Memorial partakers up.
That makes sense. After seeing those numbers, I bet a lot of JWs need a drink.
isn’t it about time they released the report for the service year?
or have they stopped publishing it?
did they released selected figures at the annual meeting as they usually do, such as the memorial attendance or record number of pioneers?
Memorial partakers up.
That makes sense. After seeing those numbers, I bet a lot of JWs need a drink.
short message of help showing forth the correct gospel for today.. the problem with mankind, the provision for mankind, and a promise to mankind.. jws teach that works save.
the bible says that only christ saves if we believe / trust upon him..
On the other hand, if we're more likely to be wrong no matter what we choose, then we may as well live it up before we get escorted to our eternal brimstone bedchambers.
were you ever on a congregation picnic?
i was on several occasions.. the arrangements were often announced from the platform after the closing song and prayer by the last elder up on the platform.. sometimes it was included in the service meeting announcements as "on saturday we're meeting at 10.00am at the kingdom hall for field service, and after field service for anyone who wishes, especially for the younger ones, we will be having a congregation picnic meeting at the beach carpark on seaview road.".
well, according to the new elders manual you won't be hearing those words again.
The worst issue we ever had was that one guy whose life apparently revolved around winning sandlot softball games, so he would turn every close play into a major argument.
Aside from that, I don't remember anything major happening, though I did hear about one elder (who had been a boxer in his youth) who clobbered a worldly guy who made a rude comment about his daughter.
i went back into this forum a little ways and found quite a bit of discussion on the walsh (1954) for those newly out or those who don't know of what i write, you should really check it out.
anyone who is a jw or studying with jw should see material from this trial.
my take away...the printed materials of the wtbts were to believed over the bible and if you didn't believe the wt teachings over the bible, ( even though they admit to false prophesy )you would be disfellowshipped and deserving of death.
Ray Franz had shown some of the Walsh trial transcripts in CoC. It was fascinating to see how easily the attorney got them to admit that the most important thing was that the rank and file accept what they were told, regardless of whether or not they believed it, and regardless of whether or not it was right.
I think what struck me the most was realizing just how they had been lying to us all those years. It is one thing for them to tell you who they are when in an environment that they control and where you cannot question them without suffering a severe penalty. But when they were in court and not allowed to tell blatant lies, they told a very different story. They know that they are lying to you. They think they have to.
The GB are the original Twitter- they thrive on followers, not on honesty or truth.
ask most fitness coaches, nutritionists or health professionals and they will tell you that weight control is about calories in versus calories out (cico).
after all, you can’t ignore the laws of thermodynamics!.
the flaw in this simplistic reasoning ought to be obvious; a human body and a steam engine are two different things.. our bodies have evolved complex systems of control and feedback loops in order to maintain a steady interior environment, also known as homeostasis.
The push towards more grains and carbs in the 70s, along with the war on cholesterol, helped usher in the age of type-2 diabetes. The continued demonization of meats and fats don't help, either.
As for energy-in/energy-out, I agree that it's too simple a model. I think we should be looking at what works for us and what doesn't. People lose weight and build healthy bodies on a seemingly endless array of diets and dietary approaches. So it seems as if they all work. I would say, find the commonalities, and also find what works for you. A diet that you cannot follow won't work, obviously.
Most dietary approaches will warn against processed foods and especially against foods with lots of sugar or starch. I think that's a good start. I've found that for me, it's not only sugar, but chocolate (specifically, milk-chocolate) that appears to have additional negative effects for me. So I've been cutting that out lately and my skin has been in much better shape than it has in some time.
Our bodies can adapt to a lot of approaches, but I think we each have our own specific needs. I am focused less on calories and more on finding ways to eat that work for me and in developing regular exercise habits. Try lots of stuff. Keep what works, discard what doesn't. Above all, don't punish yourself- your brain won't put up with that for long, and it's one reason that so many approaches fail.
regular pioneers: 600 per year, 50 on average per month.auxiliary pioneers: 30 hours per monthauxiliary pioneers in march and april: fee reduced to 15 hours.
