Posts by Quetzal

75

Meet George Floyd

by cofty in

his murder was a crime and justice must be done, but it's sobering to learn more about the man who is being lionised by millions.

thanks as always to the courageous candace owens.. ....

Quetzal

@simon

The reality is that the majority of people want tougher policing rather than lax policing or the "no policing" which is now being discussed as though it's remotely realistic.

More people want efficient policing and not necessarily tougher policing. You can not deal with every major societal problem through policing. Law makers can do a lot to ease some of these problems. If you criminalize a lot of things in society, you will also need to be able to enforce those.

During the Corvid19 lockdown in the UK, lawmakers made a mess and when the police tried to enforce, they were met a lot of backlash from the population. The lawmakers were at fault for making a law that wasn't clear and difficult to enforce and without adequate resources.

Gay sex used to be illegal and policing it must have been a nightmare. Since the 20th century, criminal laws against adultery have become controversial, with most Western countries decriminalising adultery. What about marijuana? What about women being topless?

You have a systemic problem that tougher policing will not solve.

246

Black Lives Matter—Do You Agree With Their Philosophy?

by minimus in

jw
friends

i agree with people who say all lives matter.

i think blm is a racist group.

if white people pushed an agenda saying white lives matter, some people would have a conniption..

Quetzal

@Anony Mous

So yes, institutional racism existed until the late 60s and as a result, welfare policies were designed with a racist background. However the welfare never went away, the Dems simply rebranded them as 'good' and 'helping' and a generation of black people forgot the reason they were designed the way they are and is now wholly dependent on it. Breaking a dependence on free stuff is hard, even though FDR explicitly said that his policies were not intended to last, we have them, almost a hundred years later, in their original form and any politician that says he wants to get rid of Social Security and Welfare is committing political suicide.

In your statement you said until the 60s and you continued by saying that the "the Dems simply rebranded them as 'good' and 'helping' and a generation of black people"

You just simply confirmed that "Institutional racism" still exist and it is perpetuated by the Dems.

What a lot of people seem to overlook when talking about welfare in America is that removing it will not only impact the black community, but also white people. Apparently there are more white people on Food stamps in America.

246

Black Lives Matter—Do You Agree With Their Philosophy?

by minimus in

jw
friends

i agree with people who say all lives matter.

i think blm is a racist group.

if white people pushed an agenda saying white lives matter, some people would have a conniption..

Quetzal

@anony mous

That doesn't mean everyone who votes Republican will suddenly have their kids become rich, but it's statistically a better chance that within 1 or 2 generations you are lifted out of poverty.

Good point. That is also why claiming that voting for the Dems is doing a disservices to minority communities doesn't hold true. My take on the left vs right issue is this. They are 2 different faces of the same coin. Politicians are there to help themselves first and maybe the people after.

This has nothing to do with your race by the way, sure, any minority group will have it more difficult because they are a minority group and thus need to do more to conform, but likewise, minority groups that are lawful (eg. immigrants and racial groups alike) will almost certainly have their kids do better vs minority groups that are illegally residing here and kids with parents that are criminals.

Well, you can tell the above to the Jews during the Nazi Germany occupation. Being a minority and the difficulties associated with that is more complex than just being "minority groups that are lawful " . You can also go and tell that to the Native Americans and here is something about being "minority groups that are lawful"

From 1778 to 1871, the United States government entered into more than 500 treaties with the Native American tribes; all of these treaties have since been violated in some way or outright broken by the US government, while at least one treaty was violated or broken by Native American tribes.

246

Black Lives Matter—Do You Agree With Their Philosophy?

by minimus in

jw
friends

i agree with people who say all lives matter.

i think blm is a racist group.

if white people pushed an agenda saying white lives matter, some people would have a conniption..

Quetzal

@simon

I mean, how unbelievably fucking stupid beyond belief do people have to be to vote for the party behind the KKK for the past 50 years thinking it's going to make their life better even though it never does?

