I have read the comment made by truthseeker and it compels me to make a few remarks.
1. If you are really wanting to seek the direction of the organzation then why are you frequenting these forums?? It would appear you have another agenda.
2. I find your description of the senario a bit uncommon. Your wife leaves you and all that results is a visit by two in law's who arrive alone? This matter would immediately have attention from the elder body and they show up in two's.
3. If you want to be JW that is a choice, you are welcome to it as well as those who may make other choices. Make your choice and stick with it. Airing all on this forum seems a bit suspect at best.
4. Finally you wrote,
"When I mentioned the child abuse stuff, he pulled out a letter written from the society explaining the procedure Elders are supposed to take when a child molester is found out in the Cong. It said that if a servent, his position is removed. Civil authorties ARE notified. Even if one person comes forward, this happens. When someone who has molested people in the past comes into the cong. they are told that their history is known and they are not to be seen interacting with children, not even hugging or letting them sit on their lap."
I have a problem with the way this letter is presented and how misinformation is being given on this topic. First the letter you are referring to is the March 1997 BOE letter. You can read it on the silentlambs website under "WT letters." The first comment you made was, "When I mentioned the child abuse stuff, he pulled out a letter written from the society explaining the procedure Elders are supposed to take when a child molester is found out in the Cong."
This letter was far more than a procedure letter. It was a direct contradiction of the 1-1-97 wt article that lead everyone to believe child molesters would never a positions of responsibility in the congregation. The BOE letter made clear provision for them to again be used subject to WT aproval. Did you miss the comment "individual are not to be quiried?" That comment alone allowed child molesters to not be questioned regarding their past.
You said,
"It said that if a servent, his position is removed."
DUH! I think it would be reasonable to state that any person would lose privileges if they confessed to child molestation. What if he does not confess? What if it has been a long period of time since he molested? Can he then requalify? This letter made provision for that to happen.
You said,
"Civil authorties ARE notified. Even if one person comes forward, this happens."
FOUL!!! Not so and in this comment you are revealed. At no place is this statement made in ANY BOE letter. This is a pure lie and purposely stated to misdirect those who read it. I encourage any who question the validity of this statement to read all the WT letters on this topic and try and find one shread of evidence to validate this statement. As Farkel mentioned authorities will be contacted only after consulting with Wt legal and ONLY if it is a required reporting state. There are 16 at this time that are reporting states. If you claim you read this statement then you have a conterfeit BOE letter. It was never written by WT. IF you did not then why are you making false statements about the child abuse issue??
you wrote,
"When someone who has molested people in the past comes into the cong. they are told that their history is known and they are not to be seen interacting with children, not even hugging or letting them sit on their lap."
Again this is a complete misstatement. Only a person who has confessed or been convicted at the mouth of two credible eye witnesses will have a letter written regarding their past. If they lie or do not have the two credible eye witnesses then they are free to move where ever they wish and remain anonymous. For the confessed child molester the above statement applies in the context of the elders watching them only. The congregation is not informed at any time of the presence of a confessed child molester who may move in. We now know we have 23,720 confired JW molesters who are having letters written when they move, how many do you think there are that fall in to the latter catagory?
For a person who appears to place so much emphasis on finding and keeping the "truth" why do you spend so much time with lies and misinformation? You appear to be something you are not.