Posts by liam

43

Is 1st Century advice on marriage still relevant in today’s modern world?

by liam in

republicans want to make a law that forbids ‘uncontested divorce”.

they based this on this scripture.. matthew 19. is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?”.

4 “haven’t you read,” jesus replied, “that at the beginning the creator ‘made them male and female,’and said, ‘for this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’ so they are no longer two, but one flesh.

liam

peacefulpete

Actually, Democrats do not have a set of beliefs, that's what being a Democrat (supporter of democracy) means, allowing a diversity of beliefs. This about the only belief all democrats share.

Actually No,

Democrats Do Have a set of beliefs, in their campaign, they discuss their beliefs in the debates with Republicans. And just so you know, Republicans are supporters of democracy also.

But what I think you are misunderstanding is that the United States is not a true Democracy. Only the Greeks had something “Close” to a true democracy, but not really.

We have a Representative Democracy. That means you elect someone to represent you and what you believe is good for you and your family.

It also means YOU don’t get to choose any decisions that might affect your family or even You for the worse. For example, if you live in the USA and the representatives you choose, decide to declare war, they can institute a law that says all men and women, from ages 18 to 70 years of age, have to go fight.

You as an individual in this kind of Democracy have no say whatsoever. Your representatives do.

But there’s more. Say you and your family and the majority of Americans enjoy “Certain Rights” and you want to continue to enjoy these rights that you and your family have enjoyed for years. The day finally arrives, and it time to vote for the representatives that will protect those rights that you and your family enjoy.

Lets say Tom is the representative that promises to protect your rights, and Karen promises to take away those rights you and the majority of American enjoy.

The election starts off and Tom wins the popular vote. YES, the people have spoken, the majority of Americans have voted for Tom and he wins, so you get to keep your “Rights,”, …….RIGHT--------WRONG!

Karen wins the “Electoral Collage, and what that means is Tom cannot represent you even though the majority of American voted for Tom.

Karen won the Electoral College and her first order in office is to take away your rights that you’ve enjoyed for years. And on top of that, she starts a war and drafts all you kids.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiPL-XHKnCk

Here is an interview from Bill Maher, a full blooded Democrat from the day he became a teenager. He hates Trump and has been in legal battles with him for a long time. Listen to what he now thinks of the Democrat Party/Woke.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sh-57IbGUnQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yysKhJ1U-vM

Here is a small sample of ONE of the Democrat beliefs of the one running for President and Her Vice President, and they are making it very clear what their beliefs are.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmdAXLDmDts

75

God won't lift a finger to help you.

by nicolaou in

sea breeze: @nicolau,i stated my case rather succiently, which you failed to address.

if you have a better solution to the problem of evil than what jesus offers, then why don't you present that in a new topic?.

pathetic diversion.

liam

Balaamsass2

but could call home...or transfer some cash...if he wanted.

Yea but at least he would call, maybe once in a long while but at least he would let you know he existed

And at least he would send some cash, ......that's something.

But God doesn't call, and he doesn't answer prayers when you really need some help.

So either God doesn't exist anymore, perhaps he died a long time ago and wasn't immortal.

Or he doesn't give a F*** about human or animal life.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYLml04B5iw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YnpQ1f8Qo8

43

Is 1st Century advice on marriage still relevant in today’s modern world?

by liam in

republicans want to make a law that forbids ‘uncontested divorce”.

they based this on this scripture.. matthew 19. is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?”.

4 “haven’t you read,” jesus replied, “that at the beginning the creator ‘made them male and female,’and said, ‘for this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’ so they are no longer two, but one flesh.

liam

Balaamsass2

It also allows for multiple wives....for non-servants. Ministerial servants should be husbands of one wife. 1 Timothy 3:12 in the Bible states, "Let each deacon be the husband of one wife,

Well I'll be! I think you are right!

If every Christian was required to have ONE wife, the writer would have plainly said,

"Let ALL Christians be the husband of One Wife".........But he didn't!

That's probably why in the Catholic Church, Priests are forbidden to marry. They interpreted the verse correctly.

Let's apply that today to the Watchtower;

Let All elders and Ministerial Servants be the husband of One Wife.

