hi guys.
it's been about 4 or 5 weeks since i was disfellowshipped.
so far it's been easy, i enjoyed being left alone, no one bothering me, no one telling me i need to do more, need to reach out, questioning why i didnt go on the ministry, and the fact that my ex-wifes family cant talk to me even if they wanted to.
Giordano - Something else occur's to me re your attendance at their KH. Will it reinforce that the JW's are a part of her life and she has her father's approval by virtue of his regular attendance? Will it bother her that no one talks to her Dad?
Would it be better to simply expose her to the great life you are going to live?
I would have to agree.
my brother (a jw for 30 years) and i purchased a duplex.
he lives in one house, i live in the other, our common area separating both houses is the backyard.
we both can see each other's house across our common backyard.
never a jw - If my estimates help me right, it wasn't 10 minutes before the text, it was more like 1/2 hour of socializing
Your brother must be really "zealous" :D
never a jw - JW's are usually quite pleasant, as long as they don't turn on their doom-and-gloom-for-everyone-but-us switch. I actually will consider bringing some nice pastries filled with apostate poison.
Be careful :D They might think you're responding to the 'truth."
No, seriously, they might... They are often told that when somebody is showing kindness to Jehovah's Witnesses—as opposed to persecuting them (because... you know... everybody is persecuting them)—then that person must be interested in the "truth."
Darryl - By the way has there ever been anyone in history who was not aux or reg pioneering that when asked that question-how long did you plan on being out this morning responded "At least till 2:30 3:00."
When I was still an active unbaptised publisher, I would actually respond by saying, "At least until [time]," hoping that the person I'm talking to would be willing to preach with me for at least a bit longer. I was actually quite "zealous" as for an unbaptised publisher when I thought it was the "truth." Once I spent the whole Christmas break preaching as a 16-year-old. I think I got 50 hours in two weeks. But when I found out I was wrong... well... it was either "Quit!!!" or "Be deceived."
just following the "worst-district-convention-ever" there's a lot of frightened jw's worriedly and eagerly excited about the "great tribulationnnnn-tam-tam-tammmmm" starting.
it's the talk of the town in jw land.. today, my wife is off to the sunday meeting and an after-spiritual-banquet-get-together for the speaker.
i'm staying home for this one.
Maybe it's not for Armageddon but simply for a potential disaster? But I guess it'd be weird searching for a survival kit right after this convention's "bunker" video...
i just read the scripture then went and checked in thier older bible and it read the same so i check the greek interlinear and yes they changed john 3:16 .
the verse reads "all who believe in him should not perish but have everlasting life" the cult version says "exercising faith in him might not be destroyed but have everlasting life".. so not only do they say one must exercise faith meaning having to work for it but also they changed should not perish but having everlasting life to might not be destroyed again making a caveat where one does not exist.
just to add to the point verse 18 in both bibles says the one having faith is not judged, totally blowing up thier version of 16 but of course they change 18 to say exercising faith too but it makes little difference, since it says not judged.
Finkelstein - Oewwww...... can you see and smell the corruption ?
No. But I can smell the dinner. Dinner is more important. (Soooorryyyyy.....)
my brother (a jw for 30 years) and i purchased a duplex.
he lives in one house, i live in the other, our common area separating both houses is the backyard.
we both can see each other's house across our common backyard.
blondie - Did I say these same people would stop at 11:00 for a long breakfast and make an rv on the way home and count 3 hours.
That's how it was... I always tried to count my time genuinely, so, while also attending school, I'd get maybe barely 10 hours a month. I was often afraid that an elder would approach me about my time... If I said to him that it was because of how the other publishers wanted to socialise instead of actually preach, I'd probably be told to also go out on other days... And then I'd have to remind him that I have school, so Sundays are fine for meetings but not also preaching because I'd need to study... And then he'd say how good it was that I was just finishing high school, so I could focus on preaching then instead of university or college...
Their brains are wired in a weird, unknown-to-me way.
i just read the scripture then went and checked in thier older bible and it read the same so i check the greek interlinear and yes they changed john 3:16 .
the verse reads "all who believe in him should not perish but have everlasting life" the cult version says "exercising faith in him might not be destroyed but have everlasting life".. so not only do they say one must exercise faith meaning having to work for it but also they changed should not perish but having everlasting life to might not be destroyed again making a caveat where one does not exist.
just to add to the point verse 18 in both bibles says the one having faith is not judged, totally blowing up thier version of 16 but of course they change 18 to say exercising faith too but it makes little difference, since it says not judged.
