https://www.ebay.com/itm/203474749415.
im a watchtower/bible students history nerd.
i find the movement that engulfed my entire family fascinating.
Joseph Malik actually participated here and on Channel C way back when. (He passed away about eleven years ago)
He was an interesting person. Like you have guessed, he believed his studies had given him a superior insight into the Bible, but he was also a very clear thinker in other respects.
His untangling of the convoluted Passover timeline of JW's which results in them celebrating Memorial on the evening of the 13th/14th instead of the evening of the 14th/15th is pretty accurate IMHO
i just watched that stupid talk by gary while e bro on not using a gun for self defense but it went deeper.
i was that you don't defend yourself against violence.
well ain't that great from an asshat living in a gated and guarded compound.
Even without the factoid above the number of assumptions you have to make for the plausibility of the explanation strains this readers credulity. (At least....)
You have to assume that Jesus either didn't know that at least a couple of his disciples had swords. or had been perfectly okay with it up to that point.
You have to ignore the clear meaning of the metaphor, καὶ...πωλησάτω τὸ ἱμάτιον αὐτοῦ, and assume that Jesus seriously expected his disciples to go out in Jerusalem on Passover and conduct this transaction if need be
And you have to interpret the references to a purse and food pouch under an entirely different rubric even though all three items are listed in the same context.
i just watched that stupid talk by gary while e bro on not using a gun for self defense but it went deeper.
i was that you don't defend yourself against violence.
well ain't that great from an asshat living in a gated and guarded compound.
Interesting. Thanks Earnest.
The Watchtower endorsed the idea expressed by Yoder, Penner and other Christian pacifists that Peter's possession of a sword served as a fulfillment of Isaiah 53:12 in the 1983 article, Walking With God In a Violent World
However they explicitly walked that idea back in (at least) three private letters that I have firsthand knowledge of and said that the "brief statement" on page 19 should not be viewed as an adjustment to the existing idea that it was the manner of Jesus' execution and to a lesser degree, his trial and arrest that actually fulfilled the prophecy.
I was curious about your inclusion of the reference in the quoted passage above, so I went and looked in the 2013 edition of the NWT and sure enough, it is there now. That is a departure from their 1984 reference Bible, which did away with that reference.
i just watched that stupid talk by gary while e bro on not using a gun for self defense but it went deeper.
i was that you don't defend yourself against violence.
well ain't that great from an asshat living in a gated and guarded compound.
The book, Judging Jehovah's Witnesses: Religious Persecution and the Dawn of the Rights Revolution sheds a little light on how the current anti-gun stance was born.
Up until the time of mob violence against Jehovah's Witnesses (1939 - 1945) self defense had been perfectly acceptable and this was explicitly stated in Rutherford's 1937 book Enemies.
When mobs appeared, Jehovah's Witnesses took to the roofs of Kingdom Halls with hunting rifles. Sometimes small town police were part and parcel of this violence.
In the long run, this did the organization more harm than good. Martyrs (i.e. People who are beaten senseless, forced to drink castor oil, tarred and feathered, castrated, etc.) arouse sympathy for a religious cause. People who shoot at police do not.
So the current anti-gun stance is entirely about the welfare of the organization. You as an individual don't even enter into the equation.
i just watched that stupid talk by gary while e bro on not using a gun for self defense but it went deeper.
i was that you don't defend yourself against violence.
well ain't that great from an asshat living in a gated and guarded compound.
What is the JW explanation of Luke 22:36 these days?
They always loved to selectively quote Jesus on this issue but never had a plausible explanation for that verse
in my lifetime 9/11 was the worst thing that i can recall.
the effect it had was incredibly horrible!
almost everyone seemed to know someone that was either directly or indirectly affected by this diabolical act.
The two aren't even remotely comparable.
Having said that though, there doesn't seem to much awareness of how lucky those people are to be living today and not in a previous century.
im not here to start a debate.. ive heard the above expression countless time over the past year and a half and genuinely want to know what it means.. if you feel this way, do you mean :.
a. there is no covid19 virus?.
b. covid19 is real but not a threat of any kind?.
MMM
Statements like "it's not real" or "it's the flu" are often imprecise ways of conveying a thought...
I think that is a good way to express the difference between practical and technical definitions.
In a similar vein, the claim that the Spanish Influenza of 1919 was "worse," is definitely true in a practical sense (In terms of the total number of deaths) but it is not true in a technical sense. Modern medicine did not exist in 1918/1919 and if you want to make an accurate comparison, than you have to look at Covid 19 cases is areas where medical treatment was nonexistent.
The Spanish Influenza in its most virulent form had a mortality rate of just over 4%, which is roughly comparable to Covid 19 when it is left untreated.
(My sources for the influenza mortality rate are: Flu: The Story of the Great Influenza Pandemic of 1918 and the Search For the Virus that Caused It by Gina Kolata and America's Forgotten Pandemic: The Influenza of 1918 by Alfred W Crosby -- I don't know where people are getting their information from lately)
interesting find through a book "inside story of jehovah's witnesses" (1967) by w.c. stevenson, supposedly a former jw circuit overseer.
it's an interesting "apostate" perspective written prior to the wts 1975 debacle.. anyway, at a certain point, there's a quote from a book called "the four cults", by professor anthony a. hoekema (1963, william b. eerdmans publishing company), a calvinist, which makes some sharp remarks about the way jehovah's witnesses teach the dead coming back to life:.
1) in the case of those "resurrecting" for everlasting life on earth, one asks: if the soul is extinct at death, and the body disintegrates and its components are integrated into other forms of life, what is there to "resurrect"?
The idea of an identical body and the implantation of your memories and personality into it is very much like the movie, The 6th Day where the human copy (Clone with implanted memories) truly, honestly, believes he's the original and is devastated to find out he's not.
That the JW teaching is much closer to modern science fiction than anything you can actually find in the Bible should tell you something...
when i was younger we had song books and i recall that some of the songs were pretty catchy.
then they revised it took some of those songs out, and added more.
i have to admit some songs were pretty good.
There aren't many opportunities to use the word, "doggerel" anymore, but describing the songs song at the KH is one of them...
i’m sick and tired of seeing pictures and articles about their rekindled romance.
who cares???
do you enjoy seeing news articles about celebrity daters?.
Only in the sense that I care about all people and would rather see them happy than miserable.
I do have to say that I had more respect for Ben Affleck after seeing Argo and more respect for Jennifer Lopez after seeing Shall We Dance, but movies don't really tell you much about the individual.
