I'm having fun with this quantitative analysis.Eden... even if it should be qualitative!
and I think Jeffro has a playgrounf crush on me. (giggling)
(1john2:22,23)who is the liar if it is not the one that denies that jesus is the christ?
this is the antichrist, the one that denies the father and the son.
23 everyone that denies the son does not have the father either.
I'm having fun with this quantitative analysis.Eden... even if it should be qualitative!
and I think Jeffro has a playgrounf crush on me. (giggling)
(1john2:22,23)who is the liar if it is not the one that denies that jesus is the christ?
this is the antichrist, the one that denies the father and the son.
23 everyone that denies the son does not have the father either.
I gave my statistical opinion on an assertion JW Gonebad was making about the Yearbook publication and what his data reflected.
I do know that a more appropriate statistical representation of his data would be a comparison of the ratio of references to Jesus to references to Jehovah and that using HIS data, the statistical representation of HIS data supports his claim.
The rest of each of your assertions could only serve as additional information for me.
(1john2:22,23)who is the liar if it is not the one that denies that jesus is the christ?
this is the antichrist, the one that denies the father and the son.
23 everyone that denies the son does not have the father either.
My post was with respect to JW Gonebad's claim...
Reference to our Lord Jesus Christ in WT literature has been on the wane for a really long time. The Yearbook of Jehovah’s Witnesses, as an example, which is printed annually to report on the ‘Christian’ ministry of the JW’s worldwide reflects a gigantic deficit on the emphasis placed on Jesus as opposed to Jehovah :
On the wane?... well, yeah... looking at the ensuing years from the 70's the ratio has been on the decline... we need 8 more years of data to support another drop.
Gigantic deficit?... well, 50% from the earliest recorded decade is statistically significant.
Now, you are absolutely correct that the data may be in error... but now that I think about it, it's PROPORTIONATELY erroneous.
If JW Gonebad wants to, s/he can rerun the numbers to improve his/her quantitative analysis by removing "Jehovah's Witnesses" (and any other parallel references like "Jehovah's Christian Congregation? ... not sure) from the criteria.
Thanks for the correction!
(1john2:22,23)who is the liar if it is not the one that denies that jesus is the christ?
this is the antichrist, the one that denies the father and the son.
23 everyone that denies the son does not have the father either.
You obviously don't know me.
Yeah... unfortunately that's kinda how this site works. LOL
Still luv ya!
(1john2:22,23)who is the liar if it is not the one that denies that jesus is the christ?
this is the antichrist, the one that denies the father and the son.
23 everyone that denies the son does not have the father either.
AH! Good point!
SO, perhaps we need to modify EdenOne's calculation slightly by reducing the number of honorable mentions of "Jehovah" by the combo "Jehovah's Witnesses".
Great catch! :)
Edit: And we don't need to know how often Jesus *should* be mentioned. The poster's concerns were related to a reduction in mentions so therefore the WTS can be used as a barometer against itself.
when we got to paragraphs 10,11 with the reference to the box at the top of the page - is your teaching up-to-date?
the conductor asked for an explanation of what the current 'bible truth' was.
for the first one, 'this generation (matt 24:34) absolutely nobody raised their hand!
they have moved about eight mentions of Jesus' presence (Matt 24 and 25) from having occurred in 1914 to the future.
Wait... so they're saying Jesus isn't here yet? How the heck am I going to require an answer for 1914 if the whole year disappears?
Bet he was quite mortified when another elder, in his comment, confessed that he had mistakenly been teaching people wrong about the sheep and goats one until very recently.
What was he teaching that was wrong and what is he now teaching?
(1john2:22,23)who is the liar if it is not the one that denies that jesus is the christ?
this is the antichrist, the one that denies the father and the son.
23 everyone that denies the son does not have the father either.
Dearest Jeffro,
Nerve hit? By a uni-platformist? Absolutely not! :)
Love,
NeverKnew
ADCMS,
Ten years? I didn't know that. Good to know.... Is it the same info as on the CD for that time period? It'd be nice to not have to bother you guys for CD info.
(1john2:22,23)who is the liar if it is not the one that denies that jesus is the christ?
this is the antichrist, the one that denies the father and the son.
23 everyone that denies the son does not have the father either.
Welllllllllll....
Given your benchmarks, and IF this data could be used as as a qualitative barameter and not the quantitative one that it is, it would be more appropriate to compare the ratio of Jesus/Jehovah. As long as you were consistent from year to year in your search criteria, one would derive the following:
2010-12 | 6.08% | ||
2000s | 5.21% | ||
1990s | 6.41% | ||
1980s | 8.30% | ||
1970s | 11.26% |
So, while there HAS been a decline in the ratio of references of Jesus to Jehovah in the annual yearbooks and his honorable mentions represent a 50% reduction of what it had been in the 70's, the trend for this decade is showing a slight improvement (or WTS error - not sure).
Once this thread's analysis has been completed, I'm sure the Yearbook Committee will make the appropriate "adjustments."
did you get baptized without being dedicated?.
why did you allow men to come between you and jehovah?.
why were you serving jehovah at all?
william's story .
my mother received a knock at the door when i was 4 years old, that knock would alter the course of my entire life.
it was then, she received what she and millions of others call 'the truth.
marked.
Thanks, Lois. :)