Posts by Simon

11530

It's been a long 9 years Lloyd Evans / John Cedars

by Newly Enlightened in

original reddit post (removed).

Simon

Yes, obviously very contrived. It's like he's latched onto the green-screen thing as finally being something he feels confident to deny and trying to make out that is the entirety of the criticism levelled at him.

All a distraction to divert attention from more important matters and the information coming out.

The only remotely relevant part to it is that someone has such low self-esteem, or cares so little about women, that he's happy to work for such a character. Any man with any balls would tell the slimy perv to stick his job.

Sorry Tibor, you're fucking your own future by going on the record as being of low moral fibre.

21

Who is partaking of the upcoming memorial in April 15, 2022

by bola in

i am plan to partake of the emblem for the first time.

i have informed my elders of my heavenly call during the time they met with me for my reinstatement last year on june, 2022. i informed my congo secretary also.

who else is intending to partake.

Simon

Why would anyone even want to visit a KH after 5 years out?

Freaky!

11530

It's been a long 9 years Lloyd Evans / John Cedars

by Newly Enlightened in

original reddit post (removed).

Simon

Isn't it odd that we had someone earlier downvoting posts critical of Lloyd, who's apparently distanced himself from him (John Redwood account / Mark Odonnell?), but there he was supporting him (as non-visibly as he could). Or else it was Lloyd who had access to the account <- what I believe.

Now we have another of Lloyds cronies doing his bidding or perhaps lending his "identity" for Lloyd to be able to post. Because the language sounds an awful lot like it's really Lloyd speaking.

Sorry "Tibor", but when you chose to work with a sneaky fucker, you get treated like a sneaky fucker.

If you think that lard-arse values you, try walking away and see what his T-Shirt says then. You're being played like a violin. Stop being a doormat.

11530

It's been a long 9 years Lloyd Evans / John Cedars

by Newly Enlightened in

original reddit post (removed).

Simon

Also "Tibor", FYI: the "green screen conspiracy" was literally a handful of posts out of 136 pages of posts.

You have now posted more than anyone about it. But you're not going to post anymore. Is that your plan? Derail the topic with a non-issue that no-one really cares about? Post endlessly about the green-screen to try to actually make the topic about it?

You really think that's the "new low"? Not the years of cheating on his wife with prostitutes, including in countries where many are abused as kids and trafficked? Not the sexting girls on the internet and accusations of meeting up with one? Not the ripping people off and doxxing them?

You're a pathetic worm. If you're not Lloyd, you're so far up his asshole that you've become part of him.

11530

It's been a long 9 years Lloyd Evans / John Cedars

by Newly Enlightened in

original reddit post (removed).

Simon

Hi everyone! Tibor, Lloyd's video editor here

Hi Lloyd.

11530

It's been a long 9 years Lloyd Evans / John Cedars

by Newly Enlightened in

original reddit post (removed).

Simon

Why did I always imagine you with a scally accent (The Wirrel style)with a dry sense of humour

OK, I've had some insults in my time but this ... THIS ... takes the biscuit! LOL

The Wirrel is Scouse to us, the only time I speak like that is for comedic effect ("eh, de doo do don't di doh?") because I'm 100% pure Mancunian.

Think Oasis :)

33

Response to "The Flood is Real, Because ..."

by Simon in

i remember one of the flowchart responses to people questioning the biblical flood was something along the lines that "every culture has a flood story".. of course, nearly everywhere has flooded at one time or another and we know there are minor floods and then there are the 1-in-1000 year kind of weather event, that tend to get a mention (anyone from the uk will still talk about the summer of '76, and that's probably nothing in comparison to a decent flood).. but the inference is that the flood must be real, because every culture has a flood story.. the best response is "now do dragons".. because apparently, nearly every culture also has a dragon legend.. does it mean dragons exist?

some desperate jw may show their ignorance by suggesting that man lived at the same time as dinosaurs and they are what the stories were based on.

fun fact: stegosaurus was a fossil when t-rex was alive for longer than it's been since t-rex has been a fossil to us - we're talking old, and no overlap (ignore the map in the cover of the old green bible).. do jws still even bother trying to defend the cray-cray aesop-fable kind of ot beliefs?.

