"For he must rule as king until God has put all enemies under his feet. And the last enemy, death, is to be brought to nothing. For God “subjected all things under his feet.” But when he says that ‘all things have been subjected,’ it is evident that this does not include the One who subjected all things to him. But when all things will have been subjected to him, then the Son himself will also subject himself to the One who subjected all things to him, that God may be all things to everyone." (1 Corinthians 15:25-28)
EasyPrompt
JoinedPosts by EasyPrompt
-
72
Romans 9:5
by aqwsed12345 inna28: ὧν οἱ πατέρες καὶ ἐξ ὧν ὁ χριστὸς τὸ κατὰ σάρκα, ὁ ὢν ἐπὶ πάντων θεὸς εὐλογητὸς εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας, ἀμήν.. na28 transliterated: hō̃n hoi patéres kaì ex hō̃n ho khristòs tò katà sárka, ho ṑn epì pántōn theòs eulogētòs eis toùs aiō̃nas, amḗn.. kit: .
nwt: to them the forefathers belong, and from them the christ descended according to the flesh.
god, who is over all, be praised forever.
-
-
72
Romans 9:5
by aqwsed12345 inna28: ὧν οἱ πατέρες καὶ ἐξ ὧν ὁ χριστὸς τὸ κατὰ σάρκα, ὁ ὢν ἐπὶ πάντων θεὸς εὐλογητὸς εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας, ἀμήν.. na28 transliterated: hō̃n hoi patéres kaì ex hō̃n ho khristòs tò katà sárka, ho ṑn epì pántōn theòs eulogētòs eis toùs aiō̃nas, amḗn.. kit: .
nwt: to them the forefathers belong, and from them the christ descended according to the flesh.
god, who is over all, be praised forever.
-
EasyPrompt
@SeaBreeze, 🥰I didn't doubt it one bit. That's why I said "I'm sure you must believe!"🫶
Regarding bearing witness to Jesus, one way we bear such witness to him is to imitate Jesus' life course. Here is what the scriptures say about how he finished his human life on earth...
"After this, when Jesus knew that by now all things had been accomplished, in order to fulfill the scripture he said: “I am thirsty.” A jar was sitting there full of sour wine. So they put a sponge full of the sour wine on a hyssop stalk and held it up to his mouth. When he had received the sour wine, Jesus said: “It has been accomplished!” and bowing his head, he gave up his spirit."
When Jesus said "It has been accomplished!" he wasn't just talking about fulfilling the scripture about the sour wine. What else was he referring to?
The answer is recorded for us at John chapter 17...
"Jesus said: "I have glorified you on the earth, having finished the work you have given me to do...I have made your name manifest..."
Jesus fully accomplished being a faithful witness of Jehovah even to the death. When we are faithful witnesses of Jesus we will also be faithful witnesses of Jehovah, like Jesus said further on in John chapter 17...
“I make request, not concerning these only, but also concerning those putting faith in me through their word, so that they may all be one, just as you, Father, are in union with me and I am in union with you, that they also may be in union with us, so that the world may believe that you sent me. I have given them the glory that you have given me, in order that they may be one just as we are one. I in union with them and you in union with me, in order that they may be perfected into one, so that the world may know that you sent me and that you loved them just as you loved me. Father, I want those whom you have given me to be with me where I am, in order that they may look upon my glory that you have given me, because you loved me before the founding of the world. Righteous Father, the world has, indeed, not come to know you, but I know you, and these have come to know that you sent me. I have made your name known to them and will make it known, so that the love with which you loved me may be in them and I in union with them.”
It is not our "label" that identifies us as "Jesus' witnesses" or "Jehovah's witnesses" - it is our Love that identifies us as witnesses of both the Father and the Son.
1 John 2 says "Who is the liar but the one who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, the one who denies the Father and the Son. Everyone who denies the Son does not have the Father either. But whoever acknowledges the Son has the Father also."
There are those who acknowledge that Jesus came as the Christ among many denominations in the world, and some who acknowledge that Jesus came as the Christ are not part of any denomination. When Jesus comes, he will sort all those things out. 1 John 2 continues...
"As for you, what you have heard from the beginning must remain in you. If what you have heard from the beginning remains in you, you will also remain in union with the Son and in union with the Father."
