does criticism or opposition to the israeli government's zionist agenda legitimately constitute someone being branded as an anti-semite?.
is it this definition which is actually being targetted at certain members of the labour party?
.
l have just had another look at this and it appears that for 10 years Corbin had a close association with a group called Deir Yassin which is a group of prominent Holocaust deniers . The article says that it is not suggesting that Corbin has actually denied the Holocaust but questions his judgement in having ties with this organisation .
Do we know if Corbin has actually denied the Holocaust ?
Jan
does criticism or opposition to the israeli government's zionist agenda legitimately constitute someone being branded as an anti-semite?.
is it this definition which is actually being targetted at certain members of the labour party?
.
Good points LUHE .
Jan
does criticism or opposition to the israeli government's zionist agenda legitimately constitute someone being branded as an anti-semite?.
is it this definition which is actually being targetted at certain members of the labour party?
.
l am not a Labour supporter but in the interest of fairness l have wondered about that . Things look pretty bad when senior Jewish Labour members resign citing anti-Semitism as the reason . Would they , for love of their party , not acknowledge the difference ?
lt appears that there have been accusations of anti-Semitic tweets from Labour MPs and Ministers . Were these just condemnations of the Zionist agenda , does anyone know ?
Jan
Earnest , of course it changes the meaning which is why the WT does it , to fit in with their assertion that the Pre Jesus person was Michael - a created being .
As far as l know the WT is the only organisation to insert those words into the passage . The word "other "is not in the Greek and as far as l know ( though l will be corrected if wrong ) there is no grammatical reason to include it there .
The WT HAS to do this otherwise the verses read " For in him ALL things were created ....... ALL things have been created through him and for him " So Jesus was not part of created things .
This ties in with John 1 : 3 " Through him ALL things were made ; without him NOTHING was made that has been made . Again Jesus is not a member of things created .
To say that this has to be done to make sense of the passage only make sense to the WT and their theology .
Now l realise that most people on here couldn't give a flying fig about this but any JWs on here with doubts about the WT should take note .
Jan
Scholar , any thoughts ?
Jan
so after the unqualified success of my last review ( green book ) l thought that l would try again .
l went to see ford versus ferrari / le mans 66 according to where you live .
now l am no petrol head and talk of motor racing usually makes my eyes glaze over but this film is about much more than laps on a circuit .
Nice one 2+2=5 .
I had gotten that far Stan ! However l do suspect that your claim that Sutton was named after you just MAY be a bit fanciful
l use the phrase " all around the Wrekin " . l have been in Tamworth for 40+ years but l guess that you can't take the Brummie out of the girl .
Jan
so after the unqualified success of my last review ( green book ) l thought that l would try again .
l went to see ford versus ferrari / le mans 66 according to where you live .
now l am no petrol head and talk of motor racing usually makes my eyes glaze over but this film is about much more than laps on a circuit .
l suspect that Stan was joking , perhaps you can elaborate Stan .
Jan
so after the unqualified success of my last review ( green book ) l thought that l would try again .
l went to see ford versus ferrari / le mans 66 according to where you live .
now l am no petrol head and talk of motor racing usually makes my eyes glaze over but this film is about much more than laps on a circuit .
A Brummie is someone born in Birmingham , Staffordshire . Most residents of Sutton Coldfield like to think that they are posh and disassociate themselves from Brum , right Stan ?
Please guys don't give away any more of the plot , let folks see it for themselves .
Jan
so after the unqualified success of my last review ( green book ) l thought that l would try again .
l went to see ford versus ferrari / le mans 66 according to where you live .
now l am no petrol head and talk of motor racing usually makes my eyes glaze over but this film is about much more than laps on a circuit .
Yes actually from Sutton Coldfield , so as a Brummie myself that is a tick straight away .
Jan
so after the unqualified success of my last review ( green book ) l thought that l would try again .
l went to see ford versus ferrari / le mans 66 according to where you live .
now l am no petrol head and talk of motor racing usually makes my eyes glaze over but this film is about much more than laps on a circuit .
No , this is based on the true story of the attempt by Ford Motors to build a car to beat Ferrari at the 1966 Le Mans .
lt stays quite true to the actual events only abridging them to get them into what is still over 2 hours of film . 99% 0f the characters are real people and it is , I M H O , a really good watch .
Jan
