are just a few examples of what i'm talking about... .
The Insiders Are Coming Out By William Rivers Pitt
t r u t h o u t | Perspective
Tuesday 08 July 2003
For many, many months now, we have endured what is known in the common political lexicon as an 'Imperial Presidency.' The term denotes an administration that keeps its secrets, says nothing to the press worth reporting, lies with impunity beneath the veil of those secrets, and threatens retaliation against anyone who might stand in the way. When done properly, an Imperial Presidency becomes a powerful, unstoppable force. When an Imperial Presidency is guarded in Congress by political allies who hold the majority, it becomes almost completely unassailable.
Think about it. When was the last time we got a straight answer out of the Bush administration? When was the last time anyone with real power demanded answers from the folks in the White House? In the vacuum, we wind up getting answers like the one Don Rumsfeld delivered on February 12, 2002 when faced with pointed press questions about terrorism:
"As we know, there are known knowns. There are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns. That is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns, the ones we don't know we don't know."
These boys could give lessons to Orwell. Without anyone in Congress slinging subpoenas, and with a press cowed by the threat of removal from the White House beat, there is no way to take an Imperial Presidency to task for its actions when deliberate gibberish is the rule of the news day.
There is no way.unless the White House insiders come out and start talking. Suddenly, that is exactly what is happening.
On June 26, I conducted an interview with 27-year CIA veteran Ray McGovern. McGovern served every President from Kennedy to Bush Sr., and delivered a wide spectrum of insight and data regarding both the September 11 attack and the second Iraq war. One key question McGovern answered dealt with the rapidly expanding scandal surrounding Bush administration tampering with evidence of Iraqi weapons.
The story has been taking a slow boil for months now, ever since the end of the war. The justification for attacking Iraq, as presented by the administration, was that Saddam Hussein had thousands of tons of deadly weapons practically falling out of his ears. Day after day came the dire reports from Bush, from Cheney, from Rumsfeld, from Rice, from Powell before the UN, from dozens of hired administration guns who saturated the airwaves with stories of looming doom in the shadow of September 11.
The weapons never showed up. Stories began to swirl about Vice President Cheney taking unprecedented trips to CIA headquarters for the purpose of leaning on the intelligence analysts so he would get the damning Iraq weapons reports the administration needed to justify combat. Stories began to swirl about obviously forged evidence of an Iraqi nuclear program that was deliberately used by Bush to justify war, despite the fact that everyone in the White House knew the evidence had been crudely faked. To counteract these stories, the Imperial Presidency laid blame for all of this on the CIA.
When I questioned McGovern on the impact these developments were having on the American intelligence community, McGovern made a prescient prediction:
"To the degree that esprit de corps exists, and I know it does among the folks we talk to, there is great, great turmoil there. In the coming weeks, we're going to be seeing folks coming out and coming forth with what they know, and it is going to be very embarrassing for the Bush administration."
since we haven't found wmd in iraq yet, a lot of the anti-war/anti-bush crowd is claiming that the bush administration lied about iraq's weapons of mass destruction.
the story being floated now is that saddam had no wmd (or almost none) and that the bush administration didn't tell the truth about the wmd threat.
well, if they're going to claim that the bush administration lied, then there sure are a lot of other people, including quite a few prominent democrats, who have told the same lies since the inspectors pulled out of iraq in 1998. here are just a few examples of what i'm talking about... .
The conservative party in Britain, and especially their leader Ian Duncan-Smith, supported the Government in their action against Iraq, based on the 'evidence' that the Labour government presented to the house of commons.
But since this 'evidence' has been proved false Duncan-Smith has been highly critical of the governments 'evidence' and accused Tony Blair of lying.
The fact that Democrats and Conservatives supported the governments of their country in a time of war is not unusual, they surely weren't expecting the dossiers to be fabricated and were continuing the policy of supporting the government in times of war.
Yes many Democrats lied, but when you look at governments and opposition parties, they are all governed by the same agenda's and always say what they think will further their career in the long run.
Don't forget, also, anone who was critical of the Bush governments stance on Iraq was labelled Anti-American and a career oriented politician isn't going to ruin his/her career going against something publically when they know it's going to happen anyway.
What happened to the Senater who criticised the Bush administrations stance on Iraq before the war? He was killed in yet another un-explained plane crash...good career move.
was dr kelly - vince fostered?
this time all those conspiracy nuts started their swim from the other side of the pond.
we all know that the english are surely above intrigue and sinister deeds, just ask roberto calvi, you know "god's banker", as he hung from blackfriars bridge.
The Prime Minister, Alastair Campbell, BBC journalists and Dr David Kelly's widow -- all we now know will testify to Lord Hutton's inquiry -- which got underway today. Lord Hutton promises to hear evidence "as to how and why this came about" -- this being the apparent suicide, which still hasn't been officially confirmed by the police. Is this really the right way to be conducting this inquiry? You can read what Lord Hutton revealed today about the pathologist's report and Dr Kelly's letter to his line manager about Andrew Gilligan here: http://www.channel4.com/news/2003/08/week_1/01_hutton.html
iris recognition - a new game of eye spy to speed the passenger's journey .
government wants system in 10 british airports by next year .
owen bowcott.
Maxwell,
Do you mean like this: http://www.channel4.com/news/2003/07/week_4/28_chips.html
Chips with everything | ||
Technology | ||
Published: 27-Jul-2003 By: David Rowan | ||
Microchip trackers, no bigger than a grain of sand, are set to become the latest weapon in the battle of the high street. | ||
The so-called Smart Tags can be fitted into virtually everything we buy, and send out a radio signal picked up by internet-linked computers. |
washington (cnn) -- the department of homeland security is warning that islamic extremists might be plotting suicide airliner hijackings to be carried out before the end of the summer, with possible targets including sites in britain, italy, australia or the eastern united states.
"as of mid-june, islamic extremists may have been planning suicide hijackings to be executed by the end of summer 2003," according to the document obtained tuesday by cnn.
"the plan may involve the use of five-man teams, each of which would attempt to seize control of a commercial aircraft either shortly after takeoff or shortly before landing at a chosen airport.
You've hit the nail on the head, Hamas.
ok... i have to admit that i have been obsessing over the movies the matrix... especially after the second one where some odd things happened.
agent smith was replicating in the matrix, neo was "feeling" and stopping the sentinels in the real world, agent smith copied himself into a human in zion.. now i normally don't obsess over movies... i usually just watch them once and then move on... no big deal.
but this time i have been trying to figure out all of the odd things about the matrix.. i wanted to throw my theories out for everyone to examine and see what you all think.... here goes... remember in the first movie when neo went to see the oracle?
I also too think that the 'real world' in the film is also a matrix. Yet another controlling mechanism for the ones who don't take to the normal programming of the Matrix....
we'll soon find out...