Simon

I remember one of the flowchart responses to people questioning the biblical flood was something along the lines that "every culture has a flood story".

Of course, nearly everywhere has flooded at one time or another and we know there are minor floods and then there are the 1-in-1000 year kind of weather event, that tend to get a mention (anyone from the UK will still talk about the summer of '76, and that's probably nothing in comparison to a decent flood).

But the inference is that the flood must be real, because every culture has a flood story.

The best response is "now do dragons".

Because apparently, nearly every culture also has a dragon legend.

Does it mean dragons exist? Some desperate JW may show their ignorance by suggesting that man lived at the same time as Dinosaurs and they are what the stories were based on. Fun fact: Stegosaurus was a fossil when T-Rex was alive for longer than it's been since T-Rex has been a fossil to us - we're talking OLD, and no overlap (ignore the map in the cover of the old green bible).

Do JWs still even bother trying to defend the cray-cray aesop-fable kind of OT beliefs?

https://allthatsinteresting.com/dragon-legends

11530

It's been a long 9 years Lloyd Evans / John Cedars

by Newly Enlightened in

original reddit post (removed).

Simon

Simon, a lot of them have been trafficked into it as well. I was watching Underage, Undercover on Discovery+ and it was a huge eye-opener. Girls being targeted between the ages of 12-15, perverts getting CSAM from them, to sell to other perverts.

Yeah, from what I've read recently I think there's an incredibly high probability (i.e. effectively a certainty) that anyone visiting prostitutes is raping someone, possibly a victim of child abuse. Whatever they tell themselves about it being consensual is just lies, because they don't know and don't bother to know.

Also interesting is how the prevalence of prostitution (when its legalized or decriminalized) results in huge upticks in rapes and violence against all women. There are lots of myths about the whole thing, the reality is not at all like how some portray it.

This is a SICK trade that only a true misogynist would be involved in.

11530

It's been a long 9 years Lloyd Evans / John Cedars

by Newly Enlightened in

original reddit post (removed).

Simon

I am quite freaked out in this forum as to how well you all seem to know the "real Lloyd"

He used this forum to promote his site when he first started. I can't remember if he was already out at that point (heck, I don't really know if he's genuinely "out" even now, LOL) but he gave us all early access to how he worked and what he was like.

Very stubborn, childish, thin skinned, manipulative, frames criticism as an attack to claim he's the "victim" and generally dismissive of anyone else's opinion, concerns and privacy.

He seems to generate a constant whirlwind of drama and controversy and I haven't fully made my mind up yet if that is an act to create publicity in order to grow an audience for $$$ or if he's just a dysfunctional character who doesn't know how to act appropriately.

But safe to say, this is a Lloyd-free zone, and while we don't mind a robust debate on pretty much any topic going as long as it's interesting, we try to keep things friendly and cordial if we can.

11530

It's been a long 9 years Lloyd Evans / John Cedars

by Newly Enlightened in

original reddit post (removed).

Simon

You are a beautiful woman and if you wanted to go into another relationship with someone else, I guarantee you, you will have no problems whatsoever.

I know you mean well with that comment, but I would suggest people don't get into relationships with anyone simply based on physical attraction, whether that is because you find someone else attractive or your rely too much on your own looks to attract someone. You should want someone who values you for who you are, who finds you intellectually stimulating and will want to be with you when your looks are something you both remind yourself about with old photos.

Marrying for looks is a fools game that leaves people with someone who'll forever be looking over your shoulder to see if there is a better deal now available. It's no better than marrying based on someone's "spirituality" - it's not going to create a good marriage. Contrary to JW folk lore, marriage is not a 3 strand cord and if it is, whatever that 3rd cord is, is going to rip it apart. It should be you and them, just 2 people, united.

I know that sounds ridiculously old fashioned, but IMO it's true and women shouldn't be told that their value comes down to their attractiveness.