Halcon: If you truly believe and understand this, then you would refrain from categorizing what God does or doesn't do as 'good' or 'bad' yourself.
I don't believe it, I am basing my comments on the view of a Christian who subscribes to the theory of divine command, where good and bad are based entirely on what God decides they are. I believe that it is possible to understand what makes an action moral or immoral; that there is a basis for determining this. That belief runs counter to the idea of divine command, so I am taking the divine command theory to its logical conclusion.
Halcon: You assume you understand what is the eternal future as God knows it.
I am basing my understanding on God's past actions and the notion that his nature does not change.
God is either predictable --with a past that gives us an understanding of what he is like-- or unpredictable. The latter runs into the issue that any action he takes is good, and thus he is capable of anything, regardless of how we might view that action. The former gives us an image of a person who expresses cruelty on a recurring basis.
I don't think the god-of-the-gaps argument works here. Either God is comprehensible to us, or he is not. Either way, we would be facing an uncertain and quite scary future if he was real.