@freemindfade is right with his point. To deny it is would be terribly naive.
Nobody hates you for being superstitious. Stop being so paranoid.
@cofty always gotta get a shot in..."being superstitious" Simply saying "nobody hates you" would suffice.
look, now before i speak, i want to say that it is very okay for someone to not believe.
are they hurting anyone?
killing anyone?
@freemindfade is right with his point. To deny it is would be terribly naive.
Nobody hates you for being superstitious. Stop being so paranoid.
@cofty always gotta get a shot in..."being superstitious" Simply saying "nobody hates you" would suffice.
anyone else also hold this view or understand it at least, or do you feel the need to argue that both can in no way coexist?.
I read @cofty pretty well let me translate this statement:
Yes there is a very long journey to the first cell but every step is being investigated.
Yes we don't know how the first cell formed but don't worry about that Evolution is FACT.
anyone else also hold this view or understand it at least, or do you feel the need to argue that both can in no way coexist?.
The amount of deflection by the hardline evolutionists folks is astounding. Pose a tough question or one you really can't solve at least not yet and what do you get?
"you're asking the wrong question", "you don't understand the question", "you're not being clear", "you're talking in circles and not making sense"
I could go on and on.
It's o.k. we get it you don't have the answer to these perplexing questions anymore than scientists who have dedicated their lives to these very things.
Just say I DON'T KNOW!
as i said last night the smell of pus from an infection is recognized by all puppies without their being exposed to the smell previously, this is shown because all puppies react the same way to this smell, which is to lick the infected pus laden wound.. this demonstrates that smells are carried on dna in some way.
any thoughts on how?.
I've asked a 100 times for Cofty Viviane and other to explain the biochemical charge and all I get are crickets.
They simply can't bring themselves to say "I don't know" or "I can't explain it".
It is the Holy Grail related to Evolution. If they are so separate why was Darwin so interested in the Origin?
Because it matters. Admit it and move on...
anyone else also hold this view or understand it at least, or do you feel the need to argue that both can in no way coexist?.
Can we get @Crabby on the ballot? Just sayin....
anyone else also hold this view or understand it at least, or do you feel the need to argue that both can in no way coexist?.
Witnesses are not allowed to take SAT's, thus they can be retarded and have plausible deniability that they are geniuses
...gotta be honest this @Crabby guy is crushing it LOL.
if i go to my profile page and click on "see topics posted on," .
the system returns .
"bad request the browser (or proxy) sent a request that this server could not understand.
@Simon quit updating stuff LOL. ....the pains of advancement :)
anyone else also hold this view or understand it at least, or do you feel the need to argue that both can in no way coexist?.
example @Viviane comment.
"Your comments are unfounded, baseless and unscientific"
rinse repeat.
Anyone of you care to share your SAT score, IQ, Portfolio. I bet a lot of the ppl you call stupid are probably not so stupid.
anyone else also hold this view or understand it at least, or do you feel the need to argue that both can in no way coexist?.
@crabby you disagree therefore you are stupid.
thinking back to how they went from votes by the congregation under russels time to private closed doors in rutherfords time so as to not waste time, etc, of other members.
if it really wasn't to hide things from the org, it would have an option for the person it's against to have it open to the public.
a time announced for any members or the person to bring any they want to attend.
@Sevan perfect statement my friend.
Bottom line in the 1st Century it is clear this sort of thing was held at the city gate in public so that the judges were prone to fairness.
The governing body is in no way following the scriptures as it comes to judging, like zero chance.
..btw how many ppl did Jesus disfellowship? If this was so critical why don't we have an example of him disfellowshipping someone??????