The same reason poor white people keep voting for anyone who tells them what they want to hear and every time they keep getting f**ked over. They hear what they want to hear and they still remain poor. It's not that difficult to understand. You also make it sound as if the black community will be better off under Republican party. Go tell that to all the poor white people who have voted Republican and are still poor.

"Having aligned themselves with the Republican Party since the days of Abraham Lincoln, what made African Americans switch to the Democrats during the Depression Era?

246

Black Lives Matter—Do You Agree With Their Philosophy?

by minimus in

jw
friends

i agree with people who say all lives matter.

i think blm is a racist group.

if white people pushed an agenda saying white lives matter, some people would have a conniption..

Quetzal

@simon

That is not what those figures say and it's not what I said. If 13% of the population commit over 50% of a crime, it means they are severely over-represented and something is seriously wrong. It means there is a higher probability that a member of that population is likely someone who may commit that crime

This is a valid point you made above. However, why didn't you acknowledge some of the statistics from @

Hisclarkness as valid. You dismissed everything he posted. Were all the stats BS?

64

Would You Like To See Your Police Departments “Defunded”?

by minimus in

jw
friends

do you think it’s a good idea?.

Quetzal

@phoenixrisingo

Diversity is not something that is good. It does not make a country stronger. In fact its the opposite. Look at Japan, China Russia and Poland. They work hard to keep their country homogenized. And its working for them.

You obviously do not understand the subject matter. Most European countries as we know them today are formed by multiple tribes coming together( war and carnage). Scots, Welsh, English, Cornish,etc The same goes for France and Germany.

You mentioned Japan, China and Russia and Poland.

Do you know why there is a China town in most major western cities? If their system was that great, why didn't everyone stay in China? A lot of wealthy Chinese are investing their money in the US and Canada, why?

Poland, do you know how many polish people work in France, UK and they Netherlands? If Poland was that wonderful, they should all have stayed home.

Japan : Japanese Brazilians are the largest ethnic Japanese community outside Japan (numbering about 1.5 million, compared to about 1.2 million in the United States). They should all have stayed in Japan if the country is that great.

Russia : You know that there are over 40 ethnic groups in Russia and the largest are the Russians. That is why there are always conflicts with other ethnic groups like the Chechens. Homogenized and it's working for them?

if you actually believe that "Diversity is not something that is good" then, all White People should leave America and go back to where ever their ancestors came from. You will only have Native Americans and Mexicans left.

Diversity has its issues but looking at the situation from a narrow point of view doesn't help your narrative.

246

Black Lives Matter—Do You Agree With Their Philosophy?

by minimus in

jw
friends

i agree with people who say all lives matter.

i think blm is a racist group.

if white people pushed an agenda saying white lives matter, some people would have a conniption..

Quetzal

@simon

Let me try and make it simpler for you to grasp. If the UK government announced "free whiskey for all" it could notionally adversely affect the Scottish more than other nationalities, but there would be nothing "systemically racist" about the policy.

Very good point. Not unless the intention of the UK government was to adversely affect the Scotts, then, that will be a different conversation

Not really. The welfare state isn't "institutionally racist" per se, as it (AFAIK) doesn't have any racial component. But it seems to have had a severe negative effect on the black community more so than others. I am sure the recipients of the benefits don't see them as racist and would see it as racist to remove them. But neither would be true.

Very true. It is also true that you are likely to vote for who ever is giving your free $$$. It appears to affect the black community more probably because they are more vocal about it and it makes for good television. I believe it should have the same effects on other communities if the following numbers are correct

White people without a college degree ages 18 to 64 are the largest class of adults lifted out of poverty by such programs, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. The think tank's 2017 report stated that 6.2 million working-age whites were lifted above the poverty line in 2014 compared to 2.8 million blacks and 2.4 million Hispanics.

The above implies that a lot more communities will be negatively impacted by the welfare state and maybe the black community is the only one that gets the most coverage.

There are racist laws, but they are sold as being advantagious to blacks. Again, they are from the left so the effect is often the exact opposite of what they claim was the intent.

