It’s kind of a combination of “puffing” (in the legal sense), the common sense fallacy, making unfounded assertions and begging the question.
The WT’s use of “evidently” in their “explanation” of the “overlapping generation” teaching was what put it over the top for me.
I remember realizing it was all bullshit because they wrote “evidently” (which implies there was some evidence) but they never provided any.
It’s intellectually dishonest. They just make shit up and lie.
The example jwfacts cited in the OP smacks of bullying, manipulation and deceit when understood in light of the social dynamics of the JW religion. Seriously, who’s going to say during a WT study, or even privately to any elder, “I think it IS deniable that ‘Jehovah ... blesses the preaching work of Christian women and supports them in times of trial.’”?
No one ever.