ThomasMore: 2. Competive hierarchy that keeps the rank & file engaged
I think this is a big part of it, and I think they are also reaching a breaking point. The requirement that everyone go door-to-door and the encouragement for some to do X hours each month must be dragging the growth to enough of a degree that they keep finding ways to make the preaching work less onerous. But it's one of the ways to keep people busy and building up enough of a time investment so that they see it as a sunk cost.
So, if you weaken the requirements too much, the rank and file might lose enough focus to start wondering why they are doing it at all. But if you keep the reins tight, some will wear down or resist. It's a tricky balance, and I'm not sure there is a level where it works without some fallout. Or, they will keep pushing things to one end or the other, thus losing people faster each time. One can only hope.
.
not sure if this is fake news or not..
That's what I was thinking. What if she decides that she doesn't want to live the JW life, after so many years enjoying everything the world had to offer (and that she would have not been allowed to sample)? How bad would the PR be if she was DF?
I'm not moved, one way or another, by her decision. She's not the first famous person to either join the JWs or get baptized after years on the fence. I'm more intrigued by how things might go if a sufficiently famous person were to have a falling out with the organization. Or if she gets interviewed and caught by surprise by questions about CSA mishandling by the WTS...
regular pioneers: 600 per year, 50 on average per month.auxiliary pioneers: 30 hours per monthauxiliary pioneers in march and april: fee reduced to 15 hours.
I can't believe that I counted my hours so earnestly for so long. I could've been a star!
i’m a pimo ministerial servant and i won’t fade because i want to keep my front row seats watching what happens next few years.. my predictions are that this current governing body will slowly die off and the current younger helpers will be the next gb.
they will eventually have new light that they were wrong about 1914 and the overlapping generations.. the new light will be something on the lines of the last days are now because of king of north king of south pushing each other etc etc.
they will do their very best to burry old literature and try to change the past trying to make it sound like they were right all along just as they have done for 150 years now.
They lost a large proportion of followers in the early-to-mid 1920s, thanks to Rutherford publishing end-times predictions so frequently. It was something like 65% of the following, which splintered off into other groups (some of which remain active today, if I am not mistaken). But they managed to recover and grow.
Whether they can do it now, it's hard to say. Rutherford was the leader of the organization during his term, a sort of one-man FDS. So he could make changes more quickly and efficiently (granted, this was one reason why things went downhill at the start of his term). Also, there wasn't an internet where critics could reach a massive audience and virtually "confront" Rutherford and make a response necessary.
I think that the current GB may feel safe, now that they have the '2075 teaching.' They can keep the current ideas going until they pass away, and if the effect on the organization is disastrous, they won't be around to deal with it. Let the next group of GB members try to patch the hull of the sinking ship.
i’m a pimo ministerial servant and i won’t fade because i want to keep my front row seats watching what happens next few years.. my predictions are that this current governing body will slowly die off and the current younger helpers will be the next gb.
they will eventually have new light that they were wrong about 1914 and the overlapping generations.. the new light will be something on the lines of the last days are now because of king of north king of south pushing each other etc etc.
they will do their very best to burry old literature and try to change the past trying to make it sound like they were right all along just as they have done for 150 years now.
While I hope that they collapse soon, I am doubtful that it will happen so quickly. They are still flush with money and have a loyal base that should keep the numbers steady for a few years at least. I think it's more likely to be a slow process. But that also depends on how well they adapt to a changing world.
It's much easier now for people to learn about the WTS, including any doctrinal issues and the parts of the past that they seek to hide or ignore. I think that's one reason why so many young people --especially those born in-- leave the organization each year. The problems are out there to see, and the warnings sometimes make it seem as if they have something to hide (and a bit of searching shows that they do!).
They need to be able to manage the fact that people can now learn all about the organization's history before deciding to make a commitment. Can they do that? I'm not sure about the current GB. A new and younger GB, which is perhaps more tech-savvy, might come up with something that works. Or they could accelerate the decline. We'll see.