If you claim there are racist laws, does that imply "systemic racism"

32

Witnessing Work to Stop?

by Sea Breeze in

my 87 year old dad called me for the first time in 16 years the other day .... just to chat.

i was floored to say the least since he didn't even bother to call me when my mom died several years ago.

he called again today to inquire how i felt about jehovah's witnesses.

Quetzal

The preach work is only having a hiatus. It will come back but likely not as we know it

13

Tips for Traversing Tumultuous Times (MicroAgressions)

by JW_Researcher in

jw
friends

many of us are confused so this hand-dandy chart may assist.. .

Quetzal

@Under the Radar

You are likely looking at this from a narrow angle of

Being on welfare should not be a lifestyle choice one can make simply because one does not want to work

If you want to eliminate the welfare state and make people earn what they have.

You will need to remove

no food stamps,
no money for those who lost their jobs due to lock down Corvid19.
no money for big companies during the Corvid19
no legal loophole for big companies that avoid paying taxes
no more bailout money for Banks. Only survival of the fittest.
no more charitable organizations(oxfam, Red Cross, etc) that do not pay taxes
all disabled adults and children will have to be helped by family or they are on their own.
If you are injured during War or in some type of accident and you can no longer work, you are F**ked
all religion must pay taxes no more "free ride"
no more charitable deduction for taxes purposes.

You already know that welfare state was in response to a major financial crisis

The United States was the only industrialized country that went into the Great Depression of the 1930s with no social insurance policies in place. In 1935 Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal instituted significant social insurance policies. In 1938 Congress passed the Fair Labor Standards Act, limiting the work week to 40 hours and banning child labor for children under 16, over stiff congressional opposition from the low-wage South

The fact that the welfare state is being abused doesn't actually mean that it is inherently bad.

Western society has become one big kindergarten where everybody whines at the slightest offense, wants to sue if someone calls them a name, and thinks the world owes them a living.

Why do you want to go back to an age when you are freely able to "calls them a name"?

246

Black Lives Matter—Do You Agree With Their Philosophy?

by minimus in

jw
friends

i agree with people who say all lives matter.

i think blm is a racist group.

if white people pushed an agenda saying white lives matter, some people would have a conniption..

Quetzal

@simon interesting video

Here is a quote from the video at minute 2:07

The simple truth about "institutionalized racism" is that it does not exist, not anymore

At least he admitted that once open a time there was something called "institutionalized racism". So it is not all some made up fantasy.

@3:00 minutes

In areas where whites commits a lot of crime, polices shootings of whites are higher and in In areas where blacks commits a lot of crime, polices shootings of blacks are higher.

Good point and that makes sense.

@4:15

The reason that a higher percent of black men are killed by the police is because black men kill the most people.

not enough context was provide but still an interesting statement

@5:18

The welfare state is destroying the black family and creating a lot of fatherless boys and these things that the democrats are doing through policies are causing a lot of poor black men to turn to violence and drugs and that is why black men disproportionately find themselves in altercation with the police.

This is where he lost his mind and lost the argument he was trying to make when debunking the idea of . "institutionalized racism" or "systemic racism".

By citing the welfare state, he just validated the idea of a "systemic"/"institutionalized" problem that tries to disenfranchise the black community. His whole argument that the state is not out to get the black community just fell apart. It doesn't matter if this is initiated by the Dems or the Republican.

He came across as someone who understand the issue at hand but towards the end of his video he lost his way. Just for your information there is a reason why there is a welfare state

The United States was the only industrialized country that went into the Great Depression of the 1930s with no social insurance policies in place. In 1935 Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal instituted significant social insurance policies. In 1938 Congress passed the Fair Labor Standards Act, limiting the work week to 40 hours and banning child labor for children under 16, over stiff congressional opposition from the low-wage South

Something else the video missed is that the welfare state benefits a lot of people and not just blacks alone. Remember when the banks caused an economic crash "sub-prime" circa 2008/2009 and the Dems gave welfare money to help the rich people who broke the economy. They call that welfare check, "bail out" .

A lot of people also got welfare cash during the Corvid.

This is a good analysis of the situation and why "institutionalized racism" or "systemic racism" is such baloney,

Unfortunately the video just proved the contrary