What is it that we heard from the beginning? Love.
"I am giving you a new commandment, that you love one another; just as I have loved you, you also love one another. By this all will know that you are my disciples—if you have love among yourselves.”
Those who have love for the whole association of "brothers" ("brothers" meaning those who acknowledge that Christ came in the flesh), regardless of wherever those brothers may be found, are the ones who are truly witnesses of Jesus and of Jehovah.
"For God is my witness of how I am longing for all of you with such tender affection as Christ Jesus has. And this is what I continue praying, that your love may abound still more and more..."
-
72
Romans 9:5
by aqwsed12345 inna28: ὧν οἱ πατέρες καὶ ἐξ ὧν ὁ χριστὸς τὸ κατὰ σάρκα, ὁ ὢν ἐπὶ πάντων θεὸς εὐλογητὸς εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας, ἀμήν.. na28 transliterated: hō̃n hoi patéres kaì ex hō̃n ho khristòs tò katà sárka, ho ṑn epì pántōn theòs eulogētòs eis toùs aiō̃nas, amḗn.. kit: .
nwt: to them the forefathers belong, and from them the christ descended according to the flesh.
god, who is over all, be praised forever.
-
EasyPrompt
I am a witness of Jesus.
Jesus is also known as Yehoshua.
Yehoshua means "Yahweh is Salvation."
Jehovah is another name for Yahweh, Our Father.
Jesus said: "For the Father judges no one at all, but he has entrusted all the judging to the Son, so that all may honor the Son just as they honor the Father. Whoever does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent him."
Being a witness of Jesus and being a witness of Jehovah are not mutually exclusive. To the contrary, they are inextricably entwined.
"Do you not believe that I am in union with the Father and the Father is in union with me? The things I say to you I do not speak of my own originality, but the Father who remains in union with me is doing his works. Believe me that I am in union with the Father and the Father is in union with me; otherwise, believe because of the works themselves. Most truly I say to you, whoever exercises faith in me will also do the works that I do; and he will do works greater than these, because I am going my way to the Father. Also, whatever you ask in my name, I will do this, so that the Father may be glorified in connection with the Son."
But that the Father is greater than the Son, even Jesus bore witness when he said:
"The Father is greater than I am."
I believe him. "Jesus Christ, “the Faithful Witness...”
"Phil. 2: 9-10 "a name which is above every name: That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow""
It is because I bow to Jesus that I obey his command to glorify the Father in connection with the Son. I believe Jesus' witness, and I believe that everything Jesus said is true.
@SeaBreeze, now I am curious, do you not believe Jesus' words that the Father is greater than he is? I am sure you must believe.
-
72
Romans 9:5
by aqwsed12345 inna28: ὧν οἱ πατέρες καὶ ἐξ ὧν ὁ χριστὸς τὸ κατὰ σάρκα, ὁ ὢν ἐπὶ πάντων θεὸς εὐλογητὸς εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας, ἀμήν.. na28 transliterated: hō̃n hoi patéres kaì ex hō̃n ho khristòs tò katà sárka, ho ṑn epì pántōn theòs eulogētòs eis toùs aiō̃nas, amḗn.. kit: .
nwt: to them the forefathers belong, and from them the christ descended according to the flesh.
god, who is over all, be praised forever.
-
EasyPrompt
Hi aqwsed12345🙂
"I didn't see any specific arguments in your post"
Thank you for the compliment! I try not to come across as argumentative.😃
"the criticism of the church fathers that it doesn't coincide with your professed interpretation of the Bible, so therefore they must be wrong in every instance then too"
That's nice we agree on something! Yes, the so-called "church fathers" are wrong quite a bit. I wouldn't say in everything like you did, but they definitely cannot be relied upon as "beacons of light and truth" as regards shedding anything of value on the interpretation of the holy scriptures or even of a specific passage of scripture.
"So you are a non-JW JW?"
I don't believe in categorizing people according to manmade labels for the purpose of disregarding either their opinions on everything or their redeem-ability by means of the Christ. The Bible says...
"...there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, foreigner, Scythʹi·an, slave, or freeman; but Christ is all things and in all..."
...and also...
"...there is actually to us one God, the Father, from whom all things are and we for him; and there is one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things are and we through him. However, not all have this knowledge."