But All publishers can have as many wives as they wish, This is the Lord's Commandment

How many would want to reach out for elder and MS?

43

Is 1st Century advice on marriage still relevant in today’s modern world?

by liam in

republicans want to make a law that forbids ‘uncontested divorce”.

they based this on this scripture.. matthew 19. is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?”.

4 “haven’t you read,” jesus replied, “that at the beginning the creator ‘made them male and female,’and said, ‘for this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’ so they are no longer two, but one flesh.

liam

LauraLynn

Forcing people to obey moral laws they do not believe obtains a sort of conformity in society,

….. It's a legalistic attempt to conform a person's behavior.

And here in lies the problem with the Entire United States of America.

The Republicans have a set of beliefs based on their interpretation of the Bible and they believe they they should try to somehow force everyone in the USA to conform to their beliefs.

The Democrats have their set of beliefs, these days it’s going Woke and a zillion genders and the idea that Democratic party should rule the USA for infinity, and anything and everything should be done to make that happen.

And now we have another problem. The Open Border has allowed Millions, some say as many as 40 million have entered the border illegally, but the Democrats have said no more than 6 million.

The problem is, all these people that have entered the Country illegally and are given citizenship legally, will bring their Own Culture and Beliefs. And some of these people believe in extreme interpretations of Sharia Law which will be forced on any woman and man living in their State where they make their home. This will be a bad thing for women living in their territory. If you think Watchtower disfellowshipping was bad, wait till we start hearing of women being beheaded because they committed adultery in their heart.

Sooner or later the USA is going to fragment like Africa, with different sects, factions and political tribes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffPDgXqEcEI

75

God won't lift a finger to help you.

by nicolaou in

sea breeze: @nicolau,i stated my case rather succiently, which you failed to address.

if you have a better solution to the problem of evil than what jesus offers, then why don't you present that in a new topic?.

pathetic diversion.

liam

Job suffered severely

Wow, This brings back memories!

This was the story that got my parents to stop pushing me to get baptized. They couldn’t explain to me Why?

The story of Job shows unequivocally, not only how the person who wrote this story had some of the lowest moral principles, but the entire culture of the time couldn’t distinguish the absurdity of a Father allowing a relative, a friend, or a stranger, to inflict pain and death to his own children.

Imagine if something like that happened in today’s modern world. Imagine if someone approaches a Father, and that someone asks the father of a son, and grandfather of many children, that if he allows him to inflict punishment on his son, and grandchildren, he can prove that his son only loves him because of what they can get out of him.

Now imagine the Father says yes, and the stranger throws acid on the son, kills all his children, and strips him of his livelihood.

Once the neighbors find out, without a doubt they will call the police and arrest the stranger and the Father, and throw them both in prison or give them the death penalty, for allowing such atrocity to be inflicted by this stranger to win a bet.

How about this other scenario, A stranger or a relative, approaches a Father who is a powerful king with many children who rules a huge empire and tells him that he wants to prove that his children don’t love him. And he can prove it by killing some, and torturing others.

How long do you think it will take before the King executes this man? Probably minutes.

Last scenario. Someone approaches you and tells you that your children don’t love you, and I can prove it if you allow me to kill some of your children and torture others.

What would you do?

This story of Job shows how low the moral standards of people living back then were. They were literally sick in the mind. This is why it was no big deal hearing the story of Lot handing off his daughters to a crowd to be raped, or the man who handed out his concubine to a crowd of perverts to rape her to death and then butcher her into twelve pieces and send the pieces to the twelve tribes of Israel. This is in the last three chapters of Judges.

This is one of the main reasons why the women of Gen Z hate the bible. The way women were treated in the OT is absurd and plain evil. And as more Generations are born every year, more people are rejecting the bible as the inspired word of God and concluding that it’s just a collections of stories written by ignorant men who were just reflecting the mores of their time.

At the rate information is being spread throughout the earth via the internet, and more people have access to the bible, I’d say in 100 year the bible will become irrelevant world wide.

All a person has to do is read the Bible a few times, and it becomes obvious that its a creation of ignorant men of the past.

