in response to the 37 threads in my evolution is a fact series - see bottom of op for links - perry posted a link to an article "44 reasons why evolution isn't true".. i offered him a challenge on the thread and by pm.
predictably he is totally ignoring it, so i am offering the challenge to any evolution-denier who thinks they have evidence to support their position.. please present one specific piece of evidence for creationism.. my task will be to refute it with evidence within 24 hours.. then i will present one piece of evidence for evolution and your challenge will be the same.. all posts must be as succinct as reasonably possible.
entirely in your own words, without copy-paste, videos or links.. please post your interest to take part and we will set it up before the first actual post in the exchange.
I have a hard time comprehending why someone would spend this much time on a public forum debating and trying to change other's minds. Didn't we stop that when we left the JWs? I mean, anyone can watch YouTube videos, research papers, or take an Anthropology course at the local Community College.
But hey, to each his own.
in response to the 37 threads in my evolution is a fact series - see bottom of op for links - perry posted a link to an article "44 reasons why evolution isn't true".. i offered him a challenge on the thread and by pm.
predictably he is totally ignoring it, so i am offering the challenge to any evolution-denier who thinks they have evidence to support their position.. please present one specific piece of evidence for creationism.. my task will be to refute it with evidence within 24 hours.. then i will present one piece of evidence for evolution and your challenge will be the same.. all posts must be as succinct as reasonably possible.
entirely in your own words, without copy-paste, videos or links.. please post your interest to take part and we will set it up before the first actual post in the exchange.
Oh dear. I don't understand why this isn't on a creationist/evolution forum.
http://www.meetup.com/austin-ex-jehovahs-witnesses-meetup/events/231160574/.
.
star trek "frame of mind" episode:.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sy90d2ipd6y/p>.
the lady at 3:13 remind me of people like e-watchman.
Star Trek "Frame of Mind" episode:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sY90d2iPd6Y/p>
The lady at 3:13 remind me of people like e-watchman. The people that are awake but are a bit nuts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i405e0vge0k.
thanks for all the support!.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i405E0vge0k
Thanks for all the support!
how was your wedding?
did you have a jw wedding or something different?
my wedding was not what either of us wanted at first, but it turned out very lovely.
congrats, Stan! Beautiful couple! Wish you all the best!
I always thought the weirdest JW weddings were the ones thrown by the rich Elder, for his daughter. They always had a creepy vibe. I really don't know why. Maybe because of the wedding talk?!
http://www.meetup.com/austin-ex-jehovahs-witnesses-meetup/
it was a fictional (obviously) story about what life would be like after armageddon if the jws were right.
the kingdom of god is already begun, which is pointed out in prophecy as due to begin the exercise of power in a.d. 1878, and that the "battle of the great day of god almighty" which will end in 1914 with the complete overthrow of the earth's present rulership, is already commenced.. i just did the math....and russell was right.
christ returned invisibly in 1874 and took rulership (restored kingdom reign) in 1878.. 2520 years minus 607 when jerusalem was destroyed = 1913 (accounting for no year zero) = 1914. that`s 2520 - 607 = 2014. but wait, that`s 2520 prophetic years of 360 days, not solar days of 365.25 days.
to convert to solar days then one must multuiply 2520 x 365.25 which gives us 2,484 actual years.
Oh my goodness.
This is JW 2.0 all the way.
Looks just like a Mormon video.
Glad I left in time
