Sorry, I missed this response the first time around.
EisMe: Should prophecy be dismissed simply because it predates scientific methods, or does its alignment with global events demand consideration?
Vague statements that are open to wide interpretation are useless as prophecies, because they can only really be validated in hindsight. Thus, you cannot make reliable predictions from them, as we have seen happen repeatedly for centuries. Every time someone predicts the end of the world, they are wrong. At some point, one must accept that these predictions are based on writings that are being misinterpreted or misunderstood, or which are themselves wrong.
Because of this, it makes no sense to believe anyone who is predicting the future based on these writings. Dozens --if not hundreds, or even thousands-- of people have tried and gotten it wrong. The only way to know for sure is after it actually happens. Which, as I already pointed out, makes the whole endeavor moot.