DATA-DOG - Are we arguing about whether or not the Bible is accurate [...]?
Nobody is arguing that.
hi guys.
it's been about 4 or 5 weeks since i was disfellowshipped.
so far it's been easy, i enjoyed being left alone, no one bothering me, no one telling me i need to do more, need to reach out, questioning why i didnt go on the ministry, and the fact that my ex-wifes family cant talk to me even if they wanted to.
By the way, if it came to that, keep in mind that, as I understand it, you could use this incident in court to show how shunning policies—and how the organisation in general—are badly affecting your daughter.
hi guys.
it's been about 4 or 5 weeks since i was disfellowshipped.
so far it's been easy, i enjoyed being left alone, no one bothering me, no one telling me i need to do more, need to reach out, questioning why i didnt go on the ministry, and the fact that my ex-wifes family cant talk to me even if they wanted to.
It's unbelievable of your ex-wife to be so... well, you know the rest. You were obviously caring for your daughter. She's your daughter, too... Does she not care about that at all? (Sorry, I'm forgetting that people are not rational beings...)
When it comes to not having friends... I'd argue that you do have friends here. Of course, we're not real friends since we've never met, but we do care about each other's lives after leaving the cult. If you disappeared from the forum, I can guarantee you that some of us would notice that you stopped being involved here. Still, having no actual contact besides the Internet, we wouldn't assume you were dead. :D
Anyway, keep in mind that it's not worth joining them back. You see what they're doing. The elders whispering about you...? What right do they have? Do they not see that what just happened was a parent caring for his daughter? Well, Jehovah's Witnesses are that way. They don't see things until they are told.
If you want to be reinstated, many ex-Jehovah's Witnesses do it as well for the sake of having contact with family. But try not to forget in the meantime that this cult is... just a cult. A cult that has no power over you. Show them that you are a confident, thinking and well-meaning individual.
i just read the scripture then went and checked in thier older bible and it read the same so i check the greek interlinear and yes they changed john 3:16 .
the verse reads "all who believe in him should not perish but have everlasting life" the cult version says "exercising faith in him might not be destroyed but have everlasting life".. so not only do they say one must exercise faith meaning having to work for it but also they changed should not perish but having everlasting life to might not be destroyed again making a caveat where one does not exist.
just to add to the point verse 18 in both bibles says the one having faith is not judged, totally blowing up thier version of 16 but of course they change 18 to say exercising faith too but it makes little difference, since it says not judged.
Crazyguy - Saename, we shouldn't argue over the merits of the gospels and which ones are more reliable because they can all be easily shown to be in error.
Well, yeah, I agree. I was just pointing out that the gospel of John is the least reliable one if one wants to see what Jesus believed. But I guess it was pretty much off the topic, so I'm sorry about that :D
DATA-DOG, scholars generally agree that both Jesus and Paul *likely* existed.
i stopped in to see if that are any overwhelming statistics, stories or feedback from people regarding the 2016 district convention.....haven't seen much...... any stories or threads?.
steve2 - The GB know very well the organization is in extremely hot water over its shocking policies on and procedures for responding to child sexual abuse in the local congregations. How many rank and file Witnesses know that?
I would assume that not many know of it. I remember, when I was still active, hearing a comment made by one sister during a meeting. She criticised other religions for child sexual abuse—mainly the Roman Catholic church—and then said that Jehovah's Witnesses don't have that problem. She said that "we" don't have to worry about it because, allegedly, Jehovah takes care of his organisation. I still didn't know about the issue at the time, so I was willing to believe it. The problem is that none of us checked the news to see whether that's the case. She was really making an uninformed statement based on her research which... well... was based on what the Governing Body said. (Remember Stephen Lett calling child sexual abuse "apostate-driven lies"?)
I'm glad I checked the issue myself later on when I heard Anders Andersen talking about it on another website. I heard of it even before that, but I refused to believe it since the "apostates" that were saying it were really aggressive about it. That attitude just confirmed my "conviction." But then I read Anders Andersen's posts about child sexual abuse, and I saw that he was just stating the facts while not being aggressive or insulting. Then I searched the news and watched the Australian Royal Commission.
So... based on my experience, not many know of the child sexual abuse. Unfortunately.