43

Is 1st Century advice on marriage still relevant in today’s modern world?

by liam in

republicans want to make a law that forbids ‘uncontested divorce”.

they based this on this scripture.. matthew 19. is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?”.

4 “haven’t you read,” jesus replied, “that at the beginning the creator ‘made them male and female,’and said, ‘for this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’ so they are no longer two, but one flesh.

liam

peacefulpete

Mark 10:11,12 has Jesus forbid divorce for anyone. When the redactor of Matt revised this passage, he added the interrupter phrase, "except for porneia"..... Luke (16:18) either saw and disagreed with the redactor of Matt or it was not yet in the copy of Matt he was using. He also has Jesus forbid divorce on any grounds.

That's interesting, I never caught that. It shows how "Time" can change someone's views.

This reminds me of the WT policy NO BLOOD. Then later on, Blood Fractions OK!

It wouldn't surprise me if in 20-30 years, the entire No Blood ideology is thrown out by New Members of the Governing Body. By that time the new GB will be of the Generation Z.

Which shows that regarding religion, and religious holy books, it has always been just a bunch men running the show. Guessing at what is a sin and what is not a sin.

43

Is 1st Century advice on marriage still relevant in today’s modern world?

by liam in

republicans want to make a law that forbids ‘uncontested divorce”.

they based this on this scripture.. matthew 19. is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?”.

4 “haven’t you read,” jesus replied, “that at the beginning the creator ‘made them male and female,’and said, ‘for this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’ so they are no longer two, but one flesh.

liam

keeping the government out of it is another one most would agree upon,

This is the best idea.

These days in the USA, some stats say women initiate 70% of all divorces

So if you were going skydiving and they told you 3 of 4 parachutes were not going to open, how many would stop right there and forget the whole rhetoric about how great skydiving is?

If you get married at 20, have a couple of kids by 24, and then your wife decides she wants a divorce, you will be stuck with child support for the next 20 years, plus alimony. Plus you don’t get to see your own kids every day, but a judge whom you never met will decide how many times and when you will be able to see your kids.

Now you want to get married again and finally find the love of your life and she has two kids and after a few years you finally realize the story about the Prince finding the Princess and riding off into the sunset was just a story made up by some romantic that wanted to sell books.

Most of my friends have gotten married and had children by age 24. And most of those are already on their second marriage and come and complain to me about their lot in life. And the biggest struggle they have right now is Money.

Even the older ones I know who have been married some 50 years tell me it wasn’t easy and perhaps they should of waited till they were in their late 40s, or 50s.

The problem is this world doesn’t make it easy for two people in love to stay in love. And the marriage and divorce laws are out of wack.And the worse thing about it all is that life is short. 80 years if your lucky, and the last few will be in declining health. And at 80, sex will just be a bodily function like waking up and walking around. It won't be the hot, steamy romantic sex that you had when you first met your wife or husband, and both of you had hot 18 years old bodies.

Now it's 80-90 year old bodies. It's won't be an easy thing watching the person you love and shared your life with get old and sickly and there's nothing you can do about it but hold her hand. I know this because I see my parents frustration as they get old and more sickly than when they were younger. Both my father and mother are terrified of losing each other. They are hoping hard the paradise will come before either one of them dies.

The only reason I can see this is because I was lucky enough to inherit something that allowed me to not worry about taking care of myself and it allowed me time to study and meditate on life and what it offers. It seems like trying to enjoy the wonders of life and avoid as much Drama and people that cause Drama is the Key to a happy life.

Had I not inherit what I did, I would be doing the same thing my friends did and probably be divorce by now with kids.

Did you know most Gen Z are not getting married and don’t want children?

The scene of the world is changing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sP6oQTQVzso

36

Why Is Watchtower (Supposedly a Family Friendly Christian Publisher) Obsessed with Oral Sex?

by Sea Breeze in

if you do a search on the wt website and type in "oral sex", you will get 69 results.

https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/s/r1/lp-e?q=oral+sex&p=par&r=occ&st=a .

why does the wt.

liam

Sea Breeze - “If you do a search on the WT website and type in ‘oral sex’, you will get 69 results.”

