piztjw

Joined

• started 44 topics
• posted 451 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by piztjw

• 
  34

  AGM 2014 Detailed Highlights - including talks summary.

  by Da.Furious in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  it is more likely to be one attack under different names.. gog of magog is not satan but a coalition of nations.

  1. what do talents represent?

  so who has the 5 talents?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  piztjw

  Revelation 20:7,8 “Now as soon as the 1,000 years have ended, Satan will be released from his prison, 8 and he will go out to mislead those nations in the four corners of the earth, Gog and Maʹgog, to gather them together for the war.

  It will be interesting to see how they spin this. Now the old truth that Gog was Satan is the new lie. Or is the old lie now the new truth? In any case how can Satan gather the nations, who now are considered Gog, AFTERhe is loosed at THE ENDof the thousand years? Aren't they supposedly destroyed at Armageddon? They have made a claim based on Ezekial, and as a result have made a lie of Revelation.
• 
  12

  TV.JW.ORG

  by piztjw in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i tried to, out of curiosity, watch tv.jw.org this morning.

  i barely could stand to make it seven minutes before i had to quit.. of course there were at least two, maybe three mentions in that short time of the expense incurred and the subtle begging for money to "support" the televangelism effort.

  a time lapse video showed the construction of the tv set.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  piztjw

  And your point is......
• 
  14

  Tv.jw.org - Here we go, "with your support" mentioned in the first 10 minutes of broadcast!

  by 4thgen in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  see minute 6:25 "with your support....".

  http://tv.jw.org/#video/vodmonthlyprogramming/pub-jwb_e_201410_1_video.

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  piztjw

  I noticed the term "trial basis" also. And as was mentioned in another thread, IF it has Gee-HOE-vah's blessing, then why would they only have it up on a trial basis. Second guessing God? IF it is only a trial basis, then it obvioulsy cannot have God's blessing.
• 
  26

  JW broadcasting now at tv.jw.org

  by Gorbatchov in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  the jw broadcasting is now at the subdomain tv.jw.org.

  goes live today.. g.. .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  piztjw

  Within the first minute Lett is asking for your $upport!

  I managed to make it seven minutes into the video before I had to shut it iff. I beleive I counted three appeals (although subtly worded) for $$$$$.
• 
  5

  My mind boggles with Jehovahs Witnesses and new light

  by smiddy in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  piztjw

  I get it too.

  New light = blank page.
• 
  32

  If JW's message is so urgent and Armageddon is imminent..

  by PopeOfEruke in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  then why do the walk so slow when out in field service?????????.

  honestly, i saw some dubs out witnessing yesterday and they have invented the "worlds most incredible slow walk".

  it makes a glacier look like a speeding avalanche.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  piztjw

  Armageddon is NOT imminent. Looney Lett unwittingly admits it in the first ever televangelism video on tv.jw.org.
• 
  12

  TV.JW.ORG

  by piztjw in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i tried to, out of curiosity, watch tv.jw.org this morning.

  i barely could stand to make it seven minutes before i had to quit.. of course there were at least two, maybe three mentions in that short time of the expense incurred and the subtle begging for money to "support" the televangelism effort.

  a time lapse video showed the construction of the tv set.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  piztjw

  I tried to, out of curiosity, watch tv.jw.org this morning. I barely could stand to make it seven minutes before I had to quit.

  Of course there were at least two, maybe three mentions in that short time of the expense incurred and the subtle begging for money to "support" the televangelism effort. A time lapse video showed the construction of the TV set. Office workers were booted out of their location to make room for the set. They bragged about them clearing out in a very short time. Of course they bragged about how Gee-HOE'-vaahhhh blessed the work, because, "an industry expert said, 'It would take over one year,' to build this set, and WE did it in only TWO MONTH'S." Followed by another veiled plea for money, and the explanation that the GB did this because everything would be moved to Warwick in two years, and everything used on the set would be used, "for YEARS to come."

  No Armageddon in the very near future I guess!

  If anyone else can stomache more than six or seven minutes I am sure that I and others would appreciate your thoughts.
• 
  207

  Is the AGM today?

  by hamsterbait in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  anybody going or who can give us the noolite hot from the gb a$$?.

  .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  piztjw

  Even if that is successful, it is self limiting. You can find maybe 4 or 5 interesting experiences. What are you going to do after that?

  Lie?
• 
  8

  Blondie's Comments You Will Not Hear at the 10-05-2014 WT Study (WOMEN)

  by blondie in

  1. jw
  2. friends
  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  piztjw

  that most times women are demeaned by brothers because other men in the congregation do no stand up for women. What about your congregation (s)?

  That is very true. Also another reason that "men" in the congregation do not stand up for women who are being treated in a demeaning fashion is because IMO they are not worthy of being called men! The are insecure, small "men". They are small intelligently. They are small emotionally. They are small in every way a male can be.

  That does not though say ALL women in the congregation are deserving of being stood up for. There are also a pretty fair number of JW women who are just as small and petty in their own ways as the "men".

  It's a product of the indoctrination of the JW's.
• 
  22

  I FIND THIS TROUBLING . . . DISTURBING . . . PUZZLING . . .

  by Terry in

  1. social
  2. current

  i stumbled on to this on youtube.. i began watching it.

  at first i thought it was funny.. then, something changed.

  i began to realize two things.. first of all, there are 2 sides to this, and both sides have a point.. if law enforcement does not have a legal right to stop and question you .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  piztjw

  By way of continued comment. The suggestions I mentioned work. I was stopped at a DUI checkpoint and when asked, "Have you had anything to drink?" I replied, "Yes. I had several glasses of water through the day. Two cans of Coke. I Gator-ade, and some milk with supper...." He interupted me and yelled, "That's NOT what I meant, and you know it! Have you had anything alcoholic to drink?" I replied, "Well I have been of legal age now for over forty years. And yes, in that time I have had alcoholic drinks on a number of occasions." He got really pissed and told me to pull over and take a breathalyzer. I refused to do so. After a twenty minute detainment going round and round about the legality of that test, or any other field sobriety tests, his supervisor came over and asked what the hold up was. When the young punk cop told him the supervisor asked me if I would take a breathalyzer. I politely, yet very firmly told him no. End result? I was sent on my way without showing ID or any further questioning, and didn't take any of their DUI tests either. Then again I NEVER drink alcohol and then drive so standing up for myself and the rights I have under the Constituion of The United States of America is a given.

  Same way a person should stand up for themselves when confronted by eldurrs.