Path, you err in your assessment of the article. The official WT policy that was recently stated is a person would not have sanction in their choice to go to the authorities. That is where it ends. The individual who wrote the letter stated,
Jehovah's Witnesses hide the molestation of their youths by threatening the victims with expulsion if they try to warn and protect other members or even to report the perpetrators to police.
The first part of the sentence remmains as a part of wt policy, if you warn others in the congregation about a molester who denies the charge and you do not have two eye witnesses then you could be disfellowshipped for slander. In addition, the Society has never stated the policy regarding authorities in writing till the latest letter to BOE. I have talked to many victims who were threatened with df if they brought reproach on Jehovah's organization by going to the police. If those elders had of called the Society they would have been informed not to take action, yet some never called and some were actually df for calling the police. Sadly the Society never saw fit to recind their DF. What was the basis for df? Loose conduct-a disregard for theocratic order, in other words if you do not do as we say we df you.
I do agree with you in the sense now that this has become a stated part of wt policy it is doubtful anyone who is a jw will be threatened with df in the event they wish to report a molester to the police. Do you think if the silentlambs had never spoken that this letter would have ever been written? I condsider it a small victory they were forced to make this policy clear in writing. Do you think wt will send me a thank-you card?
For others, shallow loyality is ignored as always.