But for the sake of a baseline for conversation regarding your inquiry about my "history", I was an evolutionary atheist educated in anthropology and archaeology who became an omniest and then a Jehovah's Witness and I have been presently labelled by the Jehovah's Witness organization as a wicked disfellowshipped apostate deserving of death and mentally diseased, since I obey God as ruler rather than men (meaning I won't listen to the GB when they teach baloney and falsely claim their baloney is from the Bible or when they outright lie and I won't listen to the local elders when they require that I "bow" to them ahead of God).
But I identify as a Christian witness of Jehovah God. Thanks for asking.🙂
"Maybe the cat took them away?"
I've never heard that one before. Is that one of the apostolic fathers, too? Or is that Socrates or Plato or something? Oh! I know! The Cat..."It's a Wild World!" 😃 I love that song...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jta56wBl7SM
@awqsed12345, I notice you like to talk about Watchtower a lot but you're not quite accurate all the time about what they teach. The current teachings in the elder book and the "Organized to do Jehovah's Will" book read a lot like the Didache and epistles of the so-called "apostolic fathers". Reading the "apostolic fathers" makes me feel like I'm reading something cut-and-pasted from a WT article or another publication of the WTBT$. The more you quote the "apostolic fathers" the more it makes me think you might be what you are falsely accusing me of being - a sympathizer of Watchtower false doctrines at heart, at least in principle. The GB-Pharisee-types today seem to be cut of the same cloth as the "apostolic fathers", men who want to lord it over the flock and have the title and prominence of "fathers" instead of as true brothers in the congregations.
"But you, do not you be called Rabbi, for one is your Teacher, and all of you are brothers. Moreover, do not call anyone your father on earth, for one is your Father, the heavenly One. Neither be called leaders, for your Leader is one, the Christ."💖
-
72
Romans 9:5
by aqwsed12345 inna28: ὧν οἱ πατέρες καὶ ἐξ ὧν ὁ χριστὸς τὸ κατὰ σάρκα, ὁ ὢν ἐπὶ πάντων θεὸς εὐλογητὸς εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας, ἀμήν.. na28 transliterated: hō̃n hoi patéres kaì ex hō̃n ho khristòs tò katà sárka, ho ṑn epì pántōn theòs eulogētòs eis toùs aiō̃nas, amḗn.. kit: .
nwt: to them the forefathers belong, and from them the christ descended according to the flesh.
god, who is over all, be praised forever.
-
EasyPrompt
aqwsed12345 said:
"But some, placing the commas differently than they are commonly in the Greek text, say that a full stop must be put after 'flesh', and thus in the following words, there are the Jews' usual ancient Doxologies referring to God the Father, so this verse means..."
That reminds me of a song that was popular when I was in school....it sounded like: "comma, comma, comma, comma chameleon..." 🎶🦎😆
Sea Breeze said:
"Polycarp...says...Ignatius...says...Justin Martyr..."
So, chapter 9 of the Epistle of Polycarp to the Philippians is complete garbage. He says the resurrection already took place in his day, even though the Bible teaches that the resurrection of the anointed does not take place until after Christ takes the throne in heaven, which didn't happen in the day of Polycarp just like it didn't take place in 1914. (https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0136.htm)
From chapter 9: "I exhort you all, therefore, to yield obedience to the word of righteousness, and to exercise all patience, such as you have seen [set] before your eyes, not only in the case of the blessed Ignatius, and Zosimus, and Rufus, but also in others among yourselves, and in Paul himself, and the rest of the apostles. [This do] in the assurance that all these have not run Philippians 2:16; Galatians 2:2 in vain, but in faith and righteousness, and that they are [now] in their due place in the presence of the Lord, with whom also they suffered. For they loved not this present world, but Him who died for us, and for our sakes was raised again by God from the dead."
Chapter 10 of Polycarp to the Philippians is also ridiculous. He quotes Tobit, which is the type of fable story Paul warned Timothy against listening to...