Vidiot

69?

Seriously?

69? ........7 Times........144,00. Every number the WT prints has a "Last Days" application

https://www.women.com/1336564/why-69-ing-overrated-sex-position/

75

God won't lift a finger to help you.

by nicolaou in

sea breeze: @nicolau,i stated my case rather succiently, which you failed to address.

if you have a better solution to the problem of evil than what jesus offers, then why don't you present that in a new topic?.

pathetic diversion.

liam

TonusOH

However... until we get to one of those difficult issues, we seem to have no problem at all comprehending god. We have a clear basis for judging his character and actions as long as they fit into an acceptable moral framework. When his actions fall into a gray area, we decide that he is inscrutable. That we cannot fathom his ways. That he exists on a higher moral and ethical plane, and thus our judgments do not apply.

Ah yes, the doubling down to protect the narrative, and to protect ourselves from the psychic pain of discovering that what we thought was correct………….Might not be correct after all!

Instead of confronting our failings, our wrong assumptions head-on, we instead practice different forms of evasion, try hard to rationalize the contradictions, and start the process of realigning the new facts with what we believe can fit our preconceive assumptions.

“Example; Jehovah possesses perfect, unlimited, and eternal goodwill, kindness, and love towards all creation. As the source of goodness and love itself, Jehovah cannot act in any way contrary to His fundamentally benevolent nature.”

But wait, Why does the bible say that Jehovah Killed 70,000 of his loyal, faithful, innocent worshipers just because a King took a census and pissed him off. And why did he force King David to choose one of the three ways he would wipe out thousands of innocent mothers, fathers, children, and infants? Isn’t that exactly what drug Cartels do to intimidate people into submission?

As Humans we have this tendency to claim confidence in what we believe. We may believe;

We will get a promotion at work.

The person that we are dating now is the one.

Our candidate will definitely win the election this November because everyone that is rational will be voting for him.

When none of these things come true, we start the process of using different forms of evasion, rationalization, and realignment, all in an attempt to make it all make sense. We do the same thing with our idea of God.

God allows evil because of free will.

God has allowed suffering because an issue of Universal Sovereignty was brought up in Eden.

We inherited Sin so God needed a Ransom Sacrifice before he acts.

God’s time table is not the same as ours.

And the list goes on.

It’s hard for humans to see reality as it is, (harsh, uncaring, Random) and accept it as truth.

So we create narratives to ease the Psychic Pain, the cognitive dissonance.

For some humans, to accept reality might mean, entering the Highway of Nihilism, a life with no meaning. A realization that in the end, we go back to what we were before we were born.

And once you’ve experience the sweet taste of Life, the love, the wonders, Nothingness just won’t cut it anymore.

So we do what humans do best……….we create stories of what God wants, what he hates, what kind of sex is wrong, what kind of food is bad to eat, what medical procedure is a sin, what kind of worship does he approve, what kind of worship is False.......and the list goes on.

And if you do what your Church, preacher, Governing Body, or your own assumptions tell you what God wants, then you will inherit Everlasting Life. And your mind will not be in constant Psychic Shock. You can simmer down the hot flames of cognitive dissonance and live in relative peace of mind, until you are no more.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFRBByUoJbA

75

God won't lift a finger to help you.

by nicolaou in

sea breeze: @nicolau,i stated my case rather succiently, which you failed to address.

if you have a better solution to the problem of evil than what jesus offers, then why don't you present that in a new topic?.

pathetic diversion.

liam

Halcon; But even in this wonderful film there was the stated possibility that the engineers had their own Creator.

Ah-Yes, the age old question, “If God created Everything-----Who created God?”

Ridley made sure he made this possibility of a Creator not being immortal, evident in Prometheus. He wanted to make sure the audience grasped the idea that a Creation might outshine and outlive the Creator

Quote; Between the Creator Weyland and the Creation David the android.

“You seek your Creator, I am looking at mine.”

“I will serve you, Yet you are Human”

“You will Die, I will Not”

The Creator feels the pain that he, though being a Creator, will die. But his Creation will live long after he, the Creator has died

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxyAl_Rn2Pc