The two aren't even remotely comparable.
Having said that though, there doesn't seem to much awareness of how lucky those people are to be living today and not in a previous century.
in my lifetime 9/11 was the worst thing that i can recall.
the effect it had was incredibly horrible!
almost everyone seemed to know someone that was either directly or indirectly affected by this diabolical act.
The two aren't even remotely comparable.
Having said that though, there doesn't seem to much awareness of how lucky those people are to be living today and not in a previous century.
im not here to start a debate.. ive heard the above expression countless time over the past year and a half and genuinely want to know what it means.. if you feel this way, do you mean :.
a. there is no covid19 virus?.
b. covid19 is real but not a threat of any kind?.
MMM
Statements like "it's not real" or "it's the flu" are often imprecise ways of conveying a thought...
I think that is a good way to express the difference between practical and technical definitions.
In a similar vein, the claim that the Spanish Influenza of 1919 was "worse," is definitely true in a practical sense (In terms of the total number of deaths) but it is not true in a technical sense. Modern medicine did not exist in 1918/1919 and if you want to make an accurate comparison, than you have to look at Covid 19 cases is areas where medical treatment was nonexistent.
The Spanish Influenza in its most virulent form had a mortality rate of just over 4%, which is roughly comparable to Covid 19 when it is left untreated.
(My sources for the influenza mortality rate are: Flu: The Story of the Great Influenza Pandemic of 1918 and the Search For the Virus that Caused It by Gina Kolata and America's Forgotten Pandemic: The Influenza of 1918 by Alfred W Crosby -- I don't know where people are getting their information from lately)
interesting find through a book "inside story of jehovah's witnesses" (1967) by w.c. stevenson, supposedly a former jw circuit overseer.
it's an interesting "apostate" perspective written prior to the wts 1975 debacle.. anyway, at a certain point, there's a quote from a book called "the four cults", by professor anthony a. hoekema (1963, william b. eerdmans publishing company), a calvinist, which makes some sharp remarks about the way jehovah's witnesses teach the dead coming back to life:.
1) in the case of those "resurrecting" for everlasting life on earth, one asks: if the soul is extinct at death, and the body disintegrates and its components are integrated into other forms of life, what is there to "resurrect"?
The idea of an identical body and the implantation of your memories and personality into it is very much like the movie, The 6th Day where the human copy (Clone with implanted memories) truly, honestly, believes he's the original and is devastated to find out he's not.
That the JW teaching is much closer to modern science fiction than anything you can actually find in the Bible should tell you something...
when i was younger we had song books and i recall that some of the songs were pretty catchy.
then they revised it took some of those songs out, and added more.
i have to admit some songs were pretty good.
There aren't many opportunities to use the word, "doggerel" anymore, but describing the songs song at the KH is one of them...
i’m sick and tired of seeing pictures and articles about their rekindled romance.
who cares???
do you enjoy seeing news articles about celebrity daters?.
Only in the sense that I care about all people and would rather see them happy than miserable.
I do have to say that I had more respect for Ben Affleck after seeing Argo and more respect for Jennifer Lopez after seeing Shall We Dance, but movies don't really tell you much about the individual.
i found this interesting perspective on reddit.. post;.
i remember the moment the first real crack in my faith happened as a jehovah's witness.
i was sitting in the kingdom hall during the watchtower study where, as is common, the article was talking about how the israelites as a nation abandoned jehovah.. "but wait," i thought, "having a nation represent him here on earth was part of his plan.
Most doubts aren't created by apostates. They are created in a Kingdom Hall.
Absolutely
do you think most of what they cover is accurate?
do you trust the media , especially mainstream?.
Were they ever unbiased? I remember Walter Cronkite throwing objectivity to the wind in his coverage of the Vietnam War and that was awhile ago
many that have come to this forum have left the jws religion and moved on with their lives but from a outsider's viewpoint what do think makes the jws religion wrong or incorrect as a active christian faith ?.
somethings come to mind such as its long continuous end times/armageddon soon doctrine which has really been a core doctrine for decades going right back to its beginning .. maybe they should have adopted the stance as other christian based faiths and adhered to jesus's own words when he said " no one knows of the time not even he ".
.
SBF
In the US...1 in 273 of the US population is an active publisher.
The nature of the question would preclude JW's themselves. Sorry for not being clear about what I meant by people on the street. I should know better than to use idioms like that.
as a youg man this stunned me when i studied the original "youth" book 97% had done it so i thought soo that's pretty much everyone i guess the 3% were witness youth!
also "awake" claimed 90% of students had accessed porn at some time.
everyone is doing it i guess 10% are the witness youth...how dumb was i?.
Like a lot of fundamentalist groups, Jehovah's Witnesses disregard the legal, linguistic and literary definitions of pornography and define it along purely subjective lines, which would include any portrayal of the human form that is pleasant to the eye at all.
By that definition, pretty much everyone has accessed "porn" because even the swimsuit edition of Sports Illustrated would probably qualify.
The German magazine, Stern, from which the JW's plagiairzed the picture of Pacale Petit for the Live Forever book, would definitely be considered "Porn" by JW's, which makes you wonder what they were doing with it in the first place.
i saw the rise of skywalker (2019) a few weeks ago.. and it is totally crazy, lol, it has everything but the kitchen sink.. i can somewhat feel for writer/director jj abrams because rian johnson went f**k up in the previous film.. e.g.
in the force awakens (2015), abrams introduced snoke, but then in the last jedi (2017) johnson killed him off, the same thing happened to luke.. but that doesn't really hide hollywood hack abrams from criticism of this movie.
bringing back emperor palpatine - i mean, really?.
I haven't seen it (The Rise of Skywalker) yet, but I'm sure it's a train wreck. I'll give it a try though.
To be fair, continuity and plausibility problems have plagued the
franchise from the moment Vader knelt on the dais and addressed the
Emperor as "My master." (And that was in 1980....)