"molecules don't care about life.
" first part deals with abiogenesis and the state of current research.
second part stephen meyer proposes intelligent design as an explanation of some of the problems.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bss0rxpsbuq.
Biological evolution = myth
Why would I read a book of myths to find out anything scientific?
"Why should anybody take you seriously when you have not read a single word of the evidence that you arrogantly dismiss?"
Why should anybody take you seriously when you don't even know what an anthropologist studies? (You can google it if you don't know.)
"molecules don't care about life.
" first part deals with abiogenesis and the state of current research.
second part stephen meyer proposes intelligent design as an explanation of some of the problems.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bss0rxpsbuq.
"Do you or are you only interested in silly point-scoring?"
(I don't know what you are talking about with silly point scoring, but I will take the opportunity to say that I am not the person who puts all the down votes on things that are posted before or after what I post. I don't generally like it when people put down votes. I think the only down votes I have ever put on something was when a person posted an extremely debased photo, or when I saw someone picking on a different person here, or that time when somebody said that Randy should go to meetings if he was lonely. I notice that sometimes when I post, someone else will come and put a down vote on the person who posted prior to me, but that is not me doing it.)
"What books that present the scientific case for biological evolution have you read?"
There are no books that present a scientific case for biological evolution. It's not possible to read one, because they don't exist.
re-posting this for reference.. #1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
Cofty, the evolutionary theorists can't even see Jehovah, and He's standing right in front of them.
If they can't see the obvious, why would I trust anything they have to say? They're a bunch of liars. Listening to them is listening to the annual meeting. They mix truth with false and make stuff up as they go.
I know Jehovah exists. I don't wonder. I don't doubt. I know.
It's hilarious to me, the papers and books and stories these evolutionary "scientists" publish, because I know they're full of crap. I don't wonder if they're full of crap. I know they're full of crap.
You can cut and paste their articles and websites to all the forums threads you want, but you can't make Jehovah disappear. He's not going anywhere. But you can't even see Him.
I hear you saying blah blah blah about Him not existing, but you refuse to look up. It's like listening to a little kid covering his eyes and ears and pretending that other person isn't in the room.
You can carry on with it if you want, but you're just going to have to eat your words when you finally decide to open your eyes - or when they are opened for you.
Jehovah Caused to Become. And He is Still Causing. Evolution is crap.💩😝
perhaps you say the story buried deep in todays paper describing the observed mandibular tooth growth in a strain of mutant chickens.
for decades scientists have been able to coax chicken embryos into forming teeth by overlaying epidemal tissue from repiltes or mice onto the forming jaws of a chicken embryo.
the grafted tissue was not the source of the teeth but was by some unknown mechanism triggering the chickens dormant recessive tooth genes to awake.
You can always tell the "scientists" who grew up watching the Flintstones...
😆
perhaps you say the story buried deep in todays paper describing the observed mandibular tooth growth in a strain of mutant chickens.
for decades scientists have been able to coax chicken embryos into forming teeth by overlaying epidemal tissue from repiltes or mice onto the forming jaws of a chicken embryo.
the grafted tissue was not the source of the teeth but was by some unknown mechanism triggering the chickens dormant recessive tooth genes to awake.
😏😆😉
"molecules don't care about life.
" first part deals with abiogenesis and the state of current research.
second part stephen meyer proposes intelligent design as an explanation of some of the problems.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bss0rxpsbuq.
"What do we 'purport' exactly?"
If you don't know, then you need to go reread your evolution books and then come back.
😁
re-posting this for reference.. #1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
"Truth is decided by cold hard evidence not feelings."
"FFS"
😂
Sounds like you've got some strong feelings for evolution there, Cofty.
Maybe you should stick with the cold hard facts.😁
"And our genome testifies to our close ancestry to other primates.
Exactly the same sort of genetic evidence that is used to prove paternity shows beside all doubt that we share a common ancestry with all other living things."
Your feelings are blinding you to the truth, Cofty.
Our genome shows that our creator used similar types of code in different organisms He created, but that we all have only one human ancestor and not a bunch of different mutating so-called hominids. Our genome shows the truth of the Bible account in Genesis.
"molecules don't care about life.
" first part deals with abiogenesis and the state of current research.
second part stephen meyer proposes intelligent design as an explanation of some of the problems.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bss0rxpsbuq.
If truth doesn't involve feelings, then why do you get angry about discussing it? (I'm not saying it's wrong to be passionate - I am just making the observation.)
Evolution doesn't explain the heart. The "evidence" doesn't fit.
The conscience is not designed for "advancement of the species" like some kind of sexual competition for passing on genes the way evolutionary theorists purport.
"molecules don't care about life.
" first part deals with abiogenesis and the state of current research.
second part stephen meyer proposes intelligent design as an explanation of some of the problems.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bss0rxpsbuq.
I fell in love with truth.😍
re-posting this for reference.. #1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
I am evidence that Jehovah exists. I am here because He sent me by means of His holy spirit. I am telling you openly that I am a witness of Jehovah, because of Jehovah's love and mercy, because He exists and He has witnesses. I am not here because I like forums. I am a witness of Jehovah's existence.
Show me a witness of evolution, even one person who can say that evolution sent them. There isn't one. Why not? No person evolved. No one was there to see it because it didn't happen. The reason the scientists have to keep changing their stories is because their stories have so many holes in them, they have to "evolve" the stories. The story of evolution is a story of fiction.
There were witnesses to the creation of man. Jesus saw it. He was part of it. He was there and helped with their creation. He came and talked about it. If you don't believe his witness, then you will soon, because he's coming back again, and you can tell him to his face that you don't believe in him if you want, but I think he'll laugh at you.
He has sent many witnesses over the years and been with them when they told the truth about God, but people laughed and didn't want to believe. That's fine. It doesn't change the truth about God and the truth about creation.
I did not evolve. I am here genetically descended from Adam, who was created by God. You can do a genome test if you want. We all have a common ancestor because we were created.
