While I respect Bill's intentions to protect children, I still remain unclear how mandatory reporting of these allegations to the authorities respects a victim's right to their dignity if they feel too embarrassed over what happened or if it is their desire not to testify in court. I realize that it is extremely important to get child molesters out of society, but prosecuting these individuals and protecting other children must be balanced with the protecting of the mental and emotional health of the victims.
You have a very good point there. I did not think of it from that angle. You are right, the wishes of the victim must be taken into account.
I believe the Society's stating clearly they will not discourage victims of abuse from going to the authorities was a significant step.I agree.
I also would like to see CONVICTED molesters banned from the door to door work. While a convicted molester is required to work only with an elder, this still does not sit well with me and neither would it with the public. Anyone being investigated by the authorities for crimes of this nature should have all "privileges" suspended until proven innocent of the charges.After meditating on your statement here, I have to agree. It is very dangerous as we meet all kinds of people, older ones, women, and even children at the doors. I know that, personally, I would not appreciate a child molestor coming to my door, even if he is with an elder.
I don't know if anyone has mentioned it before, but i believe a major problem is Christianity itself and the teachings that all sins can be forgiven on the basis of Christ's sacrifice. While I respect people's right to believe this, this particular doctrine appears to present a conflict in the Church. Since Christ's sacrifice supposedly covers over the most horrible of crimes, how does the Church deal with "forgiving" these men who have been convicted of abuse crimes and served their sentences?I don't see it as a problem. Jesus gave his life so that all our sins can be forgiven, but even if we are forgiven, we must face the consequences of our actions. Jehovah balances his perfect love with justice. Even in judicial cases, an unrepentant sinner is said to be disfellowshipped as a protection to the flock. Jesus sacrifice would cover that sin, if the person was to eventually show repentance. Even at that, Jehovah's flock would have to be protected. This is the case of a molestor. Reform is possible, repentance of course would have to be shown and Jesus sacrifice would cover the sin, but the congregation must still be protected from the sinners tendencies.