I skipped a few pages so apologies if someone has already said this but here is my humble view;
1. Any religion seeking privilage for confidentiality when sins are confessed where a CRIME by law has been committed is SOLELY looking after it's own reputation and law writers should not let themselves be lobbied to allow it.
2. Any religion that offers a service to it's worshipers whereby sins can be confessed to a CRIME by law, and all will be confidential and said sin will be washed clean by god by way of said confession is SOLELY looking after their own reputation.
3. Offering spiritual help to a criminal should always exist and does so even inside prison.
4. Offering spiritual help to a criminal is a seperate thing from reporting a crime. They are mutually exclusive.
5. Mandatory reporting where a SERIOUS CRIME has been committed should be law.
6. Confidential helplines exist for anybody, victim or offender, looking for advice, or confession and these calls should be handled by trained proffessionals to seek information on crime and report any clues to a perpatrator where serious crime has been committed.
7. A sincere criminal feels he should pay for his crime. Anything else is not sincere, it's a game where the criminal is fooling himself.
8. Any religious body calling themselves the truth should NOT seek to offer refuge physically to a criminal. It is NOT their function. It is ONLY their function to offer spiritual refuge - which can be done throughout the whole process of confession to the police and detention and is quite rightly, their right!
9. For a religion to hide behind laws of the land instead of pioneering clean process is telling. They have a hand, in a game.