Wow, openminded I guess that line of reasoning didnt work after all. The person you correspond with is ready to defend the WTS no matter what you may say.
The tone of the person's words is quite interesting. Hostillity is oozing from the response. You have really struck a nerve there.
This part is good: "following blindly in their path. Where is objectivity? Where is truth? Where is the love, joy, peace, kindness, goodness, mildness, long suffering, faith and self control?" The tables are being turned on you. Farkel would probably know the name for this ploy.
The reference to Paul to is irrelevent and helps to evade the conclusion that you suggested in your reasoning. And I really like the cop=out word :"interfacing". Very nice.