"Stand fast, therefore, in these things, and follow the example of the Lord, being firm and unchangeable in the faith, loving the brotherhood, 1 Peter 2:17 and being attached to one another, joined together in the truth, exhibiting the meekness of the Lord in your intercourse with one another, and despising no one. When you can do good, defer it not, because “alms delivers from death.” Tobit 4:10, Tobit 12:9 Be all of you subject one to another 1 Peter 5:5 “having your conduct blameless among the Gentiles,”1 Peter 2:12 that you may both receive praise for your good works, and the Lord may not be blasphemed through you. But woe to him by whom the name of the Lord is blasphemed! Isaiah 52:5 Teach, therefore, sobriety to all, and manifest it also in your own conduct."
Polycarp quotes Ignatius numerous times in his "letter". Ignatius' Epistle to the Ephesians has the same kind of nonsense as what the JW Governing Body teaches about that false FDS doctrine...
Chapter 6 of the Epistle of Ignatius: "Now the more any one sees the bishop keeping silence, the more ought he to revere him. For we ought to receive every one whom the Master of the house sends to be over His household, Matthew 24:45 as we would do Him that sent him. It is manifest, therefore, that we should look upon the bishop even as we would upon the Lord Himself."
Epistle of Ignatius to the Trallians chapter 2 says: "For whenever you are subject to the bishop as unto Jesus Christ, you appear to me to be living not the ordinary life of men, but after the manner of the life of Jesus Christ,[1] Who died for our sakes, that believing in His death you might escape death. It is necessary therefore that you should act, as indeed you do, in nothing without the bishop." Or chapter 7 "That is, he who acts in anything apart from the bishop and the presbytery and the deacons is not pure in conscience."
Of chapter 7 of Ignatius to the Philadelphians: "For, when I was among you, I cried, I spoke with a loud voice: Give heed to the bishop, and to the presbytery and deacons. Now, some suspected me of having spoken thus, as knowing beforehand the division caused by some among you. But He is my witness, for whose sake I am in bonds, that I got no intelligence from any man. But the Spirit proclaimed these words: Do nothing without the bishop..."
I will spare you the rest of Ignatius' nonsense, but if you are in the mood for a read that reminds you of a Watchtower article about obeying the Governing Body you can read it here...(https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0104.htm http://earlychristianwritings.com/srawley/trallians.html or just google Ignatius and read his epistles.)
Don't even get me started on Justin Martyr. Seriously.
From Chapter 5 of the First Apology of Justin Martyr - "And when Socrates endeavoured, by true reason and examination, to bring these things to light, and deliver men from the demons, then the demons themselves, by means of men who rejoiced in iniquity, compassed his death, as an atheist and a profane person, on the charge that “he was introducing new divinities;” and in our case they display a similar activity. For not only among the Greeks did reason (Logos) prevail to condemn these things through Socrates, but also among the Barbarians were they condemned by Reason (or the Word, the Logos) Himself, who took shape, and became man, and was called Jesus Christ; and in obedience to Him, we not only deny that they who did such things as these are gods, but assert that they are wicked and impious demons, whose actions will not bear comparison with those even of men desirous of virtue."
From Chapter 8 of the First Apology of Justin Martyr - "And Plato, in like manner, used to say that Rhadamanthus and Minos would punish the wicked who came before them; and we say that the same thing will be done, but at the hand of Christ, and upon the wicked in the same bodies united again to their spirits which are now to undergo everlasting punishment; and not only, as Plato said, for a period of a thousand years."
The "Apostolic Fathers" might be better called the "Apostate Fathers". A lot of what they teach is similar to the false doctrines the GB teaches. The so-called "apostolic fathers" cannot be relied on for anything of substance as regards clarification of the truth.
Regardless of how you want to interpret Romans 9:5, the point of what Paul is saying can be found further down in the chapter...
"It is as he says also in Ho·seʹa: “Those not my people I will call ‘my people,’ and her who was not loved, ‘beloved’; and in the place where it was said to them, ‘You are not my people,’ there they will be called ‘sons of the living God.’” Moreover, Isaiah cries out concerning Israel: “Although the number of the sons of Israel may be as the sand of the sea, only the remnant will be saved. For Jehovah will make an accounting on the earth, concluding it and cutting it short.” Also, just as Isaiah foretold: “Unless Jehovah of armies had left an offspring to us, we should have become just like Sodʹom, and we should have resembled Go·morʹrah.” What are we to say, then? That people of the nations, although not pursuing righteousness, attained righteousness, the righteousness that results from faith; but Israel, although pursuing a law of righteousness, did not attain to that law. For what reason? Because they pursued it, not by faith, but as by works. They stumbled over the “stone of stumbling”; as it is written: “Look! I am laying in Zion a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense, but the one who rests his faith on it will not be disappointed.”
