Science has proven beyond 20 wks a baby can.
The left is the party of science denial. They live in their own fantasy world. You should hear their theories on economics and climate ...
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
Science has proven beyond 20 wks a baby can.
The left is the party of science denial. They live in their own fantasy world. You should hear their theories on economics and climate ...
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
Oh quite calling all abortions “ killing babies”.
I don't. But it's not accurate to say none are babies. It's you people that want to defend baby killing up to the point of birth. So quit pretending that all abortions are early fetuses ...
There is no chance of fetal viability or fetal pain till like the 20 week and the vast majority are preformed during first trimester.
Then make something around that time the legal limit, maybe 18 to be safe. Simple and something everyone can agree on, right?
Or are you going to insist you die on the democrat's "we must kill babies up-to birth?" hill for idiots?
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
Why do you assume people who object to killing babies have to be religious?
While there are often some overlaps in opinions between groups, being religious is not a pre-requisite for caring about the welfare of unborn babies, or any other lives for that matter.
And poverty is less to do with having children and more todo with corrupt economics, very often tied to the very socialist groups that push for abortions to be overused.
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
He's assuming that people believe god directly causes every single thing that happens. I'm not sure that's what most religious people believe. It would mean there was no free will to make choices, we'd all be just puppets.
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
During the 9-month period inside the womb of my mother, I was just that, a pre-birth fetus.
No, you weren't. You were a baby for a significant part of it, with heartbeat, brain, and nervous system. You could respond to touch and music.
Science denier.
original reddit post (removed).
Eh,... Simon. You may have misunderstood. 🤭
Well, Boris just resigned, so maybe I was on to something ...
original reddit post (removed).
Boris Johnson currently doing Lloyd Evans in the UK.
That's a sex scandal I wasn't expecting!
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
I don't care if you go pork three women, two men, five goats, and a horse all at the same time. I may care about the animals - they didn't consent.
I heard some people get off by pumping helium into farm animals. I say, whatever floats your goat! (boom-tish)
Sorry, I rarely get to use that joke and it's the closest opening I've seen.
what makes you think giving more people access to affordable insurance would bring down average life expectancy?
It didn't, so it doesn't.
Like most things, the name on the tin is the exact opposite of what it was - it didn't make anything more affordable.
In fact, the government mandated that healthcare providers implement various electronic records which have been an expensive catastrophe of catastrophic proportions.
The US spends more on the "healthcare industry" than ever before, but that extra money isn't going on patient care, it's feeding the various parasites devouring the host.
wt claims that satan was thrown out of heaven in october 1914 precipitating ww!
and the end times.
a small problem with that is ww1 started on july 28th 1914 whilst satan was still in heaven picking his nose.. how did we not see this and waste years of precious life?
This shit is done.
Way too much crappy-pasting going on, way too little actual discussion.
Every time I allow religiots some freedom I regret it.
No restraint, no filter.