And of course there was this "precious" nugget (turd)
"We don't focus on life's pleasures." I guess that explains why JW's are such a bunch of miserable people. Always focusing on life's miseries, and failures!
the subject of the study was jesus resurrection .
my post is not about the subject and whether or not that can be believed in.
millions of christians do and it is not my place to debunk religious faith.
And of course there was this "precious" nugget (turd)
"We don't focus on life's pleasures." I guess that explains why JW's are such a bunch of miserable people. Always focusing on life's miseries, and failures!
the new forum originally had a little country flag next to each post showing the country that the post was made from based on the geoip encoding (the country the ip address is from).
before i switched over to the new site someone made an issue about it violating their privacy and i didn't want to complicate and confuse the switchover with policy debate at the same time as technical issues so removed the flags even though i disagreed.. someone has already requested it as a feature and i think it should be added back so i thought it's now time to open the discussion and get everyone's opinions.
first, the reason i think it should be shown:.
If people have the choice then it negates some of the benefits:
"Dear possible spammer / scammer
Assuming that anyone who wants to have this small measure of anonymity by not displaying their country flag is a "spammer/scammer" is pretty paranoid, IMO!
the new forum originally had a little country flag next to each post showing the country that the post was made from based on the geoip encoding (the country the ip address is from).
before i switched over to the new site someone made an issue about it violating their privacy and i didn't want to complicate and confuse the switchover with policy debate at the same time as technical issues so removed the flags even though i disagreed.. someone has already requested it as a feature and i think it should be added back so i thought it's now time to open the discussion and get everyone's opinions.
first, the reason i think it should be shown:.
That's a little insulting.
Unlike say calling people who don't want their country of location shown by the flag PARANOID?
the new forum originally had a little country flag next to each post showing the country that the post was made from based on the geoip encoding (the country the ip address is from).
before i switched over to the new site someone made an issue about it violating their privacy and i didn't want to complicate and confuse the switchover with policy debate at the same time as technical issues so removed the flags even though i disagreed.. someone has already requested it as a feature and i think it should be added back so i thought it's now time to open the discussion and get everyone's opinions.
first, the reason i think it should be shown:.
why not raise the bar and make it more difficult for them
Certainly, let's all try to make things more difficult in any way we can. Already there are FIVE steps to even get logged on to this site. Perhaps along with adding information that makes it EASIER for some snoop to determine who may be here eight of ten more login steps could be added?
Sheesh, I thought I got off the JW style treadmill!
yes- everyone has faults and makes mistakes; an organization even more so.. yet, you ignore all the fingers pointing at you.. many here have no faith.
many here go to churches who lie about everything biblical; look at x-mas!.
but at least we know god and christ and try to live up to their name!.
Trying to prove ANYTHING to one who doesn't WANT to know is futile.
I wasn't going to post anything, but this statement was just to good to pass up! It would appear that some infantile Jdubber got a new tablet and cannot resist playing with it's new toy. Ignore the troll and it will go away and play with itself.
just a few instructions orders from mother about motels.. please use only hotels that appear on the recommended lodging list.
(one page, with only one motel locally).
one nights deposit (credit card, money order, etc.,) is required, and should be sent to the hotel within ten days of making your reservation.
Just a few instructions orders from mother about motels.
Please use only hotels that appear on the Recommended Lodging List. (One page, with only ONE motel locally)
One night’s deposit (credit card, money order, etc.,) is REQUIRED, and should be sent to the hotel within TEN DAYS of making your reservation. (Payment in advance for the ONE night that might be needed for the now only one day CA)
The circuit or the Society is not responsible for any problems, mistakes, or difficulties that may arise, inasmuch as your arrangements will be made directly with the hotel. (So you are told what motel you can use, but any problems are not in any way to be laid at the doorstep of the WT&T$)
Makes perfect sense to me. . .NOT!
a woman has been shot dead by a 2-year-old in a wal-mart store in idaho.. .
the 29-year-old was shopping with four children in the store in hayden, when the two-year-old reached into her handbag and fired the weapon, shooting her dead.. initial reports suggested the woman was the boy's mother, but the police have said that this is as yet unclear how they are related.. source; http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/toddler-accidentally-shoots-woman-in-idaho-walmart-9950847.html.
i've nothing to add to my past comments on americas psychotic relationship with guns.
How about the places in the US where there is strict gun-control
You mean like the schools, movie theatres, military bases? It's strange that those are the places most likely to be the location of INTENTIONAL criminal shootings.
a woman has been shot dead by a 2-year-old in a wal-mart store in idaho.. .
the 29-year-old was shopping with four children in the store in hayden, when the two-year-old reached into her handbag and fired the weapon, shooting her dead.. initial reports suggested the woman was the boy's mother, but the police have said that this is as yet unclear how they are related.. source; http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/toddler-accidentally-shoots-woman-in-idaho-walmart-9950847.html.
i've nothing to add to my past comments on americas psychotic relationship with guns.
@AndDon'tCallMeshirley
I believe you stated the facts most sensibly. As a patriotic, legal, American citizen who owns firearms, is a permitted CCW holder with a clean criminal background check, am not living in paranoid fear, hunts for my meat, I can also state that your are 100% correct in your above comment.
Well said!
a woman has been shot dead by a 2-year-old in a wal-mart store in idaho.. .
the 29-year-old was shopping with four children in the store in hayden, when the two-year-old reached into her handbag and fired the weapon, shooting her dead.. initial reports suggested the woman was the boy's mother, but the police have said that this is as yet unclear how they are related.. source; http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/toddler-accidentally-shoots-woman-in-idaho-walmart-9950847.html.
i've nothing to add to my past comments on americas psychotic relationship with guns.
In fact, how many gun shooting sprees are ever stopped by an armed bystander?
Here are about twenty to start with. I wouldn't expect most people to agree though, just as typical JW's will never agree to anything critical of their convictions, regardless of any facts presented.
http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2012/12/mass-killings-stopped-by-armed-citizens.html
a woman has been shot dead by a 2-year-old in a wal-mart store in idaho.. .
the 29-year-old was shopping with four children in the store in hayden, when the two-year-old reached into her handbag and fired the weapon, shooting her dead.. initial reports suggested the woman was the boy's mother, but the police have said that this is as yet unclear how they are related.. source; http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/toddler-accidentally-shoots-woman-in-idaho-walmart-9950847.html.
i've nothing to add to my past comments on americas psychotic relationship with guns.
Not sure what that has to do with gun rights. For every crazy idiotic moron with a gun there are 10 thousand responsible ones. But you don't hear about those.
That is the crux of the matter. IF the facts about all the safe, sane, responsible firearm owners were presented with the same level of persistence as the stories that portray firearms in a negative light there may be fewer frightened people. A firearm is nothing more than a tool. Like a chain saw it does nothing just sitting there. It is only when used that it has results, and improper use is dangerous, but used properly at the right time, and in the right manner any firearm is good. Of all the numerous firearms I own NOT ONE has ever hurt or killed a person. . .EVER!