There are redeemable Christians to be found in all parts of the world. Having a label of "Christian" or "Jehovah's Witness" or "non-Jehovah's Witness" is not the important thing. There were faithful Christians in the first century who died before they knew that circumcision was not necessary for salvation. There are Christians today who don't know their right hand from their left.
"For you see his calling of you, brothers, that there are not many wise in a fleshly way, not many powerful, not many of noble birth, but God chose the foolish things of the world to put the wise men to shame; and God chose the weak things of the world to put the strong things to shame; and God chose the insignificant things of the world and the things looked down on, the things that are not, to bring to nothing the things that are, so that no one might boast in the sight of God. But it is due to him that you are in union with Christ Jesus, who has become to us wisdom from God, also righteousness and sanctification and release by ransom, so that it may be just as it is written: “The one who boasts, let him boast in Jehovah.”"
If someone doesn't have the exact correct idea about God, the ransom is still enough to purchase the life of that one. When Jesus comes, he will make all things clear. And it won't be whether or not we got every little prophecy right or every little grammatical interpretation right that matters. It will be our faith and our love.
"Love never fails."
Romans 9:14-18...
"What are we to say, then? Is there injustice with God? Certainly not! For he says to Moses: “I will show mercy to whomever I will show mercy, and I will show compassion to whomever I will show compassion.” So, then, it depends, not on a person’s desire or on his effort, but on God, who has mercy. For the scripture says to Pharʹaoh: “For this very reason I have let you remain: to show my power in connection with you and to have my name declared in all the earth.” So, then, he has mercy on whomever he wishes, but he lets whomever he wishes become obstinate."
Jehovah has assigned Jesus to be the judge. Thank God.
Romans 9:5 says: "God, who is over all, be praised forever. Amen."
-
16
Three Amish bishops who told woman to rescind protective order against husband, guilty of intimidation.
by was a new boy indoubtful a judicial committee would order a sister to rescind a protective order, but might tell her she wouldn't qualify for the privilege of being a auxiliary pioneer while she had it.. .
https://www.theindianalawyer.com/articles/amish-men-who-told-woman-to-vacate-protective-order-against-husband-lose-appeal-of-intimidation-convictions.
'riley rejected the defendant’s citation of cantwell v. connecticut, 310 u.s. 296, 60, s.ct.
-
EasyPrompt
@NotFormer...Thank you🙂🫶...Yes, I know these guys can be vindictive. The former COBE has been a wargamer for years, even though he grew up in the JWborg (he is second generation) he has for years been writing for tactics magazines, all the while giving talks at assemblies and conventions about peace. He has used similar underhanded tactics in the congregation...
http://www.ddg2014.altervista.org/report/Tunisia_Campaign_report.pdf
https://www.spigames.net/BickfordReplays/SiegeConstantinople.pdf
https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/18830840/the-rhineland-war-decision-games
http://www.decisiongames.com/AAR/AAR_MW3.pdf
https://www.spigames.net/BickfordReplays/Pattons_3rd_Army_Replay.pdf
https://grognard.com/indexes/st50.html
https://www.spigames.net/SPI_Replays.htm
https://rpggeek.com/wiki/page/FIRE_and_MOVEMENT
http://www.chinaww2.com/2013/10/16/gaming-the-sino-japanese-war-i/
https://www.meeplemountain.com/reviews/boardgame-redux-war-and-peace-comparative-review/
http://www.decisiongames.com/AAR/AAR_ST272.pdf
https://www.spigames.net/BickfordReplays/War_of_the_Ring.pdf
When I first started studying, he and another CO recommended that I get "adopted" so I could live with the COBE and his wife, even though I was 24 years old. Since I was new and foolish and I thought the CO and the COBE (it was called PO then) represented Jehovah's will, I obeyed. My biological mom was still alive but disfellowshipped - she had been a JW when I was a little kid. The COBE said "you need a dad". He and his wife paid $70 to get me legally adopted as an adult. Once I moved in with them, some more sketchy stuff happened that I won't mention right now. Years later when I got married, the COBE and his wife said I needed to get a Will & Testament made up so they could get custody of my kids if anything ever happened to me and my husband. Eventually when I told the other elders the sketchy stuff that happened, that's