slimboyfat
This is fairly late, by around 1 week I believe. Usually a new Study Watchtower is released on the last week of every month.
as an educated guess, the august 2024 watchtower may be delayed because 2 complicated subjects need to be discussed in this issue which haven't yet been approved to be included in the revised shepherding textbook.
perhaps the revised shepherding textbook must be finalised before this watchtower is released publicly.. the 2 subjects may be as follows:.
how to shepherd and appoint brothers based on the removal of the hour requirements, getting to know the brothers instead (does this mean prioritising appointing men who have auxiliary pioneered during the co visit and campaigns or men who are regular pioneers?).
slimboyfat
This is fairly late, by around 1 week I believe. Usually a new Study Watchtower is released on the last week of every month.
as an educated guess, the august 2024 watchtower may be delayed because 2 complicated subjects need to be discussed in this issue which haven't yet been approved to be included in the revised shepherding textbook.
perhaps the revised shepherding textbook must be finalised before this watchtower is released publicly.. the 2 subjects may be as follows:.
how to shepherd and appoint brothers based on the removal of the hour requirements, getting to know the brothers instead (does this mean prioritising appointing men who have auxiliary pioneered during the co visit and campaigns or men who are regular pioneers?).
This is my British sarcasm, I'm implying the stupidity of the existence of JWTalk as a pro JW website when despite all their convoluted explanations for having such a website, they're just as apostate as this website, if that comparison makes sense. No doubt the Organization is against the existence of the JWTalk website as well, which interestingly has HQ based in Russia 🤔🤔
as an educated guess, the august 2024 watchtower may be delayed because 2 complicated subjects need to be discussed in this issue which haven't yet been approved to be included in the revised shepherding textbook.
perhaps the revised shepherding textbook must be finalised before this watchtower is released publicly.. the 2 subjects may be as follows:.
how to shepherd and appoint brothers based on the removal of the hour requirements, getting to know the brothers instead (does this mean prioritising appointing men who have auxiliary pioneered during the co visit and campaigns or men who are regular pioneers?).
The pseudo-apostate JWtalk guys, who believe they're fully PIMI JWs when in fact the content of their site is a massive breeding ground for PIMQ and PIMO, often provide links which mine the website. They also appear to reveal confidential information publicly, very strange. Makes you wonder how much of a "threat" they are to Watchtower HQ.
I have obtained the link for the pdf of the August Watchtower study edition, nothing is showing as of yet. When it does it will appear in this link.
https://d34ji3l0qn3w2t.cloudfront.net/79eb032e-d5ac-4af9-bbeb-97738cb3970d/1/w_E_202408.pdf
as an educated guess, the august 2024 watchtower may be delayed because 2 complicated subjects need to be discussed in this issue which haven't yet been approved to be included in the revised shepherding textbook.
perhaps the revised shepherding textbook must be finalised before this watchtower is released publicly.. the 2 subjects may be as follows:.
how to shepherd and appoint brothers based on the removal of the hour requirements, getting to know the brothers instead (does this mean prioritising appointing men who have auxiliary pioneered during the co visit and campaigns or men who are regular pioneers?).
Read in between the lines.
I don't believe they are trying to time the release to coincide with the annual meeting.
It appears more likely that they're waiting for approval for new information in the upcoming revision of the Shepherding Textbook and perhaps in line with any "new" information which may (we don't know) be released in the June GB update.
All we need to do is keep speculating until everything is revealed!
as an educated guess, the august 2024 watchtower may be delayed because 2 complicated subjects need to be discussed in this issue which haven't yet been approved to be included in the revised shepherding textbook.
perhaps the revised shepherding textbook must be finalised before this watchtower is released publicly.. the 2 subjects may be as follows:.
how to shepherd and appoint brothers based on the removal of the hour requirements, getting to know the brothers instead (does this mean prioritising appointing men who have auxiliary pioneered during the co visit and campaigns or men who are regular pioneers?).
I'm thinking many of us are going in the wrong direction here. I believe this is a very unusual move and it's paving the way for a change in how the wives of appointed brothers serve in the congregation. Remember, nothing that Elders or Ministerial Servants do in the congregation in general has a scriptural basis. The Scriptures are clear that the first century christian women had a lot more influence in congregations than JWs and many churches today currently make out. Perhaps JWs will go down that route again to "reexamine the first century Christians" and start giving women more assignments. I see big announcements coming our way, just wait for the jealous PIMI sisters who have no husbands or whose husbands aren't appointed!! More factions await us!
i want to illustrate my point about where many x-jws go wrong.
to illustrate, imagine a morbidly obese person goes on a calorie restricted diet.
subsequently he loses the excess calories and his health improves.
as an educated guess, the august 2024 watchtower may be delayed because 2 complicated subjects need to be discussed in this issue which haven't yet been approved to be included in the revised shepherding textbook.
perhaps the revised shepherding textbook must be finalised before this watchtower is released publicly.. the 2 subjects may be as follows:.
how to shepherd and appoint brothers based on the removal of the hour requirements, getting to know the brothers instead (does this mean prioritising appointing men who have auxiliary pioneered during the co visit and campaigns or men who are regular pioneers?).
