I'm sorry it took me so long to respond.
You said....
Problem,
You wrote: kicking the men out of your home for perverting the word of God after you invited them in and they came back.....was a dick move.
Those two were almost certainly not coming back again anyway. And I had just read them Paul's words saying those who preach a Good News different from that which the apostles preached are to be condemned. So I codemned them for doing it. I wanted to impress upon them the seriousness of what they were doing, corrupting the Good News of Jesus Christ.
The truth is, I didn't want to talk to either of them again anyway until they considered the possibility that they were following false teachers. And I told them that. I showed them some "tough love" and that is exactly what I think they both needed.
Hello CG,
While I still consider myself a Christian, I am probably making peace more with the loss of the religion of my youth, than I am making a bridge to my creator. So i would say, I'm leaning agnostic. I think your actions were not "tough love", but self fullfilling. Don't take that as an insult please. You are human like everyone else. You have neither the ability nor authority to condemn anyone. I doubt very much that wratcheting up the rhetoric in the end did anything but strengthen their resolve when they went back and were eased in conscience by the Watchtower librarys retort on the matter.
I was once a JW apologist. You know what stuck in my head? The kindness and LOGIC of those i spoke with in tandem. Some things I defended, bu the arguement stuck in the back of my mind. The way of the zealot is not the way to convery JW's to your religion or away from theres. An olive branch and kindness in the moment of cognative dissonance can prove much more effective than the boot in the ass.
Jus tmy thoughts of course. i am sure you acted in accord with your conscience.