"new light!
(looking for opinions on this line of reasoning)
the basis for doing away with the 1914 doctrine may have been laid in this new book.
Alan F was correct in that the Proclaimers book acknowledges that Barbour is not the one that first came up with the time around 1914.
They would not change the start of the 2520 years to 587 because it did not start in 587. The start is not at the destruction of Jerusalem because the prophesy is not about Jerusalem.
acts 20:28 literally says: “his own blood”.
nwt interprets the verse: “the blood of his own son”.
nwt is an accurate interpretation because the verse is axiomatically referring to the blood of jesus and not the blood of god..
"which literally says : "the blood of his own", a subtle difference."
The blood of his own what?
This is why following the Bible does not give the clear answer, so we must use logic.
It can't be God's own blood Not his own blood but the blood of someone else.
And everywhere else in the Bible points to the blood of Jesus, his son.
Thus the NWT is accurate in its meaning.
admittedly it 90% crap over there but still they are up to 80k in subscribers.
over here it's the same half dozen or so that posts something, including myself.
why is that?.
Reddit is just a place where kids can vent about their parents when the fact is they need the direction of their parents or their parents need to be slapped.
Reddit is like twitter, in that it is just people jumping on the popularity bandwagon, i.e. Democrats, liberals just insulting because they can and it is encouraged.
here's my list of jw no-no's as i recall: .
1. no giving or accepting valentine candy for students.
2. no going to home coming football games.
I think all of you are nuts
"13. No dating Christians or anyone not a JW"
Of course JWs can date Christians. They are the ones in the congregation.
And they are allowed to date Non-JWs.
They can do many things on your lists.
They can be armed security guards. Just because in the past there was a superstition about it does not mean that thinking people hold to everyone's superstition. I would not be a security guard because it is a boring job. But if I were one, I would be like Macguyver and choose not to use guns, not because of a religion but because I feel that guns are for cowards.
here's my list of jw no-no's as i recall: .
1. no giving or accepting valentine candy for students.
2. no going to home coming football games.
About being a police officer. Why can't JWs carry guns? Nothing wrong with shooting bad people.
here's my list of jw no-no's as i recall: .
1. no giving or accepting valentine candy for students.
2. no going to home coming football games.
I could do #2, 3, 4,60 and many more.
thesis: when someone who is given a responsibility mistakes that responsibility for authority, bullying is very likely to occur.. jesus spoke an illustration recorded at matthew 24: 45-51 which well illustrates this thesis.. jesus asked, “who really is the faithful and discreet slave whom his master appointed over all his domestics, to give them their food at the proper time?
happy is that slave if his master on arriving finds him doing so.
truly i say to you, he will appoint him over all his belongings.
Why does it matter? Why does anyone ever care?
They like to focus on those words of Jesus but your caring about that gives them the power.
Just ignore that scripture and their power is gone.
jehovah’s witnesses and sexual abuse: 3. some common misunderstandings.
a chap called terrill hamons who l am taking to be a jw apologist on quora sent me this link along with many others .
the sites are all about how misunderstood and unfairly treated the wt is .
Question:
Why does the 9th commandment say "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour" (Exodus 20:16)
Why does The Hebrew Bible contain a number of prohibitions against false witness, lying, spreading false reports, etc Exodus 20:16, Deuteronomy 5:20, Exodus 23:1-2, Proverbs 19:5, Isaiah 29:20-22
Wouldn't it because Jehovah knew how people are? Untrustworthy liars
And he believes in Blackstone's ratio which is "It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer."
for what it is worth to those interested.
1914.. tel-aviv university.
"biblical military campaigns reconstructed using geomagnetic field data.
I keep asking this question when this topic comes up: Why does it matter when Jerusalem fell?
1914 is not based on the fall of Jerusalem. Just because Nelson Barbour thought it had to, does not mean that Jehovah God thought it did.
The problem is that people rely on books like 'the Gentile Times Reconsidered" and are just as lost Rutherford, Russell and Barbour. Carl Olof just wrote it to argue against the Watchtower Society because he is so arrogant. He didn't write it to find the fulfillment of Nathan's prophesy to David to find when Jesus would become king.
for what it is worth to those interested.
1914.. tel-aviv university.
"biblical military campaigns reconstructed using geomagnetic field data.
Why does it matter?
1914 is not based on the fall of Jerusalem.
Nelson Barbour thought it did and thus Charles Russell and his prodigy did.
But that does not make it so.
1914 is based on 2520 years after the kings in the line of David lost their sovereignty as sitting on Jehovah's throne in Jerusalem. That happened prior to the fall of Jerusalem.