An intriguing photo. Wouldn't it be unusual if the delay is because all the JWs in the image have been DFd and they'll have to redo the image or they'll move the artwork onto another month anyway to pave the way for articles relating to the DF arrangement. It's an unusual cover article if the series are mainly about Disfellowshipping, unless it's a decoy to distract worldly people from reading it, and it's referenced only in one article.
as an educated guess, the august 2024 watchtower may be delayed because 2 complicated subjects need to be discussed in this issue which haven't yet been approved to be included in the revised shepherding textbook.
perhaps the revised shepherding textbook must be finalised before this watchtower is released publicly.. the 2 subjects may be as follows:.
how to shepherd and appoint brothers based on the removal of the hour requirements, getting to know the brothers instead (does this mean prioritising appointing men who have auxiliary pioneered during the co visit and campaigns or men who are regular pioneers?).
As an educated guess, the August 2024 Watchtower may be delayed because 2 complicated subjects need to be discussed in this issue which haven't yet been approved to be included in the revised Shepherding Textbook. Perhaps the revised Shepherding Textbook must be finalised before this Watchtower is released publicly.
The 2 subjects may be as follows:
How to shepherd and appoint brothers based on the removal of the hour requirements, getting to know the brothers instead (does this mean prioritising appointing men who have auxiliary pioneered during the CO visit and campaigns or men who are regular pioneers?)
- Does this mean that they cannot decide whether or not to add a supplementary article and/or question box to add as a reference in a revised Shepherding Textbook? Also, why is there an additional change to the 2025 Kingdom Ministry school to include elders and MS wives for final two talks? Is there going to be new direction that will allow wives of appointed men to also have assignments at the Kingdom Hall??? If this proves true, a past speculation about this will have come true.
How to handle disfellowshippings and reinstatements in light of the new direction from the GB update, as well as further emphasis about the personal invitation and simple greeting JWs can give DFd individuals at the Hall.
- Legally, this is going to look messy for the Governing Body. More pressure is coming upon them to relax the DF rules in Europe and other areas like Japan, so are they waiting for court rulings to ultimately change how they implement decisions regarding disfellowshipping? They promised JWs that the GB update adjustments to how JWs view disfellowshippings would be included in future series of Watchtower articles. This edition of the Watchtower may be the crucial edition which has been delayed due to legal issues. Will a further Governing Body Update this month provide extra direction regarding disfellowshipping and perhaps any changes to how elders recommend, appoint or delete brothers as has been speculated in the past, albeit by the "10 year plan guy", but hey it seems to be going in that direction!
The plot thickens.
2024-06-june-s-147-english- announcements and reminders.. let me know if you need it in a different language and i'll.
https://pdfupload.io/docs/e297b0ec.
i'll take a supreme pizza with all the extras!.
I have no connections with Bethel, but my educated guess assumes that the August edition of the Watchtower has been delayed because the Governing Body haven't decided on how to manage these areas:
How to shepherd and appoint brothers based on the removal of the hour requirements, getting to know the brothers instead (does this mean prioritising appointing men who have auxiliary pioneered during the CO visit and campaigns or men who are regular pioneers?)
How to handle disfellowshippings and reinstatements in light of the new direction from the GB update, as well as further emphasis about the personal invitation and simple greeting JWs can give DFd individuals at the Hall.
Admittedly, the Governing Body have made too many changes about various things in such a short space of time. This has no doubt increased their workload, which they continue to ignore as a potential burnout for many of the high ups in the Organization.
If the Governing Body make more changes this year, especially if a significant one occurs in the June 2024 GB update, I'll feel so sad for all the zealous PIMIs, trying to keep up with the "chariot" when in fact they're running in a hamster wheel.
Too many changes in one year is how I view this year for JWs, if the GB keep up their act and it carries on a few more years, we will see many more burn out and leave. I somehow wonder if they'll go so far as to change everything to be closer to a mainstream religion like the LDS church, 2 cults who enjoy copying eachother.
hi pepeep am attempting to get a current list of uk travelling overseers.
left 4 years ago and have heard rumours of many new ones.
.