How does one pronounce that?
"It might be a soft J. I'm not sure. But, basically you just run. For like, an extended period of time."
jwerk /dʒəːk/ noun .
1. a member of the governing body of jehovah's witnesses.
2. informal - a religious fool who is neither inspired, nor infallible, but can err in doctrinal matters or in organization direction.
How does one pronounce that?
"It might be a soft J. I'm not sure. But, basically you just run. For like, an extended period of time."
imagine the scene, a comfortable conference room in brooklyn hq, with a round table with a handful of current gb members on one side.
a lone chair opposite is for the prospective new gb members to sit and be questioned as to their fitness.
lett asks, "have maintenance fitted your room with new light bulbs?".
I hear Geoffrey Jackson likes to jwerk it on the dance floor.
i voted today in nyc.
a well organized process.
very busy and most of the people voting were african american.
If I didn't have a job with random testing, I'd be making use of my state's cannabis laws right about now.
i voted today in nyc.
a well organized process.
very busy and most of the people voting were african american.
Never mind. Canada will probably build a wall before we do.
i voted today in nyc.
a well organized process.
very busy and most of the people voting were african american.
there is not much to be analyzed.
in a cult enviromment the leader will always look up for himself.
he would never hesitate to break every rule to save his own skin.
And hey, it's not like we can all lie in a statement to the court, right?
there is not much to be analyzed.
in a cult enviromment the leader will always look up for himself.
he would never hesitate to break every rule to save his own skin.
Just like warning labels, I like to think that every rule change has a story behind it.
the reason i ask this is because we heard reports that greenlees was kicked out of bethel because he was one and then we heard reports that another one, jaracz i believe was one all though it sounds kind of iffy to me.. 2 out of i don't how many total gb seems kind of high so i'm thinking that perhaps the percentage is quite higher as this would explain to a degree why the gb have written in clauses to keep the organization from reporting them to authorities.. it is true that part of the reason they remain silent to authorities is because of the reproach it brings to their precious corporation but i think that is only a small part of the reason and perhaps there might be a bigger reason maybe quite a few have been over powered by their darker side and have engaged in this behavior but because of denial and delusion they will not confess and willingly encourage cover ups.. just speculation i know but i'm starting to think that there is a very dark side to all of these guys hidden by their persona(jungian) that is making them stoop so low as to implement these very bad policies..
Aaaaand I learned something new again. Pat Garza's allegation against Ted Jaracz.
Jaracz infuriates me. I remember an issue came up between me and my parents when I was graduating high school, and my mom called Bethel and put me on the phone with Jaracz. I actually spoke to Jaracz on the phone years ago.
Now, it was funny then because I wanted to attend a program through school called the Presidential Classroom, and Jaracz actually joked a little with me about the president (George W. Bush).
Seeing his reaction in Panorama, his lack of compassion for victims, and his ridiculous stance that "we don't go beyond the things that are written", I cannot respect him.
. . . And JWs go beyond the things written all the freaking time.
november broadcast is up:.
https://www.jw.org/download/?fileformat=mp4&output=html&pub=jwb&issue=201611.
we learn interesting things.
starting this week the midweek has visual aids throughout the meeting such as sing along lyrics that scroll smoothly, images from the publications being used and the year text displayed in between.
does anybody have the files that were used or have they been leaked?.
I am not coming back to the meeting to do that.