Ross,
I feel I must press for further clarification.
If you don't mind, please could you provide the source for this belief:
Usually I'm not that keen on basing my beliefs on The Apocalypse, however: Rev.5:12; 13:8 and others.
Ok. I perhaps didn't ask the question clearly enough. You indicated that he was slain somehow prior to it happening in the real world. That was the part I wanted to ask about. Where is that particular idea from? How can you say it happened somewhere other than the real world and then happened in the real world. Does the bible indicate this timeline for events?
Are you suggesting that God chooses those who will be "born again" and leaves everyone else to their own devices?
Paul was of that opinion.
Now that isn't answering my question. I asked if it was YOUR opinion.
Sure. We love whom we love, and don't love whom we don't love. Isn't that our choice to make? Would we therefore permit God less freedom than we allow ourselves?
Well for a starter I don't think that loving someone always involves a choice. Just my opinion of course. Also, would we choose not to love our own offspring? Effectively that is what the god of the bible is doing if he chooses not to love some of us.
I would imagine that the only people who don't love their own offspring are either generally horrible / unloving people, or they have a very very good reason to not love their child as much (e.g. their child was a serial killer). However, an all- knowing God should see the reasons behind actions (e.g. mental illness, effects of extreme abuse by someone else, etc.).
I read a book recently, I think entitled "we need to talk about Kevin" and it was about a woman whose son committed mass murder at school. He was unrepentant, but clearly mentally ill. Her poignant conclusion was that she still loved him, because he was her child.
I would not allow God more freedom to be unloving. No.
Sirona