"They believe and teach blood fractions is NOT BLOOD."
That is correct, blood fractions is not blood. Neither should plasma be as that is the stuff that blood rides on.
if i was an author of a book i think i would be over the moon if i was guaranteed a sale of around 5 million or more books for my work.. the jehovah`s witnesses have over 8 million members plus relatives that are fringe dwellers who come to the memorial once a year ,.
so what a gold mine they have been sitting on as a publishing house .. why didn`t they keep publishing books for the faithful ,they could have even upped the price , and the faithful would have paid especially in prosperous country`s in the west.. they could have milked this venture for years to come as the faithful would have bought anything they would have published .. and their prophets (profits) would have soared ,literally and figuratively for many more years to come ..
"They believe and teach blood fractions is NOT BLOOD."
That is correct, blood fractions is not blood. Neither should plasma be as that is the stuff that blood rides on.
very strange behavior by the attendants and elders after the duluth, ga, rc.
on the first link the attendants start to exit the arena, then line up and turn their backs on the street preachers.
(around the 6:00 mark).. elders and attendants after duluth rc.
They should have called the police and had him removed from the property.
i was approached by two jehovah’s witness elders who handed me a pamphlet advertising the jw .org website.
each man carried a bible and an apple ipad.
they told me that they enjoyed visiting with people about the bible, and asked if i was a bible reader.
That's not a doctrine that can be proven wrong.
Rev 19:1 says a great crowd in heaven but that is a description not an identifier of the specific group that John saw in Rev 7.
Having only 144,000 go to heaven to rule with Jesus makes perfect sense as what other reason would human be taken to heaven.
as jesus christ was preparing to go to his death, he encouraged his disciples with these words:.
"in my father's house are many mansions; if it were not so, i would have told you.
i go to prepare a place for you.
"In My Father's house are many mansions; if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you to Myself; that where I am, there you may be also." (John 14:2-3).
When Jesus said that he was talking to his apostles and disciples. He was stating that he will die and go to heaven as a spirit and then prepare a place for them there by casting Satan out of Heaven. But he was not referring to all believers. Just those ones with him.
have you ever wondered (when you were an active believer) what life would be like immediately after the big a?.
in my experience of the pre-big a spiritual paradise most witnesses were aware of the problem posed by the dead bodies of those slain by the bloody minded, would-be mass murderer jesus.
most liked to quote the author of the revelation, that carrion birds would eat the carcasses.
Perhaps they will just turn to dust like Thanos did.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2226652490738312&set=a.106546726082243&type=3&theater this was posted on fb by a witness who l am " friends " with .
she has since posted another jw propaganda piece .
these look like they are from the wt and are official evangelising tools .
"Funny that the book "Aid To Bible Understanding" printed by Jehovah`s Witnesses admitted that the name Jehovah was not the most accurate and that Yahweh was probably a more accurate rendering."
The name YHWH, Yahweh is Hebrew and was given to Hebrew speaking people. If God gave his name to English speaking people he would give it as Jehovah. The same way that Yeshua was Jesus' Hebrew name given to Mary, but in Engish was say Jesus.
i find people railing against the so called “two witness rule” puzzling.
i think its a complete and total non issue.
for those that protest, argue or advocate for change in that rule, why?
Phoebe said "Because it's devastating when an elder says to you 'it's your word against his, nothing we can do.'"
What do you expect them to do? Believe all women? The two witness rule presents some due process. With the Kavanagh hearings it was just his word vs her word. Do you ruin a man's, family's reputation with cooberating evidence?
https://www.ydr.com/story/news/2018/12/04/charges-dismissed-against-jehovahs-witness-accused-molesting-4-year-girl/2203041002/.
harges against a man accused of molesting his 4-year-old cousin in a york county jehovah’s witness kingdom hall in 2005 have been dismissed partly because the alleged offenses occurred when he was a juvenile.. john logan haugh, now 26, who now lives in delaware, was charged in may of this year with two counts of indecent assault of a person under the age of 13 in a case that shed light on the how the jehovah’s witnesses handle child sexual assault cases.
when john haugh appeared in court tuesday morning for a pre-trial conference, his attorney and the prosecutor had a discussion with judge maria musti cook out of earshot of the gallery in courtroom 7006. when court resumed, the prosecutor moved to dismiss the charges.
harges against a man accused of molesting his 4-year-old cousin in a York County Jehovah’s Witness Kingdom Hall in 2005 have been dismissed partly because the alleged offenses occurred when he was a juvenile.
