Millions Now Outed Will Never Die!
soontobe
JoinedPosts by soontobe
-
447
Problems with the "Bogus AWAA Fan Page"..
by OUTLAW ingood afternoon jwn... .
i`ve spent the morning and part of my afternoon... getting to the bottom of... why names were added to the awaa fan page... it`s a dangerous thing to happen in our world... faders can be outed,we can lose,family,friends... the results can be an absolute disaster... .
aawa "did not" create the facebook awaa fan page.
-
447
Problems with the "Bogus AWAA Fan Page"..
by OUTLAW ingood afternoon jwn... .
i`ve spent the morning and part of my afternoon... getting to the bottom of... why names were added to the awaa fan page... it`s a dangerous thing to happen in our world... faders can be outed,we can lose,family,friends... the results can be an absolute disaster... .
aawa "did not" create the facebook awaa fan page.
-
soontobe
So my SO is in a predicament? How incredibly flippant.
-
447
Problems with the "Bogus AWAA Fan Page"..
by OUTLAW ingood afternoon jwn... .
i`ve spent the morning and part of my afternoon... getting to the bottom of... why names were added to the awaa fan page... it`s a dangerous thing to happen in our world... faders can be outed,we can lose,family,friends... the results can be an absolute disaster... .
aawa "did not" create the facebook awaa fan page.
-
soontobe
But none of the ones doing the adding were faders, so that point is irrelevant.
But what of the added ones?
-
447
Problems with the "Bogus AWAA Fan Page"..
by OUTLAW ingood afternoon jwn... .
i`ve spent the morning and part of my afternoon... getting to the bottom of... why names were added to the awaa fan page... it`s a dangerous thing to happen in our world... faders can be outed,we can lose,family,friends... the results can be an absolute disaster... .
aawa "did not" create the facebook awaa fan page.
-
soontobe
But as I said, and as cantleave just reiterated, it's a secret group.
WHO CARES.
Force-adding hundreds of people is just a hare brained thing to do. Talk about poor judgement.
That's basically like spamming someone, FB style.
And then the lies. That's even worse.
By the way, my understanding is that people who have been added know who added them. FB gives them the name.
-
447
Problems with the "Bogus AWAA Fan Page"..
by OUTLAW ingood afternoon jwn... .
i`ve spent the morning and part of my afternoon... getting to the bottom of... why names were added to the awaa fan page... it`s a dangerous thing to happen in our world... faders can be outed,we can lose,family,friends... the results can be an absolute disaster... .
aawa "did not" create the facebook awaa fan page.
-
soontobe
So was this done by a member of AAWA or not?
-
165
'1600 years of Ice melting in 25 years is a bad omen'
by designs inglaciologists from ohio state university have been studying the ice fields in peru.
tropical peru is home to ice formations 18,000 feet up in the quelccaya region, the largest of these tropical region ice sheets.. the glacier is melting so quickly that plant samples are having to be frozen artifically so that scientists 30 years from now can have something to study, lonnie thompson from the university said in the interview.
the ice field is the smallest it has been since the last ice age.. peruvians rely on the water from the glaciers, which will be reduced by 50% in their lifetime.
-
soontobe
Svensmark's 1998 work suggesting the suns increased magnetic strength decreases the amount of galactic cosmic rays reaching the atmosphere which means less clouds (that GCR's seed clouds is a key part of the hypotheses) and therefore a warmer planet. It is a tiny minority view from a well qualified climate scientist, and therefore commonly quoted at length by deniers.
Svensmark's papers are cited 100s of times. The GCR/climate hypothesis predates Svensmark, going back to Edward P. Ney in 1959.
Solar magnetic properties haven't changed over the last 3 decades and therefore can't explain climate change over that period
You need to go back and see my previous post with a link to a paper covering the last 3 decades and the AMO.
Galactic cosmic rays have shown no trend in the last 50 years, in fact they have increased since 1990 and if Svensmark is correct that should mean global cooling.
Over such a short period, there may be less correlation because there are other stronger drivers that can swamp the signal. I just mentioned the AMO. Over longer periods, there are greater correlations.
However, GCRs declined during the first half of the 20th century, and essentially remainedat the depressed level during the second half.
Now why has there been no warming trend since about 2000?
Cosmic rays aren't very good at seeding clouds - this is a 3 step process and whilst step 1 isn't controversial, step 2 has been shown improbable by at least 1 study is and step 3 not likely by numerous studies
Svensmark's hypothesis linking GCRs to cloud formation has been supported both observationally, and experimentally, and that the aerosol particles produced grow large enough to form condensation nuclei.
Svensmark is proof that the scientific method including peer review is alive and well in climate science. Minority views are accorded respect and are subject to disproval - in thsi case categoric rebuttal.
Do you mean to say you've rebutted that cosmic rays do not affect climate?
I do not doubt that the atmosphere, which includes its carbon dioxide fraction, helps to keep the planet warm. What I am not convinced of is that the atmospheric levels, which have been rising for many many years, have been the predominant driver of the late 20th century warming.
What I believe is FALSE is the AGW camp assertion that the increased CO2 levels will push us past a point of no return where a runaway positive feedback loop ruins planetary habatibility. It is a complex, adaptive system that is poorly understood. The planet has billions of years of history, including far warmer climates where tropical plants grew in arctic areas and the planet supported a larger biomass than today. As for the "98%" figure you keep repeating, it's a credentialist argumentum ad populum. Dismissed.
-
99
Margaret Thatcher has Died
by cantleave inwhether loved or hated her, you couldn't ignore her.. http://news.sky.com/story/1075292/margaret-thatcher-dies-after-stroke.
-
soontobe
Glander, don't do it.
-
99
Margaret Thatcher has Died
by cantleave inwhether loved or hated her, you couldn't ignore her.. http://news.sky.com/story/1075292/margaret-thatcher-dies-after-stroke.
-
35
A.D. -The Most Important Book Today?
by metatron ini just started reading "a.d. - after disclosure" by richard dolan.
it is an attempt to rationally predict what will ( or would, depending on your viewpoint) happen when authorities around the world admit that extraterrestrials exist and first contact happens.. will markets crash?
will religions collapse?
-
soontobe
Satanus: Then where did the alien life come from, and how did it originate from non-life? It just kicks the can back.
'
-
99
Margaret Thatcher has Died
by cantleave inwhether loved or hated her, you couldn't ignore her.. http://news.sky.com/story/1075292/margaret-thatcher-dies-after-stroke.