Rem,
I'm not trying to be rude or anything, but why does it matter so much to you how I choose to define my own perceptions? I have made no attempt to convince you or anyone else that my way of seeing things is the only way (I'm a Wiccan, not a Fundy), and I wouldn't dream of doing so. The only thing I really want is to be listened to fairly, honestly, and with an open mind. No, I don't ask or expect anyone to quit being an atheist. All I want if for the atheists to realize that having a spiritual side doesn't make a person ignorant, irrational, stupid or inferior. It's how you act upon it that defines such things.
For about the thousandth time, I think that science is wonderful, and I see no conflict at all between science and spirituality. Nor do I see why one should have to supplant the other. They are two completely different things, and one should not be used to define the other... although I do believe that science can enhance one's spiritual life if you keep an open mind. I believe in evolution, I don't think the earth is 6,000 years old, and I have an interest in quantum theory. How, exactly, does the fact that I choose to define certain things using spiritual terms make my views less valid than yours? I wouldn't be surprised at all if we believe a lot of the same things, but only choose different means of expressing our ideas.
I hope you'll answer the question posed in my "How do you define spirituality?" thread. I'd like to discuss the issue further in less confrontational territory.
*Rochelle.
---------
"Most men complacently accept 'knowledge' as 'truth'. They are sheep, ruled by fear."
-- Sydney Losstarot, "Vagrant Story."