John Logan Haugh, now 26, who now lives in Delaware, was charged in May of this year with two counts of indecent assault of a person under the age of 13 in a case that shed light on the how the Jehovah’s Witnesses handle child sexual assault cases.
When John Haugh appeared in court Tuesday morning for a pre-trial conference, his attorney and the prosecutor had a discussion with Judge Maria Musti Cook out of earshot of the gallery in courtroom 7006. When court resumed, the prosecutor moved to dismiss the charges. The reasons were not elaborated.
John Haugh’s lawyer, Jeffrey Marshall, said “a number of factors” played into the prosecution’s offer to dismiss the charges. He would not elaborate, saying that he didn’t want to jeopardize the agreement reached with the district attorney’s office.
The district attorney's office released a statement that said, "Due to the defendant's age at the time of the offense and compliance with the parameters of the agreement, both parties felt it was an appropriate resolution."
The girl’s father, Martin Haugh, a former elder in the Jehovah’s Witnesses who told police he had witnessed the abuse, said an assistant district attorney called his wife on Friday to inform her that the charges would be dismissed.
Martin Haugh said the assistant district attorney explained that since the alleged molestation occurred when John Haugh was a juvenile - about 13 or 14 at the time - the law in the case was different than if he had been an adult at the time. Because the younger Haugh had cooperated with authorities and had undergone evaluation and therapy, Martin Haugh said, he had been determined “not to be a threat to society.”
Martin Haugh said his family was “very disappointed” that the charges had been dismissed, but he understood why it happened. He didn’t fault the district attorney’s office, that they were simply following the law.
“They did more than the elders did,” he said. “At least, they attempted to do something.”
The alleged abuse occurred at the Kingdom Hall in Windsor Township. Haugh has reported that his wife had left him and his daughter to use the bathroom and during that time, John Haugh had lured the girl into “a secluded area where he assaulted her,” according to the criminal complaint filed in the case.
When Martin Haugh went to look for his daughter, he found her in a room sitting on John Haugh’s lap. He had his hand on her genital area under her clothing, according to the complaint.
Less than a week later, Martin Haugh said, it happened again.
In the criminal complaint, police said John Haugh "allegedly...molested other children."
Martin Haugh reported what happened to the church elders at the time, believing that they were mandated to report it to authorities under state law. The elders did not report it to police and John Haugh transferred to a different Kingdom Hall, Martin Haugh said.
Martin Haugh became disillusioned with the church and left it in 2016. He reported the abuse to police in 2017.
The dismissal of the charges does not affect Martin Haugh’s civil lawsuit filed against the church for not reporting the abuse to police, he said. That suit is pending.
The Jehovah’s Witnesses face, and have faced, other civil suits filed by survivors of abuse who allege that the church’s elders failed to report the crimes to authorities as mandated by law. The church often handles such cases internally, allowing its lay elders to decide punishment for offenders.
Critics say that the church’s insular nature and its rejection of secular authority creates an atmosphere that allows such crimes to go unreported.
The Jehovah’s Witnesses have responded to such suits by saying that it abhors child sexual abuse as a sin against Jehovah and that its policies are consistent with secular laws.
Why do they have a problem with good luck? Luck is just the probabilities of events happening. Good results is good luck and bad results is bad luck.
At assemblies they pray that people get home safely. That reduces the probabilities of crashes. Thus they pray for good events from the probabilities.
Thus the god of good luck is Jehovah.
Saying Good luck is a prayer to Jehovah for good events.
is there any word on what the results are for the 2018 service year report?.
I'm interested in the congregation totals. In the past congregations have always increased, but last years the congregations in the USA went down by 462. I know of at least 4 congregations my home state that were dissolved so that number would go down even more. That's encouraging because the more they dissolve them the harder it is on the publishers.