It is up to us to decide which interpretation makes more sense.
Yes.
it's really tough to find a decent discussion on the merits of the NWT.
On one hand, legitimate criticisms, (Like the horrible rendering of John 17:3 which took many years to fix.) are dismissed out of hand by JW's because "God's channel" can't possibly be wrong on a matter as serious as translation.
But on the other hand, the NWT is criticized in areas where robust discussion and a plurality of thought exists.
this has been a bug bear my whole life i think and not really sure how to address it as nobody else ever seems to do so.. and it relates to the question if god really created humans .
he did a shithouse job in this regard.. i can`t speak for females this is entirely a male thing.
from my perspective.. male adolescents at a very ,very young age , babies , get erections periodically and it has nothing to do with sexual fantasies ,because they don`t even have an awareness of sex between a male and a female at this time.. and it is second inbuilt nature to masturbate to relieve, get rid of the erection .
Why? If only for procreation?
Because human sexual response in both genders is a mixture of voluntary action and autonomic function
The autonomic side of the equation pretty much parallels the development of the nervous system
I suppose we could ask why God (If he exists) chose to automate this one function instead of giving males conscious control over it.
Perhaps because one less thing to think about frees up your mind for some of the more important aspects?
david gelernter, a famed yale university professor, has publicly renounced his belief in charles darwin’s theory of evolution, calling it a “beautiful idea” that has been effectively disproven.. article.
Another (And IMO more correct than the OP's) perspective:
https://quillette.com/2019/09/09/david-gelernter-is-wrong-about-ditching-darwin/
admit it, we all have things that we reel off when people ask what our favourite music is, just the same as if people ask what our favourite movies are.
we're meant to say "citizen kane" and "casablanca" and not "battleship" or "pacific rim" but we know what we're going to watch if they are ever on tv at the same time (and which ones we've never actually seen).. so how about some confession time?
what do you listen to when no one else is in the house?.
Ever since someone here mentioned this as a mesmerizeing video 6 months ago, I cant get it out of my head. Maybe its just the pretty girls too...
Schlager....
--And I'm relieved that I'm not the only one
Here's one more for the ladies:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qaZ0oAh4evU
i have never been there!
where should i visit in washington dc while i am there?
thank you in advance for your recommendations!
--Lived there for 13 years
Like some of the others have said, you'll have to prioritize based on your interests, as you could easily spend a week in the Smithsonian complex alone
Other things to see in and around D.C.:
The Bureau of Printing and Engraving
The National Museum of the U.S. Navy
The College Park Aviation Museum
The National Geographic Headquarters
The National Gallery of Art
Mount Vernon (South of DC proper, but not too terrible of a drive)
The Goddard Space Flight Center (Northeast of DC proper, but again, not a horrible drive)
i hear some people say that if you are a republican or democrat that you must not be very educated, intelligent or monetarily stable.
.
do you think it’s proper to paint any person as less than favorable because of their political opinions?
I don't understand and am sometimes disturbed by the personality cult that has formed around the man, (e.g. Jon McNaughton's crazy paintings) but good grief! You have the right to your opinion. Everybody does.
i hear some people say that if you are a republican or democrat that you must not be very educated, intelligent or monetarily stable.
.
do you think it’s proper to paint any person as less than favorable because of their political opinions?
Do you think it’s proper to paint any person as less than favorable because of their political opinions??
How about members of The American Nazi Party? (Later known as The New Order)
Should we be broad-minded and impartial?
i came across this article written in 2004 by an evangelical.. “when did jerusalem fall?”, rodger young, journal of the evangelical society [jets], 47/1 (march 2004), 21-38.. http://www.rcyoung.org/articles/jerusalem.pdf .
these are the conclusions of the 18-page analysis.
(1) jerusalem fell in the fourth month (tammuz) of 587 bc.
I'm perplexed.
"Celebrated JW scholars" have demonstrated repeatedly that they don't understand what an equinox is.
Why should I throw away my history books based on what one of their more educated supporters (i.e. Neil) admits is exegesis?
What does this have to do with ancient people, their history and their calendaring methods?
admit it, we all have things that we reel off when people ask what our favourite music is, just the same as if people ask what our favourite movies are.
we're meant to say "citizen kane" and "casablanca" and not "battleship" or "pacific rim" but we know what we're going to watch if they are ever on tv at the same time (and which ones we've never actually seen).. so how about some confession time?
what do you listen to when no one else is in the house?.
Schlager...
Schlager is a genre of music half-way between modern rock and traditional folk music.
--Simple melodies deliberately designed to get stuck in your head. It's typically (although not always) sung by an attractive woman and often sickly sweet. (Enough to make your teeth fall out.)
English speakers might be familiar with ABBA, Aqua and A-Ha, which are all technically schlager, although not the purest examples of it.
It's not that I don't like other, more serious forms of music. I do.
Schlager cheers me up when I'm in a bad mood though. --A little bit like comedy that's so stupid you find yourself laughing anyway.
Here's a good example: (Not that I've ever listened to it - LOL)
is it true that in 1975 the watchtower falsely predicted the end of the world and a great number of the membership quit and just a few years later they turned disassociation into disfellowshipping?
.
No need to leave, who cares about that one down voter? It's probably just a JW who is waking up and lurking, but still in that angry stage of denial.
Yes.
Like hissy feral kittens. Terrified and fascinated at the same time.
