retro -
Hi again Elephant
Circumstances don't dictate what people will become, true. Yet it's well researched and documented that prople raised in over-controlled (or micromanaged?) or abusive environments are more likely to become tyrants or victims themselves. Do you think we should just ignore this substantial risk?
Again, the word substantial does not denote absolute…but to follow your line of thinking, the effects of environments are in fact ill when they are abusive…say for example, a jail or a an underground bunker for imprisonment purposes…I wouldn’t rule out that there are extremist religions comparable to providing such environments…but its silly to compare the JWs to one of these…as far as I know, anyone can leave the religion without having to worry of being thrown in jail…
answer- not if you believe that it IS a satan dominated world...if you dont, it shouldnt be much of a problem...
It's not that simple; there are many stages a person goes through when changing a fundamental belief. Also if the person has been isolated from that world. . .yes, it can be a big problem.
Well here is an idea I’m finding to be very predominant in these posts…that ‘freedom’ is a long and arduous task without any assurances that it can be attained…one that’s unconvincing…if ‘freedom’ is being dangled just outside of the religion, why is it so hard to attain, yet JW’s will convincingly (and happily) repeat to you that they are in fact free…
I'm puzzled! Where have I argued in favour of mind control? Choice or not is addressed above.
Sorry, others’ argument for mind control…
...or ...your eye has become simple after all...
Now if I were a JW that would be a compliment, I think. As it is I'll just say that argument by . . . is pretty simple too, and I've seen it before here.
…a simple eye denotes a simple mind, no? are you not looking for a simple resolution to this conundrum of elusive freedom?
By the way, I appreciate your continuing responses…
Christ alone- (This is in reference to your previous response)
Hebrews 1:1-4
New International Version (NIV)
After he had provided purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven. 4 So he became as much superior to the angels as the name he has inherited is superior to theirs.
-nowhere in this scripture does it say “ Jesus is not an angel”, in fact, it says he BECAME superior to the angels AS THE NAME became superior, drawing comparisons to its elevating state from previous spots on the totem pole…thus denoting various previous possibilities…
English Standard Version(©2001)And again, when he brings the firstborn into the world, he says, “Let all God’s angels worship him.”
-again, this scripture does not say “Jesus is not angel”.
So in summary, these scriptures are stating that Jesus (in relation to angels) BECAME superior to angels (just as I can be your superior in a company, though we are both still men) and that angels WORSHIP him, nothing more…
Now…you can INFER many different things from just these verses, just like I can…but neither you nor I can say here is FLAT proof that THIS is so…the scripture would have to say, “Jesus was never, is, never will be an angel”…everything else is interpretation…
…again, we can INFER a myriad of theories (beliefs for you and me) but that little word (faith) creeps into the equation yet again when it comes to defending said belief…
...in regards to your last post, i'm not quite seeing much a different understanding in regards to what Jesus represents as our saviour...you are correct, he is our saviour and it is through him that we can obtain salvation...i dont disagree with that.