PA, I'm currently serving as an MS, but I doubt it will be for long ...
As for that drink, it would be my pleasure.
Eden
hello everyone.. just wanted to let you know that i've published a new article on the website of the christian fraternity of god's people, www.cfjp.weebly.com.
the article is called: "rejoice in the hope!
- the unifying hope for all christians".
PA, I'm currently serving as an MS, but I doubt it will be for long ...
As for that drink, it would be my pleasure.
Eden
hello everyone.. just wanted to let you know that i've published a new article on the website of the christian fraternity of god's people, www.cfjp.weebly.com.
the article is called: "rejoice in the hope!
- the unifying hope for all christians".
I don't share that view, Blondie. In another article on my website, I observe that the baptism vows as currently practiced among Jehovah's Witnesses don't even truly qualify as a baptism "in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit". We're Christians, but.... so are the others.
Eden
i made this chart three years ago, and in light of the 2014 watchtower study i decided it was time for further refinement.. this chart probably won't fit on a regular page.. .
feel free to distribute.. .
.
marked
hello everyone.. just wanted to let you know that i've published a new article on the website of the christian fraternity of god's people, www.cfjp.weebly.com.
the article is called: "rejoice in the hope!
- the unifying hope for all christians".
Because "Yahweh" is still the Father's name, after all. [or Jehovah, or Ieova, or Jeová, according to what language ....]
hello everyone.. just wanted to let you know that i've published a new article on the website of the christian fraternity of god's people, www.cfjp.weebly.com.
the article is called: "rejoice in the hope!
- the unifying hope for all christians".
Heads up, I've added information to Part 13 of this article.
Eden
i would like to locate some information within the publications with comments from the wts that could help me build a case.. case in point is: can an individual jw hold different views on doctrine from those held by the "organization" and still continue to be a jw if he chooses to, and if he keeps his opinions only to himself?.
i remember a recent magazine making comments regarding the intolerance of other religions who limit the freedom of their members to study the bible....or another one (publishers book?
) about those who harbored doubts about the course of events within the organization but remained inside.. i got an excellent quote from rutherford in the booklet "intolerance" but that was from 1936 already.
Adam, I think that's exactly the one I had in mind.
I may be facing ...hmmm....an ordeal soon, and some quotes to that effect may come handy.
Thanks.
Eden
i would like to locate some information within the publications with comments from the wts that could help me build a case.. case in point is: can an individual jw hold different views on doctrine from those held by the "organization" and still continue to be a jw if he chooses to, and if he keeps his opinions only to himself?.
i remember a recent magazine making comments regarding the intolerance of other religions who limit the freedom of their members to study the bible....or another one (publishers book?
) about those who harbored doubts about the course of events within the organization but remained inside.. i got an excellent quote from rutherford in the booklet "intolerance" but that was from 1936 already.
Thank you guys for the quotes....but still haven't found the ones I was looking for.
Eden
i would like to locate some information within the publications with comments from the wts that could help me build a case.. case in point is: can an individual jw hold different views on doctrine from those held by the "organization" and still continue to be a jw if he chooses to, and if he keeps his opinions only to himself?.
i remember a recent magazine making comments regarding the intolerance of other religions who limit the freedom of their members to study the bible....or another one (publishers book?
) about those who harbored doubts about the course of events within the organization but remained inside.. i got an excellent quote from rutherford in the booklet "intolerance" but that was from 1936 already.
Yeah, the "Walsh Case", S&R. I got the full transcription in pdf. somewhere in my hard drive. Hard to read through and through to find the relevant bits.
Eden
love this young fellows discourse on the watchtowers completely messed up and twisted view of the 'faithful and discreet slave'.. he shreds their entire false teaching and doctrine in a few minutes.... .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_9ukq86dee&list=pl0d60f08a64dea48e.
marked
i would like to locate some information within the publications with comments from the wts that could help me build a case.. case in point is: can an individual jw hold different views on doctrine from those held by the "organization" and still continue to be a jw if he chooses to, and if he keeps his opinions only to himself?.
i remember a recent magazine making comments regarding the intolerance of other religions who limit the freedom of their members to study the bible....or another one (publishers book?
) about those who harbored doubts about the course of events within the organization but remained inside.. i got an excellent quote from rutherford in the booklet "intolerance" but that was from 1936 already.
Hey.
I need your help if possible. I would like to locate some information within the publications with comments from the WTS that could help me build a case.
Case in point is: Can an individual JW hold different views on doctrine from those held by the "Organization" and still continue to be a JW if he chooses to, and if he keeps his opinions only to himself?
I remember a recent magazine making comments regarding the intolerance of other religions who limit the freedom of their members to study the Bible....or another one (Publishers book?) about those who harbored doubts about the course of events within the organization but remained inside.
I got an excellent quote from Rutherford in the booklet "Intolerance" but that was from 1936 already. Is there anything I could use that's more recent?
Thank you in advance for any help.
Eden