when my husband got mad and got arrested. When my husband was per government order out of the house, he went to the COBE and his wife and they called DHHS three times to try to get custody of my kids (even though legally my husband wasn't supposed to be near them). The DHHS people kept coming over our home and saying the children were fine, and they didn't understand why the COBE and his wife were calling. I told the elders what was happening, and they didn't care - they kept defending the COBE. I wrote to Bethel legal department and service department and the GB for help because they always said in the videos "We Love You Very Much", but later I found out that they were the ones giving the direction to the local brothers on how to handle things. (Incidentally, I got the "adoption" reversed by getting "readopted" by my biological mom and had the Will & Testament changed during that time, so the COBE and his wife stopped callling DHHS because now they know there is no way they will get custody.) But he keeps sending my children gifts even though I told him to stop. My husband is still "friends" with them.🤢🤮
@Vanderhoven...Thank you!💖 Praise Jehovah and Praise Jesus - all that time I was completely crushed and afraid but they made me strong. Your words also helped me have strength during that time.🙂As regards the kids, I will attach a photo of the letter we recently sent announcing our disassociation from the WTBT$. They were baptized as Jehovah's Witnesses at ages 9 and 11. (Even though I was already disfellowshipped last June, I also signed a copy of the recent disassociation letter.) The kids and I signed and dated it and sent copies to 37 different people in several circuits/congregations/departments at Bethel. The elders refused to announce the kids' disassociation at the local KH. (My husband and the former COBE both attend there.)
once upon a time these blokes had a reasonable expectation of being able to hide behind a cloak of secrecy, but now their actions and words are being shouted from the housetops!
🥰🫶💖
-
11530
It's been a long 9 years Lloyd Evans / John Cedars
by Newly Enlightened inoriginal reddit post (removed).
-
EasyPrompt
I understand what you're saying, @RaymondFrantz, it just makes me uncomfortable, and I don't really want to be a part of it. We've all been through so much hate already. Exposing something and hating badness is different than ridicule.
I really like you, but I think it's best if I leave the forum now. Thank you for talking with me when you did, I appreciate it.🙂
Love to you all - 💖 Audrey
-
11530
It's been a long 9 years Lloyd Evans / John Cedars
by Newly Enlightened inoriginal reddit post (removed).
-
EasyPrompt
I respect your decision to move on and wish you well 😊👍"
Thank you, Kim💖I wish you well, too.🙂
-
11530
It's been a long 9 years Lloyd Evans / John Cedars
by Newly Enlightened inoriginal reddit post (removed).
-
EasyPrompt
You don't have a clue. Please bring yourself up to speed on what's actually happened. Or just admit that you don't actually care and move on."
Your censure of me is neither accurate nor appropriate.
That I care should be obvious. When I spoke up it was also out of concern for your reputation, which is undermined every time you ridicule another person.
I know what it is like to be physically abused by members of the borg and then have the men at the top cover it up and misuse the legal system to harass the victim and protect the abuser. Don't tell me I don't know what it's like. Doxxing is bad, but it's not as bad as having an abuser try to come after your kids, him making fraudulent claims to DHHS in hopes of trying to get custody through another party and the congregation supporting him because he's HLC/COBE/high-rated speaker.
You're the one that doesn't have a clue.
I am sorry you are hurt, but your continuing the cycle of hate is unproductive and ends up hurting others.
I can see clearly that the "community" here that has a rule about "no intimidation, no abuse, no harassment" has a miles long thread that is designed to be intimidating, verbally abusive, and a form of harassment and yet nobody cares to intervene. If you'll allow abuse of one person, you'll allow abuse of another. How is it any different than the borg community?
I think I will take your advice and move on before you take aim at me next.
-
11530
It's been a long 9 years Lloyd Evans / John Cedars
by Newly Enlightened inoriginal reddit post (removed).
-
EasyPrompt
For people who don’t want to see this, then disengage from this thread and go elsewhere. That’s the best deal you are going to get and it won’t get any better. I’ll continue to shoot my mouth off.
Peace out...👋